Detection of eukaryotic promoters using Markov transition matrices

Computers and Chemistry

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 223-227

  Audic, Stéphane ^a   Claverie, Jean Michel ^a  

^a Struct and Genetic Info Laboratory   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROBABILITY; PROMOTER REGION; TATA BOX;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); TATA BOX; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 0031299508     PISSN: 00978485     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0097-8485(96)00040-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alexandrov, N. N. and Mironov, A. A. (1990) Application of a new method of pattern recognition in DNA sequence analysis: a study of E. coli promoters. Nucleic Acids Research 18, 1847-1852.
2. Bucher, P. (1990) Weight matrix description of four eukaryotic RNA Polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 212, 563-578.
3. Bucher, P. (1996) The Eukaryotic Promoter Database EPD, EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Data Library, Release 46. European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton Hall, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1RQ, U.K.
4. Borodovsky, M. and McIninch, J. (1993) GENMARK: parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands. Computers and Chemistry 17, 123-133.
5. Claverie, J.-M. and Audic, S. (1996) The statistical significance of nucleotide position-weight matrix matches. Computers Applications in the Biosciences 12, 431-439.
6. Claverie, J.-M., Poirot, O. and Lopez, F. (1997) The difficulty of identifying genes in anonymous vertebrate sequences. Computers and Chemistry 21, 203-214.
7. Claverie, J.-M. and Sauvaget, I. (1985) Assessing the biological significance of primary structure consensus patterns using sequence databanks. I. Heat-shock and glucocorticoid control elements in eukaryotic promoters. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 1, 95-104.
8. Claverie, J.-M., Sauvaget, I. and Bougueleret, L. (1990) k-tuple frequency analysis: from intron/exon discrimination to T-cell epitope mapping. Methods in Enzymology 183, 237-252.
9. Demeler, B. and Zhou, G. W. (1991) Neural network optimization for E. coli promoter prediction. Nucleic Acids Research 19, 1593-1599.
10. Fickett, J. W. and Tung, C. (1992) Assessment of protein coding measures. Nucleic Acids Research 20, 6441-6450.
11. Hertz, G. Z. and Stormo, G. D. (1996) E. coli promoter sequences: analysis and prediction. Methods in Enzymology 273, 30-42.
12. Hirst, J. D. and Sternberg, M. J. (1992) Prediction of structural and functional features of protein and nucleic acids sequences by artificial neural networks. Biochemistry 31, 7211-7218.
13. Horton, P. B. and Kanehisa, M. (1992) An assessment of neural network and statistical approaches for prediction of E. coli promoter sites. Nucleic Acids Research 20, 4331-4338.
14. Hutchinson, G. B. (1996) The prediction of vertebrate promoter regions using differential hexamer frequency analysis. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12, 391-398.
15. Matis, S., Xu, Y., Shah, M., Guan, X., Einstein, J. R., Mural, R. and Uberbacher, E. (1996) Detection of RNA Polymerase II promoters and polyadenylation sites in human DNA sequences. Computers and Chemistry 20, 135-140.
16. Prestridge, D. S. (1995) Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. Journal of Molecular Biology 249, 923-932.
17. Wingender, E. (1994) Recognition of regulatory regions in genomic sequences. Journal of Biotechnology 35, 273-280.