-
1
-
-
0003647187
-
-
Wiley, New York, Section 8.2
-
R. Adler, L. Chu, R. Fano, Electromagnetic Energy Transmission and Radiation, Wiley, New York, 1960 Section 8.2.
-
(1960)
Electromagnetic Energy Transmission and Radiation
-
-
Adler, R.1
Chu, L.2
Fano, R.3
-
2
-
-
0028516634
-
-
and references therein
-
I.K. Schuller, Solid State Comm. 92 (1994) 141-147 and references therein.
-
(1994)
Solid State Comm.
, vol.92
, pp. 141-147
-
-
Schuller, I.K.1
-
3
-
-
0003591312
-
-
VCH; Weinheim, Germany
-
E. Budevski, G. Staikov, W. Lorenz, Electrochemical Phase Formation and Growth, VCH; Weinheim, Germany, 1996.
-
(1996)
Electrochemical Phase Formation and Growth
-
-
Budevski, E.1
Staikov, G.2
Lorenz, W.3
-
5
-
-
30244503374
-
-
note
-
j, is verisimiltudinous at all points and directions in our bimetallic structure.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0003852007
-
-
sw (Eq. (2)), Eq. (8-37) for γ (Eq. (5)), Eq. (8-25) with Eq. (7-92) for η (Eq. (3))
-
sw (Eq. (2)), Eq. (8-37) for γ (Eq. (5)), Eq. (8-25) with Eq. (7-92) for η (Eq. (3)).
-
(1983)
Field and Wave Electromagnetics
-
-
Cheng, D.1
-
13
-
-
30244437191
-
-
note
-
Provided that we remain self-consistent and do not accept conductivities so large or thicknesses so small that we violate our continuum assumption. See the relevant discussion in endnote [25].
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
0003904786
-
-
Wiley, New York, Section 6.08
-
S. Ramo, J. Whinnery, T. Van Duzer, Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics, Wiley, New York, 1965 Section 6.08.
-
(1965)
Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics
-
-
Ramo, S.1
Whinnery, J.2
Van Duzer, T.3
-
18
-
-
0003852007
-
-
Addison-Wesley, London, Sections 8-3.2 and 7-7.3
-
D. Cheng, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, Addison-Wesley, London, 1983 Sections 8-3.2 and 7-7.3.
-
(1983)
Field and Wave Electromagnetics
-
-
Cheng, D.1
-
19
-
-
30244461435
-
-
Addison-Wesley, London, Section 5.15. Unlike the more general conditions qualifying Eq. (10), this referenced method used to relate H and K forbids interleaving layers which do not satisfy the good-conductor approximation. This reference denotes the surface current by the symbol J (which we reserve for the areal current density) while we use the more conventional symbol K to denote the surface current
-
S. Ramo, J. Whinnery, T. Van Duzer, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, Addison-Wesley, London, 1983, Section 5.15. Unlike the more general conditions qualifying Eq. (10), this referenced method used to relate H and K forbids interleaving layers which do not satisfy the good-conductor approximation. This reference denotes the surface current by the symbol J (which we reserve for the areal current density) while we use the more conventional symbol K to denote the surface current.
-
(1983)
Field and Wave Electromagnetics
-
-
Ramo, S.1
Whinnery, J.2
Van Duzer, T.3
-
20
-
-
30244461435
-
-
Addison-Wesley, London, Section 5.15. Eq. 5.14(3)
-
S. Ramo, J. Whinnery, T. Van Duger, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, Addison-Wesley, London, 1983 (Section 5.15. Eq. 5.14(3)).
-
(1983)
Field and Wave Electromagnetics
-
-
Ramo, S.1
Whinnery, J.2
Van Duger, T.3
-
21
-
-
30244510148
-
-
to be published. Derives a different expression for the surface impedance which uses an alternate basis for the solution of the Helmholtz equation, than that used in Eq. (16). The advantage of this alternate formulation is that is possesses more obvious limiting forms in k and ξ
-
P. Beeli, to be published. Derives a different expression for the surface impedance which uses an alternate basis for the solution of the Helmholtz equation, than that used in Eq. (16). The advantage of this alternate formulation is that is possesses more obvious limiting forms in k and ξ.
-
-
-
Beeli, P.1
-
23
-
-
30244491929
-
-
note
-
2 and d » 3 Å). Thus these five lines of constant thickness serve to give boundaries of the validity of our continuum approximation. The boundaries also give the experimentalist, who wishes to probe the classical/quantum metallic boundary, relevant structures to consider. (The d = 3 μm and 3 mm structure lines serve as a reference.) The above discussion assumes that δ is a meaningful quantity. When the mean free path approaches and exceeds the computed δ (or when quantum mechanical effects destroy the assumed linearity in material parameters), δ ceases to retain its meaningfulness and our development cannot be expected to be verisimiltudinous. The relative permittivity and permeability is taken to be unity in all three regions, and f = 10.0 GHz.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
30244558749
-
-
note
-
14 ℧/m for f = 10 GHz.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
30244476256
-
-
note
-
The first and the third requirement emerge from the conditions related to our application of Poynting's Theorem and the second requirement is to satisfy the requirements of Eq. (11).
-
-
-
|