Xenopus hindbrain patterning requires retinoid signaling

Developmental Biology

Volumn 192, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-16

  Kolm, Peggy J ^a   Apekin, Vladimir ^a   Sive, Hazel ^a  

^a WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominant negative; FGF; Hindbrain; HoxD1; Retinoic acid; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; MESSENGER RNA; RETINOIC ACID; RETINOIC ACID RECEPTOR; RETINOID;

ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MESODERM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RHOMBENCEPHALON; TERATOGENESIS; XENOPUS;

EID: 0031470754     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8754     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Amaya E., Musci T., Kirschner M. Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation inXenopus. Cell. 66:1991;257-270.
2. Amaya E., Stein P., Musci T., Kirschner M. FGF signaling in the early specification of mesoderm inXenopus. Development. 118:1993;477-487.
3. Baker B., Tata J. Accumulation of proto-oncogene c-erb-A related transcripts duringXenopus. EMBO J. 9:1990;879-885.
4. Banker D., Bigler J., Eisenman R. The thyroid hormone receptor gene (c-erbAα) is expressed in advance of thyroid gland maturation during the early embryonic development ofXenopus laevis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1991;5079-5089.
5. Banker D., Eisenman R. Thyroid hormone receptor can modulate retinoic acid-mediated axis formation in frog embryogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1993;7540-7552.
6. Blitz I., Cho K. Anterior neurectoderm is progressively induced during gastrulation: The role of theXenopusorthodenticle. Development. 121:1994;993-1004.
7. Blumberg B., Bolado J., Derguin F., Craig A., Moreno T., Chakravarti D., Heyman R., Buch J., Evans R. Novel retinoic acid receptor ligands inXenopus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4873-4878.
8. Blumberg B., Bolado J., Moreno T., Kintner C., Evans R., Papalopulu N. An essential role for retinoid signaling in anteroposterior neural patterning. Development. 124:1997;373-379.
9. Blumberg B., Mangelsdorf D., Dyck J., Bittner D., Evans R., DeRobertis E. Multiple retinoid-responsive receptors in a single cell: Families of retinoid "X" receptors and retinoic acid receptors in theXenopus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;2321-2325.
10. Bradley L., Snape A., Bhatt S., Wilkinson D. The structure and expression of theXenopus. Mech. Dev. 40:1993;73-84.
11. L. Bradley, 1993, Characterisation and functional analysis of Xenopus Krox-20, Open University, London.
12. Bradley L., Wainstock D., Sive H. Positive and negative signals modulate formation of theXenopus. Development. 122:1996;2739-2750.
13. Chen J., Evans R. A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature. 377:1995;454-457.
14. Chen Y., Huang L., Solursh M. A concentration gradient of retinoids in the earlyXenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 161:1994;70-76.
15. Cho K., DeRobertis E. Differential activation ofXenopus. Genes Dev. 4:1990;1910-1916.
16. Conlon R. Retinoic acid and pattern formation in vertebrates. Trends Genet. 11:1995;314-319.
17. Conlon R., Rossant J. Exogenous retinoic acid rapidly induces anterior ectopic expression of murine Hox-2 genesin vivo. Development. 116:1992;357-368.
18. Cox W., Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Caudalization of neural fate by tissue recombination and bFGF. Development. 121:1995;4349-4358.
19. Creech-Kraft J., Schuh T., Juchau M., Kimelman D. Temporal distribution, localization, and metabolism of all-transtransXenopus. Biochem. J. 301:1994a;111-119.
20. Creech-Kraft J., Schuh T., Juchau M., Kimelman D. The retinoid X receptor ligand, 9-cisXenopus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994b;3067-3071.
21. Damm K., Heyman R., Umesono K., Evans R. Functional inhibition of retinoic acid response by dominant negative retinoic acid receptor mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;2989-2993.
22. Doniach T. Planar and vertical induction of anteroposterior pattern during the development of the amphibian central nervous system. J. Neurobiol. 24:1993;1256-1275.
23. Doniach T., Musci T. Induction of anteroposterior pattern inXenopus. Mech. Dev. 53:1995;403-413.
24. Drysdale T., Elinson R. Development of theXenopus laevis. Development. 111:1991;469-478.
25. Dupé V., Davenne M., Brocard J., Dollé P., Mark M., Dierich A., Chambon P., Rijli F. In vivoHoxa-1. Development. 124:1997;399-410.
