The Use of Assembled Phonology during Performance of a Letter Recognition Task and Its Dependence on the Presence and Proportion of Word Stimuli

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 167-189

  Hooper, Dean A ^a   Paap, Kenneth R ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031208926     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2520     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baron, J., & Thurston, I. (1973). An analysis of the word superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207-228.
2. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
3. Chastain, G. (1981). Phonological and orthographic factors in the word superiority effect. Memory and Cognition, 9, 389-397.
4. Chastain, G. (1986). Visually-presented letter strings typically are encoded phonologically: Some converging evidence. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 147-157.
5. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.
6. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VI, pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 353-372.
8. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119-122.
9. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
10. Hawkins, H. L., Reicher, G. M., Rogers, M., & Peterson, L. (1976). Flexible coding in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(3), 380-385.
11. Johnston, J. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1980). Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 503-524.
12. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological. 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
13. McCann, R. S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of the word-frequency effect in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24.
14. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
15. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1989). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
17. Naish, P. (1980). The effects of graphemic and phonemic similarity between targets and masks in a backward visual masking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 57-68.
18. Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical-decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance (Vol. XII, pp. 221-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
20. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
21. Paap, K. R., Noel, R. W., & Johansen, L. S. (1992). Dual-route models of print to sound: Red herrings and real horses. In R. Frost and L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 293-318). North-Holland: Elsevier.
22. Perfetti, C. L., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.
23. Perfetti, C. L., Bell, L., & Delaney, S. (1988). Automatic phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.
24. Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. In R. Frost and L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 227-248). North-Holland: Elsevier.
25. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
26. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed-developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
27. Seidenberg, M. S., Petersen, A., MacDonald, M. C., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 48-62.
28. Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 21-34.
29. Stone, G. O., & van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 744-774.
30. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.
31. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
32. Verstaen, A., Humphreys, G. W., Olson, A., & D'Ydewalle, G. (1995). Are phonemic effects in backward masking evidence for automatic prelexical activation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 335-356.
33. Weber, R. M. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors. Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 427-451.
34. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.
35. Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567-593.