Molecular Modeling Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 143-172

  Torda, Andrew E ^a   van Gunsteren, Wilfred F ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dihedral angle restraints; Discrete conformations; Force field; Molecular modeling; Nuclear magnetic resonance data

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050563277     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470125809.ch3     Document Type: Chapter

References (122)

1. G. M. Clore and A. M. Gronenborn, CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., 24, 479 (1989). Determina-tion of the Three Dimensional Structures of Proteins and Nucleic Acids in Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
2. J. H. Noggle and R. E. Schirmer, The Nuclear Overhauser Effect, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
3. J. Jenner, in Proceedings of the Ampere International Summer School, Bask Polje, Yugoslavia, 1971.
4. R. R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen, and A. Wokaun, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986.
5. A. Kumar, R. R. Ernst, and K. Wuthrich, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 95, 1 (1980). A Two-Dimensional Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (2D NOE) Experiment for the Elucidation of Complete Proton-Proton Cross-Relaxation Networks in Biological Macromolecules.
6. S. Macura and R. R. Ernst, Mol. Phys., 41, 95 (1980). Elucidation of Cross-Relaxation in Liquids by Two-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy.
7. G. M. Crippen, in Chemometrics Research Studies Series, Vol. 1, D. Bawden, Ed., Research Studies Press (Wiley), New York, 1981. Distance Geometry and Conformational Calculations.
8. W. Braun and N. Go, Mol. Biol., 186, 611 (1983). Calculation of Protein Conformations by Proton-Proton Distance Constraints. A New Efficient Algorithm.
9. W. F. van Gunsteren, R. Kaptein, and E. R. P. Zuiderweg, in Proceedings of the NATOJ CECAM Workshop on Nucleic Acid Conformation and Dynamics, W. K. Olsen, Ed., Centre de Calcul Atomique et Moleculaire, Orsay, 1984, pp. 79-82. Use of Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulations When Determining Protein Structure by 2D-NMR.
10. T. F. Havel, G. M. Crippen, and I. D. Kuntz, Biopolymers, 18, 73 (1979). Effects of Distance Constraints on Macromolecular Conformation. II. Simulation of Experimental Results and Theoretical Predictions.
11. K. Wuthrich, M. Billeter, and W. Braun, J. Mol. Biol., 169,949 (1983). Pseudo-Structures for the 20 Common Amino Acids for Use in Studies of Protein Conformations by Measurements of Intramolecular Proton-Proton Distance Constraints with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
12. L. G. Dunfield, A. W. Burgess, and H. A. Scheraga, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 82, 2609 (1978). Energy Parameters in Polypeptides. 8. Empirical Potential Energy Algorithm for the Conformation Analysis of Large Molecules.
13. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 187 (1983). CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization and Dynamics Calculations.
14. W. F. van Gunsteren and H. J. C. Berendsen, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 10, 301 (1982). Molecu-lar Dynamics: Perspectives for Complex Systems.
15. W. F. van Gunsteren, R. Boelens, R. Kaptein, R. M. Scheek, and E. R. P. Zuiderweg, in Molecular Dynamics and Protein Structure, J. Hermans, Ed., Polycrystal Book Service, Western Springs, Illinois, 1985, pp. 92-99. An Improved Restrained Molecular Dynamics Technique to Obtain Protein Tertiary Structure from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data.
16. W. Braun, Q. Rev. Biophys., 19, 115 (1987). Distance Geometry and Related Methods for Protein Structure Determination from NMR Data.
17. G. M. Clore and A. M. Gronenborn, Protein Engin., 1, 275 (1987). Determination of Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins in Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
18. T. F. Havel, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 56, 43 (1991). An Evaluation of Computational Strategies for Use in the Computational Determination of Protein Structure from Distance Constraints Obtained by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
19. L. M. Blumenthal, Theory and Applications of Distance Geometry, Chelsea, New York, 1970.
20. G. M. Crippen, J. Comput. Phys., 26, 449 (1977). A Novel Approach to the Calculation of Conformation: Distance Geometry.
21. G. M. Crippen and T. F. Havel, Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation, Chemo-metrics Research Studies Series, D. Bawden, Ed., Wiley, New York, 1981.
22. T. F. Havel, I. D. Kuntz, and G. M. Crippen, Bull. Math. Biol. 45, 665 (1983). The Theory and Practice of Distance Geometry.
