Static and dynamic properties of patterned magnetic permalloy films

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

Volumn 175, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 10-15

  Hillebrands, B ^a   Mathieu, C ^a   Hartmanna, C ^a   Bauer, M ^a   Buttner O ^a   Riedling, S ^a   Roos, B ^a   Demokritova, S O ^a   Bartenlian, B ^b   Chappert, C ^b   Decanini, D ^c   Rousseaux, F ^c   Cambril, E ^c   Muller A ^d   Hoffmann, B ^d   Hartmann, U ^d  

^a Universität Kaiserslautern ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c Lab Microstructures Microlectron   (France)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Magnetic dots; Spin waves

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL LATTICES; DEMAGNETIZATION; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS;

MAGNETIC DOTS; PERMALLOY FILMS; SPIN WAVES;

MAGNETIC FILMS;

EID: 0031268458     PISSN: 03048853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00150-9     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. J.F. Smyth, S. Schultz, D. Kern, H. Schmidt, D. Yee, J. Appl. Phys. 63 (1988) 4237.
2. B.A. Gurney, P. Baumgart, V. Speriosu, R. Fontana, A. Patlac, T. Logan, P. Humbert, Digest of the Int. Conf. on Magnetic Films and Surfaces, Glasgow, 1991.
3. J.F. Smyth, S. Schultz, D.R. Fredkin, D.P. Kern, S.A. Rishton, H. Schmid, M. Cali, T.R. Koehler, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) 5262.
4. A. Maeda, M. Kume, T. Ogura, K. Kukori, T. Yamada, M. Nishikawa, Y. Harada, J. Appl. Phys. 76 (1994) 6667.
5. B. Hillebrands, C. Mathieu, M. Bauer, S.O. Demokritov, B. Bartenlian, C. Chappert, D. Decanini, F. Rousseaux, F. Carcenac, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997) 4993.
6. C. Mathieu, C. Hartmann, M. Bauer, O. Büttner, S. Riedling, B. Roos, S.O. Demokritov, B. Hillebrands, B. Bartenlian, C. Chappert, D. Decanini, F. Rousseaux, E. Cambril, A. Müller, B. Hoffmann, U. Hartmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (1997) 2912.
7. R.W. Damon, J.R. Eshbach, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19 (1961) 308.
8. F. Rousseaux, D. Decanini, F. Carcenac, E. Cambril, M.F. Ravet, C. Chappert, N. Bardou, B. Bartenlian, P. Veillet, J. Vac. Technol. B 13 (1995) 2787.
9. Eqs. (1) and (2) describe in good approximation the observed gross feature of the shape effects also in presence of anisotropies, since the anisotropy contributions are small.
10. P.A. Kolodin, B. Hillebrands, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 161 (1996) 199.
11. The data of the 1/2 μm sample show, compared to the 1/1.1 μm sample, a larger scatter in the data due to the smaller light scattering cross section caused by the lower magnetic coverage, but the data indicate clearly, that no significant fourfold anisotropy contribution is present in this sample.
12. B. Hillebrands, Phys. Rev. B 44 (1990) 530.