The Effectiveness of Mitochondrial rRNA Gene Sequences for the Reconstruction of the Phylogeny of an Insect Order (Orthoptera)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 177-192

  Flook, P K ^a   Rowell, C H F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME RNA; RNA; RNA, MITOCHONDRIAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CONFORMATION; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; GENE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORTHOPTERA; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, INSECT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; ORTHOPTERA; PHYLOGENY; RNA; RNA, RIBOSOMAL;

EID: 0031255042     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0425     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allard M. W. An empirical example of parsimony behaviour. Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction. 1994;Clarendon, Oxford. p. 231-248.
2. Ammerman L. K., Hillis D. M. A molecular test of bat relationships: Monophyly or diphyly? Syst. Biol. 41:1992;222-232.
3. Asakawa S., Kumazawa Y., Araki T., Himeno H., Miura K., Watanabe K. Strand-specific nucleotide composition bias in echinoderm and vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 32:1991;511-520.
4. Avise J. C., Arnold J., Ball R. M., Bermingham E., Lamb T., Neigel J. E., Reeb C. A., Saunders N. C. Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:1987;489-522.
5. Ballard J. W. O., Olsen G. J., Faith D. P., Odgers W. A., Rowell D. M., Atkinson P. W. Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science. 258:1992;1345-1348.
6. Bandelt H.-J., Dress A. W. M. Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:1992;242-252.
7. Black W. C., Piesman J. Phylogeny of hard- and soft-tick taxa (Acari: Ixodida) based on mitochondrial 16s rDNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;10034-10038.
8. Brower A. V. Z., DeSalle R. Practical and theoretical considerations for choice of a DNA sequence region in insect molecular systematics, with a short review of published studies using nuclear gene regions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:1994;702-716.
9. Brown W. M., George M., Wilson A. C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:1979;1967-1971.
10. Bull J. J., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W., Swofford D. L., Waddell P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
11. Cameron R., Brown W. M., Wilson A. C. Multiple origins of advanced eusociality in bees inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;8687-8691.
12. Carmean D., Kimsey L. S., Berbee M. L. 18S rDNA sequences and the holometabolous insects. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:1992;270-278.
13. Carpenter F. M. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. 1992;Univ. of Kansas Press, Lawrence.
14. Cho S., Mitchell A., Regier J., Mitter C., Poole R., Friedlander T., Zhao S. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: Elongation factor-1-alpha recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;650-656.
15. Clary D. O., Wolstenholme D. R. The ribosomal RNA genes of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:1985;4029-4045.
16. Crozier R. H., Crozier Y. C. The cytochrome band ATPase genes of honeybee mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;474-482.
17. Derr J. N., Davis S. K., Wooley J. B., Wharton R. A. Reassessment of the 16s rRNA nucleotide sequence from members of the parasitic Hymenoptera. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:1992;338-341.
18. DeSalle R., Freedman T., Prager E. M., Wilson A. C. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26:1987;157-164.
19. DeSalle R., Gatesy J., Wheeler W., Grimaldi D. DNA sequences from a fossil termite in Oligo-Miocene amber and their phylogenetic implications. Science. 257:1992;1933-1936.
20. Dixon M. T., Hillis D. M. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: Compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;256-267.
21. Doolittle R. F., Feng D. F., Tsang S., Cho G., Little E. Determining divergence times of the major kingdoms of living organisms with a protein clock. Science. 271:1996;470-477.
22. Dowton M., Austin A. D. Molecular phylogeny of the insect order Hymenoptera: Apocritan relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;9911-9915.
23. Dowton M., Austin A. D. Increased genetic diversity in mitochondrial genes is correlated with the evolution of parasitism in the Hymenoptera. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1995;958-965.
24. Fang Q., Black W. C., Blocker H. D., Whitcomb R. F. A phylogeny of New WorldDeltocephalus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1993;119-131.
25. Fitch W. M. Cautionary remarks on using gene expression events in parsimony procedures. Syst. Zool. 28:1979;375-379.
26. P. K. Flook, C. H. F. Rowell, 1997a, A Molecular Phylogeny of the Orthoptera Based on Large Subunit Nuclear Ribosomal RNA Sequences.
27. Flook P. K., Rowell C. H. F. The phylogeny of the Caelifera (Insecta, Orthoptera) as deduced from mt rRNA gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1997b.
28. Flook P. K., Rowell C. H. F., Gellissen G. The sequence, organisation and evolution of theLocusta migratoria. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1995;928-941.
29. Friedlander T. P., Regier J. C., Mitter C., Wagner D. L. A nuclear gene for higher level phylogenetics: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase tracks Mesozoic age differences within Lepidoptera (Insecta). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;594-604.