26. Durston A., Timmermans J., Jage W., Hendriks H., deVries N., Heidiveld M., Nieuwkoop P. Retinoic acid causes an anteroposterior transformation in the developing central nervous system. Nature. 340:1989;140-144.
27. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H., Dreyer C. A retinoic acid receptor expressed in the early development ofXenopus laevis. Genes Dev. 5:1991;94-104.
28. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H., Dreyer C. The pattern of retinoic acid receptor γ (RAR γ) expression in normal development ofXenopus laevis. Mech. Dev. 41:1993;33-46.
29. Frasch M., Chen X., Lufkin T. Evolutionary-conserved enhancers direct region-specific expression of the murineHoxa-1Hoxa-2Drosophila. Development. 121:1995;957-974.
30. Fredieu J., Cui Y., Maier D., Danilchik M., Christian J. Xwnt-8 and lithium can act upon either dorsal mesodermal or neurectodermal cells to cause a loss of forebrain inXenopus. Dev. Biol. 186:1997;100-114.
31. Gammill L., Sive H. Identification ofotx2Xenopus. Development. 124:1997;471-481.
32. Gann A., Gates P., Stark D., Brockes J. Receptor isoform specificity in a cellular response to retinoic acid. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 263:1996;729-734.
33. Godsave S., Dekker E., Holling T., Pannese M., Boncinelli E., Durston A. Expression patterns of Hoxb genes in theXenopus. Dev. Biol. 166:1994;465-476.
34. Godsave S., Durston A. Neural induction and patterning in embryos deficient in FGF signaling. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 41:1996;57-65.
35. Green J., New J., Smith J. Responses of embryonicXenopus. Cell. 71:1992;731-739.
36. Gurdon J. Embryonic induction - Molecular prospects. Development. 99:1987;285-306.
37. Harland R. In situXenopus. Methods in Cell Biology. 1991;Academic Press, San Diego. p. 685-695.
38. Hemmati-Brivanlou A., de la Torre J., Holt C., Harland R. Cephalic expression and molecular characterization ofXenopus. Development. 111:1991;715-724.
39. Hemmati-Brivanlou A., Melton D. Inhibition of activin receptor signaling promotes neuralization inXenopus. Cell. 77:1994;273-281.
40. Imakado S., Bickenbach J., Bundman D., Rothnagel J., Attar P., Wang X., Walczak V., Wisniewski S., Pote J., Gordon J., Heyman R., Evans R., Roop D. Targeting expression of a dominant-negative retinoic acid receptor mutant in the epidermis of transgenic mice results in loss of barrier function. Genes Dev. 9:1995;317-329.
41. Isaacs H., Tannahill D., Slack J. Expression of a novel FGF in theXenopus. Development. 114:1992;711-720.
42. Kao K., Elinson R. The entire mesodermal mantle behaves as Spemann's organizer in dorsoanterior enhancedXenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 127:1988;64-77.
43. Kastner P., Mark M., Chambon P. Nonsteroid nuclear receptors: What are genetic studies telling us about their role in real life? Cell. 83:1995;859-869.
44. Keller R., Shih J., Sater A. The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of theXenopus. Dev. Dyn. 193:1992;199-217.
45. Kengaku M., Okamoto H. bFGF as a possible morphogen for the anteroposterior axis of the central nervous system inXenopus. Development. 121:1995;3121-3130.
46. P. Kolm, 1997, Patterning of the posterior neurectoderm bylabial, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
47. Kolm P., Sive H. Regulation of theXenopus. Dev. Biol. 167:1995;34-49.
48. Kolm P., Sive H. Retinoids and posterior neural induction: A re-evaluation of Nieuwkoop's two-step hypothesis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 62:1997.
49. Krieg P., Melton D. Functional messenger RNAs are produced by SP6in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:1984;7057-7070.
50. Kroll K., Amaya E. TransgenicXenopus. Development. 122:1996;3173-3183.
51. Lamb T., Harland R. Fibroblast growth factor is a direct neural inducer, which combined with noggin generates anterior-posterior neural pattern. Development. 121:1995;3627-3636.
52. Leid M., Kastner P., Chambon P. Multiplicity generates diversity in the retinoic acid signalling pathways. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17:1992;427-432.
53. Maden M., Gale E., Kostetskii I., Zile M. Vitamin A-deficient quail embryos have half a hindbrain and other neural defects. Curr. Biol. 6:1996;417-426.
54. Marklew S., Smith D., Mason C., Old R. Isolation of a novel RXR fromXenopus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1278:1994;267-272.
55. Marshall H., Nonchev S., Sham M., Muchamore I., Lumsden A., Krumlauf R. Retinoic acid alters hindbrain Hox code and induces transformation of rhombomeres 2/3 into a 4/5 identity. Nature. 360:1992;737-741.