23. A. R. Leach, Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 2, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, pp. 1-55. A Survey of Methods for Searching the Conformational Space of Small and Medium-Sized Molecules.
24. W. Braun, C. Bosch. L. R. Brown, N. Go, and K. Wuthrich, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 667, 377 (1981). Combined Use of Proton-Proton Overhauser Enhancements and a Distance Geometry Algorithm for Determination of Polypeptide Conformations. Application to Micelle-Bound Glucagon.
25. W. Braun, G. Wider, H. K. Lee, and K. Wuthrich, J. Mol. Biol., 169, 921 (1983). Conforma-tion of Glucagon in a Lipid-Water Interphase 'H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
26. A. D. Arseniev, V. I. Kondakov, V. N. Maiorov, and V. F. Bystrov, FEBS Lett., 165,57 (1984). NMR Solution Spatial Structure of Short Scorpion Insectotoxin 15A.
27. M. P. Williamson, T. F. Havel, and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol. Biol., 182, 295 (1985). Solution Conformation of Proteinase Inhibitor 11A from Bull Seminal Plasma by *H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry.
28. T. F. Havel and K. Wiithrich, Bull. Math. Biol., 182, 673 (1985). A Distance Geometry Program for Determining the Structures of Small Proteins and Other Macromolecules from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Measurements of Intramolecular aH-'H Proximities in Solution.
29. R. Morrison and D. Hare, J. Mol. Biol., 204, 483 (1988). Determining Stereospecific 'H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Assignments from Distance Geometry Calculations.
30. G. M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem., 10, 896 (1989). Linearized Embedding: A New Metric Matrix Algorithm for Calculating Molecular Conformations Subject to Geometric Constraints.
31. A. D. Kline, W. Braun, and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol. Biol., 204, 675 (1988). Determination of the Complete Three-Dimensional Structure of the α-Amylase Inhibitor Tendamistat in Aqueous Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry.
32. P. Guntert and K. Wiithrich, J. Biomol. NMR, 1,447 (1991). Improved Efficiency of Protein Structure Calculations from NMR Data Using the Program DIANA with Redundant Dihedral Angle Constraints.
33. W Braun, G. Wagner, E. Worgotter, M. Vasak, J. H. R. Kagi, and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol. Biol. 187, 125 (1986). Polypeptide Fold in the Two Metal Clusters of Metallothionein-2 by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry.
34. A. D. Kline, W. Braun, and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol. Biol., 189, 377 (1986). Studies by 'H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry of the Solution Conformation of Tendamistat, and α-Amylase Inhibitor.
35. G. Wagner, W. Braun, T. F. Havel, T. Schaumann, N. Go, and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol. Biol., 196, 611 (1987). Protein Structures in Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry: The Polypeptide Fold of the Basic Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor Determined Using Two Different Algorithms. DISGEO and DISMAN.
36. D. Kohda, N. Go, K. Hayashi, and F. Inagaki, J. Biochem., 103, 741 (1988). Tertiary Structure of Mouse Epidermal Growth Factor Determined by Two-Dimensional 'H NMR.
37. P. Guntert, Y. Q. Qian, G. Otting, M. Miiller, W. Gehring, and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol. Biol., 217, 531 (1991). Structure Determination of the Antp (C39 → S) Homeodomain from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data in Solution Using a Novel Strategy for the Structure Calculation with the Programs DIANA, CALIBA, HABAS, and GLOMSA.
38. P. J. Kraulis and T. A. Jones, Proteins, 2, 188 (1987). Determination of Three-Dimensional Protein Structures from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data Using Fragments of Known Structures.
39. R. B. Altman and O. Jardetzky, in Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 177, N. J. Oppenheimer and T. L. James, Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1989, pp. 218-246. Heuristic Refinement Method for Determination of Solution Structure of Proteins from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data.
40. R. Pachter, R. B. Altman, and O. Jardetzky, J. Magn. Reson., 89, 578 (1990). The Depen-dence of a Protein Solution Structure on the Quality of the Input NMR Data. Application of the Double-Iterated Kalman Filter Technique to Oxytocin.
41. R. Pachter, R. B. Altman, J. Czaplicki, and O. Jardetzky, J. Magn. Reson., 92, 468 (1991). Comparison of the NMR Solution Structures of Cyclosporin A Determined by Different Techniques.
