Effect of the geometry of the intraoral position-indicating device on effective dose

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 101-109

  Cederberg, Robert A ^a,b   Frederiksen, Neil L ^a   Benson, Byron W ^a   Sokolowski, Thaddeus W ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH PHYSICS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; RADIATION DOSE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH PHYSICS; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY;

EID: 0031182571     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90304-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barr J, Stephens R. Dental radiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980. p. 35.
2. Winkler K. Influence of rectangular collimation and intraoral shielding on radiation dose in dental radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1968;77:95-101.
3. Ice RD, Updegrave WJ, Bogucki EL. Influence of dental radiographic cones on radiation exposure. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;83:1297-302.
4. Weissman D, Sobkowski F. Comparative thermoluminescent dosimetry of intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions. Swed Dent J 1986;10:59-71.
5. Greer DF. Determination and analysis of absorbed doses resulting from various intraoral radiographic techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34:146-62.
6. Alcox RW. Biological effects and radiation protection in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am 1978;22:517-32.
7. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Food and Drugs. A codification of documents of general applicability and future effect. Code of Federal Regulations. 1994.
8. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health. Analysis of suggested amendment to the performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components (21 CFR 1020.30 - 1020.32): to require provision of open-ended, shielded, position-indicating devices of dental intraoral x-ray equipment. 1975.
9. Radiation protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977:[ICRP publication 26].
10. Radiation protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990:[ICRP publication 60].
11. Goaz PW, White SC. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994.
12. Radiation dosimetry: x-rays generated at potentials of 5 to 150 kV. Washington [DC]: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1970:[ICRU report 17].
13. Ellis RE. The distribution of active bone marrow in the adult. Phys Med Biol 1961;5:255-8.
14. Boswick JA. The art and science of burn care. Rockville [MD]: Aspen Publishers; 1987.
15. Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The physics of radiology. 4th ed. Springfield [IL]: Charles C. Thomas; 1983.
16. Gibbs SJ. Influence of organs in the ICRP's remainder on effective dose equivalent computed for diagnostic radiation exposures. Health Phys 1989;56:515-20.
17. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;23:123-7.
18. Avendanio B, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from detailed narrow beam radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:713-9.
19. White SC. 1992 assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:118-26.
20. Underhill TE, Chilvaquer I, Kimura K, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Preece JW, et al. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part 1. Absorbed doses to critical organs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:111-20.
21. Strenstrom B, Henrikson C, Karlsson L, Sarby B. Effective dose equivalent from intraoral radiography. Swed Dent J 1987;11:71-7.
22. Gibbs SJ, Pujol A, Chen T-S, James A. Patient risk from intraoral dental radiography. Dentomaxiilofac Radiol 1988;17:15-23.
23. Potter B, Shrout M, Harrell J. Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:532-5.
24. Velders XL, Aken J, van der Stelt PF. Risk assessment from bitewing radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:209-13.