Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: I. Paper-based, whole class

Academic Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1109-1112

  Schwartz, Peter L ^a   Loten, Ernest G ^a   Miller, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CURRICULUM; EXAMINATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031461257     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199712000-00025     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Muller S (chairman). Physicians for the twenty-first century: report of the project panel on the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine. J Med Educ. 1984 Nov;59(11 Pt 2).
2. Educating medical students: assessing change in medical education - the road to implementation (ACME-TRI report). Acad Med. 1993;68(6 suppl).
3. Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik JA, Kulik C-LC. Effects of frequent classroom testing. J Educ Res. 1991;85:89-99.
4. Kulik C-LC, Kulik JA. Mastery testing and stu-dent learning: a meta-analysis. J Educ Technol Systems. 1986-87;15:325-45.
5. Alley LR. An instructional epiphany. Change. 1996;28(2):49-54.
6. Miller AP, Haden P, Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: 2. Computer-based, individual. Acad Med. 1997;72:1113-5.
7. Schwartz PL. The right place at the right time: an example of innovation in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 1989;1:171-5.
8. Rolfe I, McPherson J. Formative assessment: how am I doing? Lancet. 1995;345:837-9.
9. Gronlund NE Preparing Criterion-Referenced Tests for Classroom Instruction. New York: Macmillan, 1973.