42. A. Kalk and H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Magn. Reson., 24, 343 (1976). Proton Magnetic Relaxa-tion and Spin Diffusion in Proteins.
43. J. de Vlieg, R. Boelens, R. M. Scheek, R. Kaptein, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Isr. J. Chem., 27, 181 (1986). Restrained Molecular Dynamics Procedure for Protein Tertiary Structure Determination from NMR Data: A lac Repressor Headpiece Structure Based on Information on J-Coupling and from Presence and Absence of NOEs.
44. D. C. Fry, V. S. Madison, D. R. Bolin, D. N. Greeley, V. Toome, and B. B. Wegrzynski, Biochemistry, 28, 2399 (1989). Solution Structure of an Analogue of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide as Determined by Two-Dimensional NMR and Circular Dichroism Spectroscopies and Constrained Molecular Dynamics.
45. H. Widmer, M. Billeter, and K. Wiithrich, Proteins, 6, 357 (1989). Three-Dimensional Structure of the Neurotoxin ATX la from Anemonia sulcata in Aqueous Solution Determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
46. M. Billeter, Th. Schaumann, W. Braun, and K. Wiithrich, Biopolymers, 29, 695 (1989). Restrained Energy Refinement with Two Different Algorithms and Force Fields of the Structure of the α-Amylase Inhibitor Tendamistat Determined by NMR in Solution.
47. T. A. Holak, J. H. Prestegard, and J. D. Forman, Biochemistry, 26, 4652 (1987). NMR-Pseudoenergy Approach to the Solution Structure of Acyl Carrier Protein.
48. J. N. Scarsdale, P. Ram, J. H. Prestegard, and R. K. Yu, J. Comput. Chem., 9, 133 (1988). A Molecular Mechanics-NMR Pseudoenergy Approach to the Solution Conformation of Glycolipids.
49. S. A. Woodson and D. M. Crothers, Biopolymers, 28, 1149 (1989). Conformation of a Bulge-Containing Oligomer from a Hot-Spot Sequence by NMR and Energy Minimization.
50. O. Jardetzky, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 621,227 (1980). On the Nature of Molecular Confor-mations Inferred from High-Resolution NMR.
51. H. Pepermans, D. Tourwe, G. van Binst, R. Boelens, R. M. Scheek, W. F. van Gunsteren, and R. Kaptein, Biopolymers, 27,323 (1988). The Combined Use of NMR, Distance Geometry and Restrained Molecular Dynamics for the Conformational Study of a Cyclic Somatostatin Analogue.
52. H. Kessler, C. Griesinger, J. Lautz, A. Miiller, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 110, 3393 (1988). Conformational Dynamics Detected by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance NOE Values and J Coupling Constants.
53. Y. Kim and J. H. Prestegard, Biochemistry, 28, 8792 (1989). A Dynamic Model for the Structure of Acyl Carrier Protein in Solution.
54. A. E. Torda, R. M. Scheek, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Chem. Phys. Lett., 157, 289 (1989). Time-Dependent Distance Restraints in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
55. A. E. Torda, R. M. Scheek, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Mol. Biol., 214, 223, (1990). Time-Averaged NOE Distance Restraints Applied to Tendamistat.
56. J. Tropp, J. Chem. Phys., 72, 6035 (1980). Dipolar Relaxation and Nuclear Overhauser Effects in Nonrigid Molecules: The Effect of Fluctuating lnternuclear Distances.
57. D. A. Pearlman and P. A. Kollman, J. Mol. Biol., 220, 457 (1991). Are Time-Averaged Restraints Necessary for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Refinement?.
58. B. D. Sykes, W. E. Hull, and G.H. Snyder, Biophys. J., 21, 137 (1978). Experimental Evidence for the Role of Cross-relaxation in Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin Lattice Relaxation Time Measurements in Proteins.
59. M. Madrid, J. E. Mace, and O. Jardetzky, J. Magn. Reson., 83, 267 (1989). Consequences of Magnetization Transfer on the Determination of Solution Structures of Proteins.
60. R. Boelens, T. M. G. Koning, and R. Kaptein, J. Mol. Struct., 173, 299 (1988). Determina-tion of Biomolecular Structures from Proton-Proton NOE's Using a Relaxation Matrix Approach.
