Women's reactions to hypothetical male sexual touch as a function of initiator attractiveness and level of coercion

Sex Roles

Volumn 35, Issue 11-12, 1996, Pages 737-750

  Cartar, Lydia ^a   Hicks, Melanie ^b   Slane, Steve ^b  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030327204     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01544089     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baier, J. L., Rosenzweig, M. G, & Whipple, E. G. (1991). Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization of university students. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 310-322.
2. Barocas, R., & Karoly, P. (1972). Effects of physical appearance on social responsiveness. Psychological Reports, 31, 495-500.
3. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387-1397.
4. Christopher, F. S. (1988). An initial investigation into a continuum of premarital sexual pressure. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 255-266.
5. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
6. Jones, W. H., Hansson, R. O., & Phillips A. L. (1978). Physical attractiveness and judgments of psychopathology. The Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 79-84.
7. Kanin, E. J., & Parcell, S. R. (1977). Sexual aggression: A second look at the offended female. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 67-76.
8. O'Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students' incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435-446.
9. Ogletree, R. J. (1993). Sexual coercion experience and help-seeking behavior of college women. Journal of American College Health, 41, 149-153.
10. Sigall, H., & Landy, D. (1973). Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 218-224.
11. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1991). Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy. Sex Roles, 25, 661-676.
12. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1993). College men's and women's reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level. Sex Roles, 29, 371-385.
13. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1994). Men's reactions to hypothetical female sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 31, 387-405.
14. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.