Distributed knowledge revision/integration

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 121-127

  Dragoni, Aldo Franco ^a   Giorgini, Paolo ^a   Puliti, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; DATA REDUCTION; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

DISTRIBUTED KNOWLEDGE REVISION/INTEGRATION;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 0031345616     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/266714.266879     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. de Kleer J., An Assumption Based Truth Maintenance System, in Artificial Intelligence, 28, pp. 127-162,1986.
2. Dragoni A.F., A Model for Belief Revision in a Multi-Agent Environment, in Werner E. and Demazeau Y. (eds.), Decentralized A. I. 3, North Holland Elsevier Science Publisher, 1992.
3. Dragoni A.F., Belief Revision: from theory to practice, "The Knowledge Engineering Review", vol 12, no 2, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
4. Dragoni A.F., Di Manzo, M., Supporting Complex Inquiries, Int Journal of Intelligent Systems, november 1995.
5. A.F. Dragoni, P. Giorgini and P. Puliti, Distributed Belief Revision vs. Distributed Truth Maintenance, in Proc. 6th IEEE Conf. on Tools with A.I., IEEE Computer Press, 1994.
6. A.F. Dragoni, P. Giorgini, "Belief Revision through the Belief Function Formalism in a Multi-Agent Environment", Intelligent Agents III, LNAI no 1193, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
7. Dragoni, A.F., Maximal Consistency, Theory of Evidence and Bayesian Conditioning in the Investigative Domain, to appear on the "International Journal on Artificial Intelligence and Law", 1997.
8. Alchourrón C.E., Gärdenfors P., and Makinson D., On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial meet Contraction and Revision Functions, in The Journal of Simbolic Logic, 50, pp. 510-530, 1985.
9. P. Gärdenfors, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1988.
10. P. Gärdenfors, Belief Revision, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
11. W. Nebel, Base Revision Operations and Schemes: Semantics, Representation, and Complexity, in Cohn A.G. (eds.), Proc. of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
12. Benferhat S., Cayrol C, Dubois D., Lang J. and Prade H., Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment, in Proc. of the 13th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 640-645,1993.
13. Dubois D. and Prade H., A Survey of Belief Revision and Update Rules in Various Uncertainty Models, in International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 9, pp. 61-100,1994.
14. Williams M.A., Iterated Theory Base Change: A Computational Model, in Proc. of the 14th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1541-1547,1995.
15. Dragoni A.F., Mascaretti F. and Puliti P., A Generalized Approach to Consistency-Based Belief Revision, in Gori, M. and Soda, G. (Eds.), Topics in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 992, Springer Verlag, 1995.
16. Martins J.P. and Shapiro S.C. (1988), A Model for Belief Revision, in «Artificial Intelligence», 35, pp. 25-79.
17. R. Reiter, A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles, in Artificial Intelligence, 53, 1987.
18. Shafer G. and Srivastava R., The Bayesian and Belief-Function Formalisms a General Perpsective for Auditing, in G. Shafer and J. Pearl (eds.), Readings in Uncertain Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1990.
19. Shafer G. (1976), A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
20. Shafer G., Belief Functions, in G. Shafer and J. Pearl (eds.), Readings in Uncertain Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1990.
21. Kennes, R., Computational Aspects of the Möbius Transform of a Graph, IEEE Transactions in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, pp 201-223, 1992.
22. Parson, S., Some qualitative approaches to applying the Demster-Shafer theory, Information and Decision Technologies, 19, pp 321-337, 1994.
23. Moral, S. and Wilson, N., Importance Sampling Monte-Carlo Algorithms for the Calculation of Dempster-Shafer Belief, Proceeding of IPMU'96, Granada, 1996.
24. A.F. Dragoni, P. Giorgini, "Learning Agents' Reliability through Bayesian Conditioning: a simulation study", in Weiss (ed.) "Learning in DAI Systems", LNAI no 1221, Springer-Verlag, 1997.