Finite element stress analysis of IMZ abutment designs: Development of a model

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 31-36

  Holmes, David C ^a   Haganman, Chris R ^b   Aquilino, Steven A ^b   Diaz Arnold, Ana M ^b   Stanford, Clark M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Dental implants; Dental prosthesis retention; Stress analysis; Synthetic resins

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, STRUCTURAL;

EID: 0031082881     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1997.tb00062.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Clough RW: The finite clement method in plane stress analysis. Proceedings of the 2nd ASCE Conference on Electronic Computation. New York, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1960
2. Goel VK, Lee IK, Blair WF: Stress distribution in the ulna following a hinged elbow arthroplasty. A finite element analysis. J Arthroplasty 1989;4:163-171
3. Balar SD, Rogge TR, Young DF: Computer simulation of blood fiowin the human arm. J Biomech 1989;22:691-697
4. Farah JW, Hood JAA, Craig RG: Effects of cement bases on the stresses in amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1975;54: 10-15
5. Tanne K, Brustone CJ, Sakuda M: Biomechanical responses of tooth associated with different root lengths and alveolar bone heights: Changes of stress distributions in the PDL. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1989;29:17-24
6. Beaupré GS, Carter DR: Finite element analysis in biomechanics, in AA Biewener (ed): Biomechanics: Structures and Systems, A Practical Approach. Oxford, IRC Press at Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 149-174
7. Desalvo GJ, Gorman RW: ANSYS User's Manual, Rev. 4.4. Houston, PA, Swanson Analysis Systems Inc, 1989
8. Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, et al: Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:450-458
9. Tesk JA, Widera O: Stress distribution in bone arising from loading on endosteal dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1973;(symp 4):251-261
10. Buch JD, Crose JG, Bechtol CO: Biomechanical and biomaterial considerations of natural teeth, tooth replacements and skeletal fixation. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs 1974;1: 171-186
11. Privitzer E, Widera O, Tesk JA: Some factors affecting dental implant design. J Biomed Mater Res 1975;(symp 6):251-255
12. Brunski JB, Hipp JA, Shepard MS, et al: Modeling of the bone-implant interface in a study of interfacial bone adaptation/damage, in NA Langrada (ed): Advances in Bioengineering. New York, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1985, pp 43-44
13. Rieger MR: Finite element stress analysis of root-form implants. J Oral Implantol 1988;14:472-484
14. Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, et al: Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61: 223-228
15. Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL, et al: Finite element analysis of bone-adapted and bone-bonded endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:436-440
16. Siegele D, Soltész U: Numerical investigation of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333-340
17. Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL: Finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:457-465
18. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO: Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-676
19. Mihalko WM, May TC, Kay JF, et al: Finite element analysis of interface geometry effects on the crestal bone surrounding a dental implant. Implant Dent 1992;1:212-217
20. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, et al: Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthod 1993;2:183-189
21. Holmes DC, Haganman CR, Aquilino SA: Deflection of superstructure and stress concentrations in the IMZ implant system. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:239-246
22. Carter DR, Hayes WC: The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 1977;59:954-962
23. Kydd WL, Mandley J: The stiffness of palatal mucoperiosteum. J Prosthet Dent 1967;18:116-122
24. Craig RG, O'Brien WJ, Powers JM: Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation. St. Louis, MO, CV Mosby, 1987, pp 19-20
25. Brydon JA: Polyacetals and related materials, in Plastic Materials. Princeton, NJ, D. Van Nostrand Co, 1966, pp 316-335
26. Katz JL, Akers A, Chow R, et al: The elastic properties of implantable materials. J Dent Res 1989;69:963
27. Jörnéus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L: Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowis supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:353-359
28. Patterson EA, Johns RB: Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:26-34
29. Brunski JB: Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clinical Materials 1992;10:153-201