Learning agents' reliability through bayesian conditioning: A simulation experiment

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1221 LNAI, Issue , 1997, Pages 151-167

  Dragoni, Aldo Franco ^a   Giorgini, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN CONDITIONING; BELIEF REVISION; COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE STATE; DEMPSTER'S RULE OF COMBINATION; LEARNING AGENTS; RELATIVE DEGREES; DEMPSTER;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EXPERIMENTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84890575528     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-62934-3_47     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A.F. Dragoni, P. Giorgini, "Belief Revision through the Belief Function Formalism in a Multi-Agent Environment", Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, LNAI Series, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
2. Dragoni, A.F., Ceresi, C. and Pasquali, V., A System to Support Complex Inquiries, in Proc. of the V Congreso Iberoamericano de Derecho e Infolmatica, La Habana, 6-11 march 1996.
3. Alchourrdn C.E., Gatrdenfors P., and Makinson D., On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial meet Contraction and Revision Functions, in The Journal of Simbolic Logic, 50, pp. 510-530, 1985.
4. P. Gairdenfors, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1988.
5. P. Gatrdenfors, Belief Revision, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
6. Williams M.A., Iterated Theory Base Change: A Computational Model, in Proc. of the 14th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1541-1547, 1995.
7. W. Nebel, Base Revision Operations and Schemes: Semantics, Representation, and Complexity, in Cotm A.G. (eds.), Proc. of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Jotm Wiley & Sons, 1994.
8. Benferhat S., Cayrol C., Dubois D., Lang J. and Prade H., Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment, in Proc. of the 13th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 640-645, 1993.
9. Dubois D. and Prade H., A Survey of Belief Revision and Update Rules in Various Uncertainty Models, in International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 9, pp. 61-100, 1994.
10. Dragoni A.F., Mascaretti F. and Puliti P., A Generalized Approach to Consistency-Based Belief Revision, in Gori, M. and Soda, G. (Eds.), Topics in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 992, Springer Verlag, 1995.
11. de Kleer J., An Assumption Based Truth Maintenance System, in Artificial hlteUigence, 28, pp. 127-162, 1986.
12. Sharer G. and Srivastava R., The Bayesian and Belief-Function Fommlisms a General Perpsective for Auditing, in G. Shafer and J. Pearl (eds.), Readings in Uncertain Reasoning, Morgan Kaulmalm Publishers, 1990.
13. Shafer G. (1976), A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
14. Shafer G., Belief Functions, in G. Shafer and J. Pearl (eds.), Readings in Uncertain Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1990.
15. Benferhat S., Dubois D. and Prade H., How to infer from inconsistent beliefs without revising?, in Proc. of the 14th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial intelligence, pp. 1449-1455, 1995.
16. Dragoni A.F., Belief Revision: from theory to practice, to appear on "The Knowledge Engineering Review", Cambridge University Press, 1997.
17. A.F. Dragoni, P. Giorgini and P. Puliti, Distributed Belief Revision vs. Distributed Troth Maintenance, in Proc. 6th 1EEE Conf. on Tools with A.I., IEEE Computer Press, 1994.
18. R. Reiter, A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles, in Artificial Intelligence, 53, 1987.