MRI diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament lesions: Comparison of 1.0 T and 0.2 T. Early results;MRT-Diagnose von Lasionen am vorderen Kreuzband - Vergleich von 1,0 Tesla und 0,2 Tesla: Erste Ergebnisse

Radiologe

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 807-811

  Bankier, A ^a   Breitenseher, M ^a   Trattnig, S ^a   Gabler C ^b   Flieder, U ^a   Dorffner, R ^a   Imhof, H ^a  

^a UNIV KLIN FÜR RADIODIAGNOSTIK   (Austria)

^b LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament lesions; Comparison of systems; MRI diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE INJURY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; KNEE INJURIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031241312     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001170050286     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Brandser EA, Riley MA, Berbaum KS, El-Khoury GY, Bennett DL (1996) MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament injury: independent value of primary and secondary signs. Am J Roentgenol 167: 121-126
2. Ekelund L, Björnebrink J, Elmquist LG (1991) Ultra low field magnetic resonance imaging of acute cruciate ligament tears. Magn Reson Imaging 9: 179-185
3. Glachow JL, Katz R, Schneider M, Scott N (1989) Double-blind assessment of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate and meniscal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71: 113-119
4. Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Hof N, Lenz M, Gerhard P (1996) MRI of peripheral joints with a low field dedicated system: a reliable and cost effective alternative to high field units? Eur Radiol 6: 561-565
5. Kersting-Sommerhof B, Gerhard P, Golder W, Hof N, Riel KA, Hlemberger, Lenz M, Lehner K (1995) MRT des Kniegelenks: erste Ergebnisse eines Vergleichs von 0.2 T Spezialsystem mit 1.5 T Hochfeldmagnet. Fortschr Röntgenstr 162: 390-395
6. Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, Ahovuo J, Toivakka SK, Tulikoura I, Karjalainen T (1994) Diagnostic performance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 12: 1155-1160
7. Masciocchi C (1996) Dedicated MR system and acute trauma of the musculo-skeletal system. Eur J Radiol 22: 7-10
8. Minami M, Yoshikawa K, Matsuoka Y, Itai Y, Kokubo T, lio M (1991) MR study of normal joint function using a low field strenght system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15: 1017-1023
9. Mink JH, Levy T, Crues JV (1988) Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR evaluation. Radiology 167: 769-774
10. Orrison WW, Stimac GK, Stevens EA, LaMasters DL, Espinosa MC, Cobb L, Mettler FA (1991) Comparison of CT, low field strenght MR imaging, and high field strenght MR imaging. Radiology 181: 121-127
11. Ziedses de Plantes BG, Koster K (1995) Comparison of low field versus high field MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 20: 156-158