Endorectal MRI using a 0.5 T mid-field system in the staging of localized prostate cancer

Brain and Language

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 550-553

  Bates, T S ^a,d   Cavanagh, P M ^b   Speakman, M ^c   Gillatt, D A ^a  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Somerset MRI Centre   (United Kingdom)

^c TAUNTON AND SOMERSET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAGNET; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM;

EID: 22644440943     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80133-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chodak GW, Keller P Schoenberg HW. Assessment of screening for prostate cancer using the digital rectal examination. Journal of Urology 1989;141:1136-1138.
2. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. Journal of Urology 1994;151:1283-1290.
3. Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ et al. Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. Journal of Urology 1993;150:391-395.
4. Quinn SF, Franzini DA, Demlow TA et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994;190:323-327.
5. Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR Imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil. Radiology 1994;193:703-709.
6. Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Pollack HM et al, Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989;172:570-574.
7. Schiebler ML, Schnall MD, Pollack HM et al. Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 1993;189:339-352.
8. Outwater EK, Petersen RO, Siegelman ES et al. Prostate carcinoma: Assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994; 193:333-339.
9. Sogani PC, Whitmore WF. Update in staging systems. In: Bruce AW and Trachtenberg J, eds. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987:107-115.
10. Yang A, Yang S. MRI and CT of the prostate gland. In: Goldman SM and Gatewood OMB, eds. CT and MRI of the Genitourinary Tract. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:157-184.
11. Kahn T, Burrig K, Schmitz-Drager B et al. Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: MR Imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;173:847-851.
12. Schnall MD, Pollack HM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate gland. Urologic Radiology 1990;12:109-114.
13. Schnall MD, Kressel HY, Pollack KP et al. The development of an intracavitary inflatable surface coil for high resolution proton imaging and spectroscopy (Abstract). In: Book of Abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1986.
14. Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA et al. Staging of prostate cancer: results of radiology diagnostic oncology group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1994;192:47-54.
15. Jager GJ, Barentsz JO, de la Rosette JJ et al. Preliminary results of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. Radiologe 1994;34:129-133.
16. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-Institutional co-operative trial. New England Journal of Medicine 1990;323:621-626.
17. Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G et al. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term follow-up. Journal of Urology 1993;150:135-141.
18. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathological findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993;71:3582-3593.
19. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S et al. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Journal of Urology 1992;148:331-337.