Nonlinear coherent excitonic solid gates for quantum computation

IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences

Volumn E80-A, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 1610-1615

  Matsueda, Hideaki ^a,b   Takeno, Shozo ^a  

^a KOCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dipole dipole interaction; Nonlinear localized excitonic mode; Quantum dot; Quantum gate

Indexed keywords

EXCITONS; NONLINEAR NETWORK ANALYSIS; QUANTUM THEORY; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

DIPOLE DIPOLE INTERACTION; NONLINEAR COHERENT EXCITONIC SOLID GATES;

LOGIC GATES;

EID: 0031220526     PISSN: 09168508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. R.P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. vol.21, p.467, 1982, Optics News, vol.11, no.ll, 1985, Foundations of Phys., vol.16, p.507, 1986.
2. P.W. Shor, in S. Goldwasser ed., Proc. 35th Annual Symp. on the Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, p. 124, 1994.
3. W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev., vol.A 51, p.992, 1995.
4. O.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev., vol.A 51, p.1015, 1995, Science, vol.270, p.255, 1995.
5. S. Haroche and J.M. Raimond, Phys. Today, vol.49, p.51, 1996.
6. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev., vol.A 53, p.2986, 1996.
7. H. Matsueda and S. Takeno, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals Electron., Commun, and Computer Sci., vol.E79-A, p. 1707, 1996.
8. H. Matsueda and S. Takeno, in T. TofToli, M. Biafore, and J. Leoo eds., Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Physics and Computation (PhysComp'96) (New England Complex Syst. Inst., Cambridge, 1996) p.215, to be also published in Physica D (1997); in J. Pfibyl ed., Proc. 1st. Int. Conf. on the Theory and Appl. of Cryptology (Pragocrypt'96) (GC UCMP, Praha, 1996) p.225.
9. H. Matsueda and S. Takeno, submitted to Phys. Rev. A, 1997.
10. S. Takeno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., vol.62, p.2894, 1993.
11. A.J. Sievers and S. Takeno, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol.61, p.970, 1988, S. Takeno, K. Kisoda and A.J. Sievers, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., no.94, p.242, 1988.
12. A.T. Amos, in "Modern Quantum Chemistry" ed. O. Sinanoglu, Academic Press, New York, Pt. 3, Chap. 11, 1965.
13. A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, O.P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev., vol.A 52, p.3457, 1995.
14. S. Lloyd, Science, vol.261, p.1569, 1993, Scientific American, vol.273, p.44, 1995.
15. V. Bulovic, P.E. Burrows, S.R. Forrest, J.A. Cronin, M.E. Thompson, Chemical Phys., vol.210, p.l, 1996, V. Bulovic, and S.R. Forrest, Chemical Phys., vol.210, p.13, 1996.
16. The quantum super-parallel processing employing the entanglements of states among different bit lines, is verified in terms of quantum logics. The physically implemented blocks of the three dimensional quantum dots, exactly correspond to the logical blocks in mathematical theory of quantum logics, being the units that behave as elements in the Boolean algebra; H. Matsueda, "Solid State Quantum Computing Circuits of Quantum Logical Blocks," Proc. The European Conf. on Circuit Theory and Design (ECCTD'97, Budapest, 1997), 6pp.
17. private communication with H.F. Hofmann and G. Mahler at University of Stuttgart, 1996.
18. J.I. Cirac, T. Pellizzari, and P. Zoller, Science, vol.273, p. 1207, 1996.
19. C. Monroe, D.M. Meekhof, B.E. King, W.M. Itano, and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol.75, p.4714, 1995.