Teachers' intervention preferences related to explanations for behavior problems, severity of the problem, and teacher experience

Behavioral Disorders

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 87-95

  Alderman, Gary L ^a   Nix, Marjorie ^a  

^a WINTHROP UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031287597     PISSN: 01987429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019874299702200201     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alderman, G. L., & Gimpel, G. (1996). What teachers and other educators prefer when receiving consultation about the student with behavior problems. Journal of Psychological and Educational Consultation, 7, 305-313.
2. Algozzine, K. M., Morsink, C. V., & Algozzine, B. (1986). Classroom ecology in categorical special education classrooms: And so, they counted the teeth in the horse. Journal of Special Education, 20, 209-217.
3. Agne, K. J., Greenwood, G. E., & Miller, L. D. (1994). Relationships between teacher belief systems and teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 141-152.
4. Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: MacMillan.
5. Combs, A. (1982). A personal approach to teaching: Beliefs that make a difference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Demchak, M. (1993). Functional assessment of problem behaviors in applied settings. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, 89-95.
7. Dreikurs, R., & Cassel, P. (1972). Discipline without tears: What to do with children who misbehave (Rev. ed.). New York: Hawthorn Books.
8. Elliott, S. N. (1988). Acceptability for behavioral treatments: Review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology, 19, 68-80.
9. Elliott, S. N., Witt, J. C., Galvin, G. A., & Peterson, R. (1984). Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 353-360.
10. Fowler, R. C., & Schnacker, L. E. (1994). The changing character of behavioral assessment and treatment: An historical introduction and review of functional analysis research. Diagnostique, 19, 79-102.
11. Frentz, C., & Kelly, M. L. (1986). Parents' acceptance of reductive treatment methods: The influence of problem severity and perception of child behavior. Behavior Therapy, 17, 75-81.
12. Glasser, W. (1972). Reality therapy: A new approach to psychiatry. New York: Harper and Row.
13. Hall, C. W., & Wahrman, E. (1988). Theoretical orientation and perceived acceptability of intervention strategies applied to acting-out behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 195-198.
14. Hile, M. G., & Desrochers, M. N. (1993). The relationship between functional assessment and treatment selection for aggressive behaviors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 265-274.
15. Iwata, B. A. (1994). Functional analysis methodology: Some closing comments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215-240.
16. Johnson, L. J., & Pugach, M. C. (1990). Classroom teachers' views of intervention strategies for learning and behavior problems: Which are reasonable and how frequently are they used? The Journal of Special Education, 24, 69-84.
17. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
18. Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Acceptability of time out from reinforcement procedures for disruptive child behavior. Behavior Therapy, 11, 329-344.
19. Long, N. J. (1986). The nine psychoeducational stages of helping emotionally disturbed students through the reeducation process. The Pointer, 30, 74-89.
20. Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191-198.
21. Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
22. Rose, J., & Medway, F. (1981). Measurement of teacher's beliefs in their control over student outcome. Journal of Education Research, 74, 185-190.
23. Sasso, G. M., Reimers, T. M., Cooper, L. J., Wacker, D., Berg, W., Steege, M., Kelly, L., & Allaire, A. (1992). Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 809-821.
24. Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. R. (1983). How much opportunity to respond does the minority disadvantaged student receive in the school? Exceptional Children, 49, 370-373.
25. Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1984). Opportunity to learn for LD students receiving different levels of special education services. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 55-67.
26. Tingstrom, D. H. (1989). Increasing acceptability of alternative behavioral interventions through education. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 188-194.
27. Tobin, T. (1994). Recent developments in functional assessment: Implications for school counselors and psychologists. Diagnostique, 19, 5-28.
28. Umbreit, J. (1995). Functional assessment and intervention in a regular classroom setting for the disruptive behavior of a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 267-278.
29. Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A. (1992). Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: Procedural and functional variations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 393-417.
30. Walker, H. M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
31. Witt, J. C. (1986). Teachers' resistance to the use of school-based interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 37-44.
32. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology. (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Martens, B. K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of amount of teacher time, severity of behavior problem, and type of intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 95-104.
34. Witt, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (1983). Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 510-517.
35. Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Elliot, S. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers' judgment of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.
36. Witt, J. C., Moe, G., Gutkin, T. B., & Andrews, L. (1984). The effect of saying the same thing in different ways: The problem of language and jargon in school-based consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 361-367.
37. Witt, J. C., & Robbins, J. R. (1985). Acceptability of reductive interventions for the control of inappropriate child behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 59-67.