61. R. Boelens, T. M. G. Koning, G. A. van der Marel, J. H. van Boom, and R. Kaptein, J. Magn. Reson., 82, 290 (1989). Iterative Procedure for Structure Determination from Proton-Proton NOE's Using a Full Relaxation Matrix Approach. Applications to a DNA Octamer.
62. j. W. Keepers and T. L. James, J. Magn. Reson., 57, 404 (1984). A Theoretical Study of Distance Determinations from NMR. Two-Dimensional Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectra.
63. B. A. Borgias and T. L. James, J. Magn. Reson., 87, 475 (1990). MARDIGRAS-A Proce-dure for Matrix Analysis of Relaxation for Discerning Geometry of an Aqueous Structure.
64. E. T. Olejniczak, R. T. Gampe, Jr., and S. W. Fesik, J. Magn. Reson., 67, 28 (1986). Account-ing for Spin Diffusion in the Analysis of 2D NOE Data.
65. K. M. Banks, D. R. Hare, and B. R. Reid, Biochemistry, 28, 6996 (1989). Three-Dimensional Solution Structure of a DNA Duplex Containing the Bell Restriction Sequence: Two-Dimensional NMR Studies, Distance Geometry Calculations, and Refinement by Back-Calculation of the NOESY Spectrum.
66. P. Yip and D. A. Case, J. Magn. Reson., 83, 643 (1989). A New Method for Refinement of Macromolecular Structures Based on Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectra.
67. J. D. Baleja, J. Moult, and B. D. Sykes, J. Magn. Reson., 87, 375 (1990). Distance Measure-ment and Structure Refinement with NMR Data.
68. M. Nilges, J. Habazettl, A. T. Brunger, and T. A. Holak, J. Mol. Biol., 219, 499 (1991). Relaxation Matrix Refinement of the Solution Structure of Squash Trypsin Inhibitor.
69. A. M. J. J. Bonvin, R. Boelens, and R. Kaptein, J. Biomol. NMR, in press. Direct NOE Refinement of Biomolecular Structures Using 2D NMR Data.
70. A. M. J. J. Bonvin, R. Boelens, and R. Kaptein, J. Magn. Reson., in press. Direct Structure Refinement using 3D NOE-NOE Spectra of Biomolecules.
71. J. E. Mertz, P. Guntert, K. Wuthrich, and W. Braun, J. Biomol. NMR, 1, 257 (1991). Complete Relaxation Matrix Refinement of NMR Structures of Proteins Using Analytically Calculated Dihedral Angle Derivatives of NOE Intensities.
72. M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys., 30, 11 (1959). Contact Electron-Spin Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments.
73. M. Karplus, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 85, 2870 (1963). Vicinal Proton Coupling in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
74. A. Pardi, M. Billeter, and K. Wuthrich, J. Mol. Biol., 180, 741 (1984). Calibration of the Angular Dependence of the Amide Proton-Ca Proton Coupling Constants, !JHNo, in a Globular Protein.
75. S. Ludvigsen, K. V. Andersen, and F. M. Poulsen, J. Mol. Biol., 217, 731 (1991). Accurate Measurements of Coupling Constants from Two-Dimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra of Proteins and Determination of Angles.
76. G. M. Clore, M. Nilges, D. K. Sukumaran, A. T. Brunger, M. Karplus, and A. M. Gronen-born, EMBO J., 5, 2729 (1986). The Three-Dimensional Structure of α-Purothionin in Solution: Combined Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Distance Geometry, and Restrained Molecular Dynamics.
77. G. M. Clore, D. K. Sukumaran, M. Nilges, and A. M. Gronenborn, Biochemistry, 26,1732 (1987). Three-Dimensional Structure of Phoratoxin in Solution: Combined Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Distance Geometry, and Restrained Molecular Dynamics.
78. Y. Kim and J. H. Prestegard, Proteins, 8, 377 (1990). Refinement of the NMR Structures for Acyl Carrier Protein with Scalar Coupling Data.
79. J. A. McCammon and S. C. Harvey, Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
80. C. L. Brooks III, M. Karplus, and B. M. Pettitt, Proteins: A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure and Thermodynamics, Advances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 71, Wiley, New York, 1988.
81. W. F. van Gunsteren and H. J. C. Berendsen, Angew. Chem., 29, 992 (1990). Computer Simulation of Molecular Dynamics: Methodology, Applications, and Perspectives in Chemistry.
