The International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP): Nursing Outcomes

International Nursing Review

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 121-124

  Clark, June ^a   Lang, Norma ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

International classification for nursing practice; Nursing outcomes

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW;

HUMANS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 0031179413     PISSN: 00208132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alberta Association of Registered Nurses (1994). Client status, nursing intervention and client outcome classification systems: A discussion paper. Alberta Association of Registered Nurses Ad Hoc Committee on Health Information.
2. Aydelotte M. (1962). The use of patient welfare as a criterion measure. Nursing Research, 11, 10-14.
3. Barriball, K. & Mackenzie, A. (1993). Measuring the impact of nursing interventions in the community: A selective review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 401-407.
4. Casey, A. (1996). Personal communication.
5. Clark, J. (1996). How nurses can participate in the development of the ICNP. International Nursing Review, 43(6), 2171-174.
6. International Council of Nurses (1991). Nursing's Next Advance: Development of an International Classification for Nursing Practice. Final proposal submitted to the Board of Directors. August 1991. Geneva, ICN.
7. International Council of Nurses (1993). Nursing's Next Advance: An International Classification for Nursing Practice: A Working Paper. Geneva, ICN.
8. International Council of Nurses (1996). The International Classification for Nursing Practice: A Unifying Framework: The Alpha Version. Geneva, ICN.
9. Johnson, M & Maas, M. (in press). Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes Classification (NOC). University of Iowa, Iowa City..
10. Lang, N (Ed.). (1996). Nursing Data Systems: The Emerging Framework. Washington DC: American Nurses Association.
11. Lang, N & Marek, KD (1990). The classification of patient outcomes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 6(3), 158-163.
12. Maas, ML, Johnson, M & Moorhead, S (1996) Classifying nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Image 28, 4, 295-301.
13. Marek, K (1989). Outcome measurement in nursing. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 4, 1-9.
14. Marek, K (1995). Classification of outcome measures of nursing. Paper commissioned by the International Council of Nurses for the development of the ICNR June 1995.
15. Marek, KS Lang, N (1993) Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes. In: papers from the Nursing Minimum Data Set Conference. Ottawa, Ontario, Canadian Nurses Association.
16. Martin, K & Sheets, N. (1992). The Omaha Classification System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
17. McCormick, K. (1991). Future data needs for quality of care monitoring, DRG considerations, reimbursement and outcome measurement. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(1), 29-32.
18. Nielsen, G H & Mortensen RA (1996= Personal communication.
19. Nightingale, F (1858). Notes on matters affecting the health, efficiency and hospital administration of the British Army. London: Harrison & Sons.
20. Saba, V K (1992). The classification of home health nursing: Diagnoses and interventions. Caring Magazine, 11(3), 50-57.
21. Van der Bruggen, H & Groen, M (1996). Towards a univocal definition and classification of patient outcomes: Interim report of a Delphi survey. University of Limburg, Maastricht. Unpublished.