Validation by school nurses of the nursing intervention classification for computer software

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 333-338

  Redes, Sharon ^a   Lunney, Margaret ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Interventions; School nursing; Software; Validation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL HEALTH NURSING; UNITED STATES;

CLASSIFICATION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOL NURSING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031262162     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-199711000-00025     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC. Nursing interventions: Treatments for Nursing Diagnoses. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1985.
2. Snyder M. Independent Nursing Interventions. New York, NY: Wiley Medical; 1985.
3. Grobe SJ. Nursing intervention lexicon and taxonomy study: Language and classification methods. In: KG Lun, ed. MEDINFO 92: Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on Medical Informatics. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1992:981-986.
4. Iowa Intervention Project. In: McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM, eds. Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC). 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Yearbook; 1996.
5. Martin K, Sheet N. The Omaha System: Applications for Community Health Nursing. Philadelphia, PA: WVB Saunders; 1992.
6. Saba V. The classification of home health care nursing: Diagnoses and interventions. Caring. 1992;! 1:50-57.
7. Snyder M. Independent Nursing Interventions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley Medical; 1992.
8. Leske J, Werley H. Use of the nursing minimum data set. Compitt Nurs. 1992;10:259-263.
9. Ryan P, Delaney C. Nursing minimum data set. Ann Rev Nurs Res. 1995;13:169-194.
10. Werley HH, Ryan P, Zorn CR. The Nursing Minimum Data Set: A framework for the organization of nursing language. In: American Nurses Association. Nursing Data Systems: The Emerging Framework. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1995:19-30.
11. Andrew WF, Dick RS. Applied information technology: A clinical perspective. Feature focus: The computerbased patient record (part 1). Comput Nurs. 1995;13: 80-84.
12. Andrew WF, Dick RS. Applied information technology: A clinical perspective. Feature focus: The computer-based patient record (part 2). Compitt Nttrs. 1995;13: 118-122.
13. Andrew WF, Dick RS. Applied information technology: A clinical perspective. Feature focus: The Computerbased patient record (part 3). Compitt Nitrs. 1995;13: 176-181.
14. Delaney C, Mehmert P, Prophet C, Bellinger S, Huber D, Ellerbe S. Standardized nursing language for healthcare information systems .] Med Sys. 1992;16:145-159.
15. Lang NM, Hudgings C, Jacox A, et al. Toward a national database for nursing practice. In: American Nurses Association. Nursing Data Systems: The Emerging Framework. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1995:7-17.
16. Bowles KH, Naylor MD. Nursing intervention classification systems. Image. 1996;28:303-308.
17. Snyder M, Egan EC, Nojima Y. Defining nursing interventions. Image. 1996;8:137-141.
18. Lunney M. The significance of nursing classification systems to school nursing. J Sell Nurs. 1995;12:35-37.
19. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing diagnoses: Definitions and Classification, 1995-1996. Philadelphia, PA: North American Nursing Diagnosis Association; 1994.
20. Iowa Outcomes Project. In: M Johnson, M Maas, eds. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. ?
21. Waltz CF, Strickland ÖL, Lenz ER. Measurement in Nursing Research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 1991.
22. Fawcett J, Buhle, EL. Using the Internet for data collection. Comput Nurs. 1995;13:72-279.
23. Microsoft Office Professional Version 7.0. [computer program]. 1995.
24. Lunney M, Cavendish R, Luise, BK, Richardson K. Relevance of NANDA diagnoses and health promotion diagnoses to school nursing. J Sch Nurs. In press.
25. Sell RL. Letters to the editor: Research and the Internet: An e-mail survey of sexual orientation. Am ] Pub Health. 1997;87:297.