30. Funk D., Futuyma D., Orti G., Meyer A. Mitochondrial DNA sequences and multiple data sets: A phylogenetic study of phytophagous beetles (Chrysomelidae: Ophraella). Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;627-640.
31. D. G. Gilbert, 1992, LoopDloop, a Macintosh program for visualising RNA secondary structure, Published electronically on the Internet, available via anonymous ftp to ftp.bio.indiana.edu.
32. Gutell R. R. Collection of large subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1994. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;3502-3507.
33. Hickson R. E., Simon C., Cooper A., Spicer G. S., Sullivan J., Penny D. Conserved sequence motifs, alignment and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12s rRNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;150-169.
34. Hillis D. M. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;278-294 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
35. Hillis D. M., Dixon M. T. Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66:1991;411-453.
36. Hillis D. M., Huelsenbeck J. P. Signal, noise and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Heredit. 83:1992;189-195.
37. Hillis D. M., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science. 264:1994;671-677.
38. Howland D. E., Hewitt G. M. Phylogeny of the Coleoptera based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I sequence data. Insect Mol. Biol. 4:1995;203-215.
39. D. Huson, R. Wetzel, 1994, SplitsTree, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld.
40. Jermiin L. S., Crozier R. H. The cytochrome b region in the mitochondrial DNA of the antTetraponera rufoniger: J. Mol. Evol. 38:1994;282-294.
41. Kambhampati S. A phylogeny of cockroaches and related insects based on DNA sequence of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;2017-2020.
42. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:1980;111-120.
43. Kjer K. M. Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: An example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:1995;314-330.
44. Kuhner M., Felsenstein J. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;459-468.
45. S. Kumar, K. Tamura, M. Nei, 1993, MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, The Pennsylvania State Univ. University Park, PA, 16802.
46. Liu H., Beckenbach A. T. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:1992;41-52.
47. Lockhart P. J., Howe C. J., Bryant D. A., Beanland T. J., Larkum A. W. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 34:1992;153-162.
48. Lockhart P. J., Steel M. A., Hendy M. D., Penny D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;605-612.
49. W. P. Maddison, D. R. Maddison, 1992, MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
50. Nigro L., Grapputo A. Evolution of the mitochondrial rRNA in theorientalDrosophila. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21:1993;79-83.
51. Pashley D. P., McPheron B. A., Zimmer E. A. Systematics of holometabolous insect orders based on 18S ribosomal RNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1993;132-142.
52. Penny D., Hendy M. D., Steel M. A. Testing the theory of descent. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;155-183 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
53. Penny D., Lockhart P. J., Steel M. A., Hendy M. D. The role of models in reconstructing evolutionary trees. Scotland R. W., Siebert D. J., Williams D. M. Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction. 1994;211-230 Clarendon, Oxford.
54. Ross A. J., Jarzembowski E. A. Arthropoda (Hexapoda: Insecta). Benton I., Whyte M. A. The Fossil Record. 1993;363-426 Chapman and Hall, London.
55. Russo C. A. M., Takezaki N., Nei M. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;525-536.
56. Simon C. Molecular systematics at the species boundary. Exploiting conserved and variable regions of the mitochondrial genome of animals via direct sequencing from amplified DNA. Hewitt G. M., Johnston A. W. B., Young J. P. W. Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy. NATO ASI Series. 1991;33-71 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
57. Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:1994;651-701.
58. Simon C., Pääbo S., Kocher T., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the mitochondrial ribosomal RNA in insects as shown by the polymerase chain reaction. Clegg M., O'Brien S. J. Molecular Evolution. 1990;A. R. Liss, New York.
59. Sullivan J., Holsinger K. E., Simon C. The effect of topology on estimates of among-site rate variation. J. Mol. Evol. 42:1996;308-312.
60. D. L. Swofford, 1993, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
61. Swofford D. L., Olsen G. J., Waddell P. J., Hillis D. M. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis D. M., Moritz C., Mable B. K. Molecular Systematics. 1996;407-514 Sinnauer Associates, Sunderland.
62. Tajima F., Nei M. Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:1984;269-285.
63. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;512-526.
64. Uhlenbusch I., McCracken A., Gellissen G. The gene for the large (16S) ribosomal RNA from theLocusta migratoria. Curr. Genet. 11:1987;631-638.
65. van de Peer Y., van den Broeck I., de Rijk P., de Wachter R. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;3488-3494.
66. Vogler A. P., DeSalle R. Phylogeographic patterns in North American tiger beetles,Cincindela dorsalis, Evolution. 47:1993;1192-1202.
67. Wheeler W., Honeycutt R. L. Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: Evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:1988;90-96.
68. Xiong B., Kocher T. D. Phylogeny of sibling species ofSimulium venustumS. verecundum. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1993;293-303.