Effective dose and risk assessment from detailed narrow beam radiography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 713-719

  Avendanio, Bernard ^a   Frederiksen, Neil L ^a   Benson, Byron W ^b   Sokolowski, Thaddeus W ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROTATION; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

HUMANS; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROTATION; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY;

EID: 0030341607     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80448-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hansen BF. Clinical and roentgenologic caries detection: a comparison. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980;9:34-6.
2. Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Wijesinha A, Chauncey HH, Kapur KK, McNeil BJ. Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:330-9.
3. White SC, Hollender L, Gratt BM. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:755-9.
4. White SC, Gratt BM, Bauer JG. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;65:242-8.
5. Mejàre I, Gröndahl H-G, Carlstedt A-CG, Ottosson E. Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:178-84.
6. Zeichner SJ, Ruttimann UE, Webber RL. Dental radiography: efficacy in the assessment of intraosseous lesions of the face and jaws in asymptomatic patients. Radiology 1987;162: 691-5.
7. White SC, Hollender L, Gratt BM. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of periapical lesions. J Dent Res 1984;63:910-3.
8. White SC, Gratt BM Hollender L. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of calculus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1984;13:39-43.
9. Dove SB, McDavid WD. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:127-34.
10. Wenzel A. New caries diagnostic methods. J Dent Educ 1993;57:428-32.
11. Tammisalo E, Hallikainen D, Kanerva H, Tammisalo T. Comprehensive oral x-ray diagnosis: Scanora multimodal ra-
12. diography. A preliminary description. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:9-15.
13. Tammisalo EH, Tammisalo T. Multimodal radiography: a new imaging technique and system for oral diagnosis. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1991;87:259-70.
14. Tammisalo T, Luostarinen T, Vahatalo K, Tammisalo EH. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;22:183-7.
15. Tammisalo T, Vahatalo K, Luostarinen T, Leimola-Virtanen R, Tammisalo EH. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periodontal pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:97-101.
16. Tammisalo T, Happonen R-P, Tammisalo EH. Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in relation to the roots of impacted lower third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:85-9.
17. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Goaz PW. Localization of a displaced root fragment by stereoscopy and pluridirectional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:99-101.
18. Fields RT, Frederiksen NL. Facial trauma confusing the diagnosis of a bifid condyle. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22:216-7.
19. ICRP Publication 60. Radiation protection. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon, 1990.
20. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;23:123-7.
21. UNSCEAR 1977. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 1977 Report to the General Assembly with Annexes. New York: United Nations, 1977.
22. ICRU Report 17. Radiation dosimetry: x-rays generated at potentials of 5 to 150 kV. Washington, DC: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1970.
23. Goaz PW, White SC. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. Third edition. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc., 1994.
24. Ellis RE. The distribution of active bone marrow in the adult. Phys Med Biol 1961;5:255-8.
25. ICRP Publication 23. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon, 1975.
26. Boswick JA. The art and science of burn care. Rockville: Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1987.
27. Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The physics of radiology. Fourth edition. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 1983.
28. Gibbs SJ. Influence of organs in the ICRP's remainder on effective dose equivalent computed for diagnostic radiation exposures. Health Phys 1989;56:515-20.
29. Stenstruom B, Julin P, Karlsson L. Comparison between panoramic radiographic techniques. Part IV: absorbed doses and energy imparted from the Orthopantomograph, model OP10. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1987;16:11-5.
30. Nakfoor CA, Brooks SL. Compliance of Michigan dentists with radiographic safety recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:510-3.
31. Bohay RN, Kogon SL, Stephens RG. A survey of radiographic techniques and equipment used by a sample of general dental practitioners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:806-10.