82. A. T. Brunger and M. Karplus, Ace. Chem. Res., 24, 54 (1991). Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Experimental Restraints.
83. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 3684 (1984). Molecular Dynamics with Coupling to a Heat Bath.
84. R. Kaptein, E. R. P. Zuiderweg, R. M. Scheek, R. Boelens, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Mol. Biol., 182, 179 (1985). A Protein Structure from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data: lac Repressor Headpiece.
85. G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, A. T. Briinger, and M. Karplus, J. Mol. Biol., 186, 435 (1985). Solution Conformation of a Heptadecapeptide Comprising the DNA Binding Helix F of the Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein of Escherichia coli. Combined Use of 'H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Restrained Molecular Dynamics.
86. G. M. Clore, A. T. Briinger, M. Karplus, and A. M. Gronenborn, J. Mol. Biol., 191, 523 (1986). Applications of Molecular Dynamics to Three-Dimensional Protein Structure Determination. A Model Study of Crambin.
87. A. T. Briinger, G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, and M. Karplus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 3801 (1986). Three-Dimensional Structure of Proteins Determined by Molecular Dynamics with Interproton Distance Restraints: Applications to Crambin.
88. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, Jr., and M. P. Vecchi, Science, 220, 671 (1983). Optimization by Simulated Annealing.
89. R. Carr and M. Parnnello, Phys. Rev. Lett., 55,2471 (1985). Unified Approach for Molecu-lar Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory.
90. M. Nilges, G. M. Clore, and A. M. Gronenborn, FEBS Lett., 239, 129 (1988). Determina-tion of Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins from Interproton Distance Data by Dynamical Simulated Annealing from a Random Array of Atoms.
91. Shi Yun-yu, W. Lu, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Mol. Simul., 1, 369 (1988). On the Approx-imation of Solvent Effects on the Conformation and Dynamics of Cyclosporin A by Stochastic Dynamics Simulation Techniques.
92. A. DiNola, H. J. C. Berendsen, and O. Edholm, Macromolecules, 17, 2044 (1984). Free Energy Determination of Polypeptide Conformations Generated by Molecular Dynamics.
93. R. A. Donnelly and J. W. Rogers, Jr., Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Chem. Symp., 22, 507 (1988). A Discrete Search Technique for Global Optimization.
94. R. C. van Schaik, W. F. van Gunsteren, and H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 6, 97 (1992). Conformational Search by Potential Energy Annealing: Algorithm and Applications to Cyclosporin A.
95. G. M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem., 3, 471 (1982). Conformational Analysis by Energy Embedding.
96. G. M. Crippen, Biopolymers, 21, 1933 (1982). Energy Embedding of Trypsin Inhibitor.
97. G. M. Crippen, J. Phys. Chem., 91, 6341 (1987). Why Energy Embedding Works.
98. G. M. Crippen and T. F. Havel, J. Chem. Int. Comput. Sci., 30, 222 (1990). Global Energy Minimization by Rotational Energy Embedding.
99. N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087 (1953). Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines.
100. S. H. Northrup and J. A. McCammon, Biopolymers, 19,1001 (1980). Simulation Methods for Protein Structure Fluctuations.
101. R. M. Levy, D. A. Bassolino, D. B. Kitchen, and A. Pardi, Biochemistry, 28, 9361 (1989). Solution Structures of Proteins from NMR Data and Modelling: Alternative Folds for Neutrophil Peptide 5.
102. Z. Li and H. A. Scheraga, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 6611 (1987). Monte Carlo-Minimization Approach to the Multiple-Minima Problem in Protein Folding.
103. T. Schaumann, W. Braun, and K. Wiithrich, Biopolymers, 29, 679 (1990). The Program FANTOM for Energy Refinement of Polypeptides and Proteins Using a Newton-Raphson Minimizer in Torsion Angle Space.
104. B. van Freyberg and W. Braun, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 1065 (1991). Efficient Search for All Low Energy Conformations of Polypeptides by Monte Carlo Methods.
105. M. Nilges, G. M. Clore, and A. M. Gronenborn, FEBS Lett., 229, 317 (1988). Determina-tion of Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins from Interproton Distance Data by Hybrid Distance Geometry-Dynamical Simulated Annealing Calculations.