56. Marshall H., Studer M., Pöpperl H., Aparicio S., Kuiowa A., Brenner S., Krumlauf R. A conserved retinoic acid response element required for early expression of the homeobox gene Hoxb-1. Nature. 370:1994;567-571.
57. McGrew L., Lai C., Moon R. Specification of the anteroposterior neural axis through synergistic interaction of the Wnt signaling cascade withnogginfollistatin. Dev. Biol. 172:1995;337-342.
58. Nieuwkoop P. Activation and organization of the central nervous system in amphibians. III. Synthesis of a new working hypothesis. J. Exp. Zool. 120:1952;83-108.
59. Nieuwkoop P., Albers B. The role of competence in the craniocaudal segregation of the central nervous system. Dev. Growth Diff. 32:1990;23-38.
60. Nieuwkoop P., Faber J. Normal Table ofXenopus laevis. 1967;North-Holland, Amsterdam.
61. Northrop J., Kimelman D. Dorsal-ventral differences in Xcad-3 response to FGF mediated induction inXenopus. Dev. Biol. 161:1994;490-503.
62. Pannese M., Polo C., Andreazzoli M., Vignali R., Kablar B., Barsacchi G., Boncinelli E. TheXenopusOtx2. Development. 121:1995;707-720.
63. Papalopulu N., Clarke J., Bradley L., Wilkinson D., Krumlauf R., Holder N. Retinoic acid causes abnormal development and segmental patterning of the anterior hindbrain inXenopus laevis. Development. 113:1991;1145-1158.
64. Papalopulu N., Kintner C. A posteriorising factor, retinoic acid, reveals that anteroposterior patterning controls the timing of neuronal differentiation inXenopus. Development. 122:1996;3409-3418.
65. Pownall M., Tucker A., Slack J., Isaacs H. eFGF, Xcad3,Xenopus. Development. 122:1996;3881-3892.
66. Rossant J., Zirngibl R., Cado D., Shago M., Giguere V. Expression of a retinoic acid response element-hsplacZ transgene defines specific domains of transcriptional activity during mouse embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 5:1991;1333-1344.
67. Ruiz i Altaba A., Jessell T. Retinoic acid modifies the pattern of cell differentiation in the central nervous system of neurula stageXenopus. Development. 112:1991;945-958.
68. Sagerström C., Grinblat Y., Sive H. Anteroposterior patterning in the zebrafish,Danio rerio. Development. 122:1996;1873-1883.
69. Saha M., Grainger R. A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development inXenopus. Neuron. 8:1992;1003-1014.
70. Sharpe C. Retinoic acid can mimic endogenous signals involved in transformation of theXenopus. Neuron. 7:1991;239-247.
71. Sharpe C. Two isoforms of retinoic acid receptor alpha expressed duringXenopus. Mech. Dev. 39:1992;81-93.
72. Sharpe C., Fritz A., DeRobertis E., Gurdon J. A homeobox-containing marker of posterior neural differentiation shows the importance of predetermination in neural induction. Cell. 50:1987;749-758.
73. Sharpe C., Goldstone K. Retinoid receptors promote primary neurogenesis inXenopus. Development. 124:1997;515-523.
74. Sharpe C., Gurdon J. The induction of anterior and posterior neural genes inXenopus laevis. Development. 109:1990;765-774.
75. Sive H., Cheng P. Retinoic acid perturbs the expression of Xhox.lab genes and alters mesodermal determination inXenopus laevis. Genes Dev. 5:1991;1321-1332.
76. Sive H., Draper B., Harland R., Weintraub H. Identification of a retinoic acid-sensitive period during primary axis formation inXenopus laevis. Genes Dev. 4:1990;932-942.
77. Sive H., Hattori K., Weitraub H. Progressive determination during formation of the anteroposterior axis inXenopus laevis. Cell. 58:1989;171-180.
78. Slack J., Tannahill D. Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates: Lessons from the amphibians. Development. 114:1992;285-302.
79. Smith D., Mason C., Jones E., Old R. Expression of a dominant negative retinoic acid receptor γ in Xenopus embryos leads to partial resistance to retinoic acid. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 203:1994;254-265.
80. Smith W., Harland R. Injected Xwnt-8 RNA acts early inXenopus. Cell. 67:1991;753-765.
81. Song J., Slack J. XFGF-9: A new fibroblast growth factor fromXenopus. Dev. Dyn. 206:1996;427-436.
82. Taira M., Saint-Jeannet J., Dawid I. Role for theXlim-1Xbra. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;895-900.
83. Tsai S., Bartelmez S., Heyman R., Damm K., Evans R., Collins S. A mutated retinoic acid receptor-α exhibiting dominant-negative activity alters the lineage development of a multipotent hematopoietic cell line. Genes Dev. 6:1992;2258-2269.
84. Twal W., Roze L., Zile M. Anti-retinoic acid monoclonal antibody localizes all-trans. Dev. Biol. 168:1995;225-234.
85. von Bubnoff A., Schmidt J., Kimelman D. TheXenopus laevisXgbx-2. Mech. Dev. 54:1996;149-160.
86. Wright C., Morita E., Wilkin D., DeRobertis E. TheXenopus. Development. 109:1990;225-234.