Men's reactions to hypothetical forceful sexual advances from women: The role of sexual standards, relationship availability, and the beauty bias

Sex Roles

Volumn 37, Issue 5-6, 1997, Pages 319-333

  Struckman Johnson, Cindy ^a   Struckman Johnson, David ^a  

^a University of South Dakota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031483191     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1025697222123     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aizenman, M., & Kelley, G. (1988). The incidence of violence and acquaintance rape in dating relationships among college men and women. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 305-311.
2. Anderson, P. B., & Aymami, R. (1993). Reports of female initiation of sexual contact: Male and female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 335-343.
3. Cartar, L., Hicks, M., & Slane, S. (1996). Women's reactions to hypothetical male sexual touch as a function of initiator attractiveness and level of coercion. Sex Roles, 35, 737-750.
4. Long, P. J., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (April, 1987). Why some men don't say no: A comparison of men who did versus did not resist pressure to have unwanted sexual intercourse. Paper presented at the Midcontinent Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Bloomington, IN.
5. La Voie, F., & Poitras, M. (1996). A study of the prevalence of sexual coercion in adolescent heterosexual dating relationships in a Quebec sample. Victims and Violence, 4, 125-139.
6. Lottes, I. I. (1991). The relationship between nontraditional gender roles and sexual coercion. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 89-109.
7. O'Sullivan, L., & Byers, E. S., (1993). Eroding stereotypes: College women's attempts to influence reluctant male sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 270-282.
8. Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689-701.
9. Sandberg, G., Jackson, T., & Petretic-Jackson, P. (1987). College dating attitudes regarding sexual coercion and sexual aggression: Developing education and prevention strategies. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 302-310.
10. Siegel, J. M., Golding, J. M., Burnam, M. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (1990). Reactions to sexual assault: A community study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 229-246.
11. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97-120.
12. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.
13. Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, 100. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234-240.
14. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1993). College men's and women's reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level. Sex Roles, 29, 371-385.
15. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1994a). Men pressured and forced into sexual experiences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 93-114.
16. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1994b). Men's reactions to hypothetical sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 31, 387-405.
17. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (in press). The dynamics and impact of sexual coercion of men by women. In Anderson, P., & Struckman-Johnson, C. (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women: Research perspectives and controversies. New York: Guilford.
18. Struckman-Johnson, D., & Struckman-Johnson, C. (1996). College men's reactions to hypothetical forceful sexual advances from women. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 93-105.