106. M. Nilges, A. M. Gronenborn, A. T. Briinger, and G. M. Clore, Protein Engin., 2, 27 (1988). Determination of Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins by Simulated Annealing with Interproton Distance Restraints. Application to Crambin, Potato Carboxypeptidase Inhibitor, and Barley Serine Proteinase Inhibitor 2.
107. A. T. Briinger, G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, and M. Karpius, Protein Engin., 1, 399 (1987). Solution Conformations of Human Growth Hormone Releasing Factor: Comparison of the Restrained Molecular Dynamics and Distance Geometry Methods for a System without Long-Range Distance Data.
108. J. de Vlieg, R. M. Scheek, W. F. van Gunsteren, H. J. C. Berendsen, R. Kaptein, and J. Thomason, Proteins, 3, 209 (1988). Combined Procedure of Distance Geometry and Restrained Molecular Dynamics Techniques for Protein Structure Determination from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data: Application to the DNA Binding Domain of lac Repressor from Escherichia coli.
109. W. J. Metzler, D. R. Hare, and A. Pardi, Biochemistry, 28, 7045, (1989). Limited Sampling of Conformational Space by the Distance Geometry Algorithm: Implications for Structures Generated from NMR Data.
110. T. F. Havel, Biopolymers, 29, 1565 (1990). The Sampling Properties of Some Distance Geometry Algorithms Applied to Unconstrained Polypeptide Chains: A Study of 1830 Independently Computed Conformations.
111. J. Kuszewski, M. Nilges, and A. T. Briinger, J. Biomol. NMR, in press. Sampling and Efficiency of Metric Matrix Distance Geometry: A Novel Partial Metrization Algorithm.
112. W. F. van Gunsteren, in Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Vol. 71: Modelling of Molecular Structures, J-L. Rivail, Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 463-478. On Testing Theoretical Models by Comparison of Calculated with Experimental Data.
113. W. F. van Gunsteren, P. Gros, A. E. Torda, H. J. C. Berendsen, and R. C. van Schaik, in Protein Conformation, F. M. Richards, Ed., John Wiley 8c Sons, Chichester, 1991, pp. 150-166. On Deriving Spatial Protein Structure from NMR or X-Ray Diffraction Data.
114. T. F. Havel and K. Wiithrich, J. Mol Biol., 182, 281 (1985). An Evaluation of the Combined Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry for the Determination of Protein Conformations in Solution.
115. C. Gonzalez, J. A. C. Rullmann, A. M. J. J. Bonvin, R. Boelens, and R. Kaptein, J. Magn. Reson., 91, 659 (1991). Toward an NMR R Factor.
116. G. M. Clore, P. T. Wingheld, and A. M. Gronenborn, Biochemistry, 30, 2315 (1991). High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Structure of Interleukin 10 in Solution by Three-and Four-Dimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
117. G. M. Clore and A. M. Gronenborn, Prog. NMR Spectrosc, 23, 43 (1991). Applications of Three-and Four-Dimensional Heteronuclear NMR Spectroscopy to Protein Structure Determination.
118. R. E. Hoffman and G. C. Levy, Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 23, 211 (1991). Modern Methods of NMR Data Processing and Data Evaluation.
119. J. de Vlieg, H. J. C. Berendsen, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Proteins, 6, 104 (1989). An NMR Based Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Interaction of the lac Repressor Headpiece and Its Operator in Aqueous Solution.
120. J. Kallen, C. Spitzfaden, M. G. M. Zurini, G. Wider, H. Widmer, K. Wiithrich, and M. D. Walkinshaw, Nature, 353, 276 (1991). Structure of Human Cyclophilin and Its Binding Site for Cyclosporin A Determined by X-ray Crystallography and NMR Spectroscopy.
121. S. W. Fesik, R. T. Gampe, Jr., H. L. Eaton, G. Gemmecker, E. T. Olejniczak, P. Neri, T. F. Holzman, D. A. Egan, R. Edalji, R. Simmer, R. Helfrich, J. Hochlowski, and M. Jackson, Biochemistry, 30, 6574 (1991). NMR Studies of [U-'3C]Cyclosporin A Bound to Cyclophilin: Bound Conformation and Portions of Cyclosporin Involved in Binding.
122. C. Weber, G. Wider, B. von Freyberg, R. Traber, W. Braun, W. Widmer, and K. Wiithrich, Biochemistry, 30, 6563 (1991). The NMR Structure of Cyclosporin A Bound to Cyclophilin in Aqueous Solution.