Deflection and stress distribution in three different IMZ abutment designs

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 110-121

  Haganman, Chris R ^a   Holmes, David C ^b   Aquilino, Steven A ^c   Diaz Arnold, Ana M ^d   Stanford, Clark M ^d  

^a School of Prosthodontics ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Dental implants; Dental prosthesis retention; Stress analysis; Synthetic resins

Indexed keywords

GOLD ALLOY; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0031151117     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1997.tb00076.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Chapman RJ, Kirsch A: Variations in occlusal forces with a resilient internal implant shock absorber. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:369-374
2. Kirsch A, Mentag, PJ: The IMZ endosseous two-phase implant system: A complete oral rehabilitation treatment concept. J Oral Implantol 1986;12:576-589
3. Babbush CA, Kirsch A, Mentag PJ, et al: Intramobile cylinder (IMZ) two-stage osteointegrated implant system with the intramobile element (IME): Part I. Its rationale and procedure for use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:203-216
4. French AA, Bowles CQ, Parham PL, et al: Comparison of peri-implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent 1989;9:221-230
5. McGlumphy EA, Campagni WV, Peterson LJ: A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62: 586-593
6. Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, et al: Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile clement: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:450-458
7. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, et al: A comparative study between Brånemark and IMZ implants supporting overdentures: Prosthetic considerations, in W. R. Laney, E. D. Tolman (eds): Tissue Integration in Oral, Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1990, pp 179-193
8. Holmes DC: Influence of Resilient Intramobile Element on Distribution of Functional Forces in Endosseous Dental Implant: A Stress Analysis Utilizing the Finite Element Method. Iowa City: The University of Iowa [Masters Thesis], 1991, p 117
9. Holmes DC, Haganman CR, Aquilino SA, et al: Finite element stress analysis of IMZ abutment designs: Development of a model. J Prosthod 1997;6:31-36
10. Keller JC, Lautenschlager EP: Metals and alloys, in A. F. von Recum (ed): Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation. New York, Macmillan, 1986, pp 3-37
11. Billmeyer FW: Heterochain thermoplastics, in F. W. Billmeyer (ed): Textbook of Polymer Science (ed 2). New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1971, pp 443-467
12. Patterson EA, Johns RB: Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:26-29
13. Holmes DC, Haganman CR, Aquilino SA: Deflection of superstructure and stress concentrations in the IMZ implant system. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:239-246
14. McGlumphy EA, Robinson DM, Mendel DA: Implant superstructures: A comparison of ultimate failure force. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:35-39