Panel report: The potential of geons for generic 3-D object recognition

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 277-292

  Dickinson, Sven J ^a   Bergevin, Robert ^g   Biederman, Irving ^b   Eklundh, Jan Olof ^c   Munck Fairwood, Roger ^d   Jain, Anil K ^e   Pentland, Alex ^f  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^e Michigan State University   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^g NONE

Author keywords

3 D object recognition; Geons; Object modelling

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; OBJECT RECOGNITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VISION;

GEONS; OBJECT MODELLING;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0031117453     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(96)01134-1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. I. Biederman, Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 32 (1985) 29-73.
2. I. Biederman and E. Cooper, Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23 (1991) 393-419.
3. I. Biederman and P. Gerhardstein, Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence for 3d viewpoint invariance. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19 (1993) 1162-1182.
4. R. Bergevin and M.D. Levine, Recognition of 3-D objects in 2-D line drawings: An approach based on geons. Technical Report TR-CIM-88. Center for Intelligent Machines, McGill University, November 1988.
5. R. Bergevin and M.D. Levine, Generic object recognition: building coarse 3D descriptions from line drawings. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Interpretation of 3D Scenes, pp. 68-74, Austin, TX, 1989.
6. M. Levine, R. Bergevin and Q.L. Nguyen, Shape description using geons as 3D primitives. Proc. International Workshop on Visual Form (IWVF). Capri, Italy, May 1991.
7. S. Dickinson, A. Pentland and A. Rosenfeld, A representation for qualitative 3-D object recognition integrating object-centered and viewer-centered models. Technical Report CAR-TR-453, Center for Automation Research, University of Maryland, 1989. (Also appears with the same title in: K.N. Leibovic (ed.), Vision: A Convergence of Disciplines. Springer-Verlag, NY, 1990. pp. 398-421.)
8. S. Dickinson, A. Pentland and A. Rosenfeld, A representation for qualitative 3-D object recognition integrating object-centered and viewer-centered models. Technical Report CAR-TR-453, Center for Automation Research, University of Maryland, 1989. (Also appears with the same title in: K.N. Leibovic (ed.), Vision: A Convergence of Disciplines. Springer-Verlag, NY, 1990. pp. 398-421.)
9. S. Dickinson, A. Pentland and A. Rosenfeld, 3-D shape recovery using distributed aspect matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2) (1992) 174-198.
10. S. Dickinson, A Pentland and A. Rosenfeld, From volumes to views: An approach to 3-D object recognition. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 55(2) (1992) 130-154.
11. A. Pentland, Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artificial Intelligence, 28 (1986) 293-331.
12. A. Pentland and S. Sclaroff, Closed-form solutions for physically based shape modeling and recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(7) (1991) 715-729.
13. S. Sclaroff and A. Pentland, Generalized implicit functions for computer graphics. ACM Computer Graphics, 25(2) (1991) 247-250.
14. R. Fairwood, Recognition of generic components using logic-program relations of image contours. Image and Vision Computing, 9(2) (April 1991) 113-122.
15. R. Fairwood and G. Barreau, A belief network for the recognition of 3-d geometric primitives. Proc. 6th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. Como, Italy, September 1991.
16. L. Du and R. Munck-Fairwood, Geon recognition through robust feature grouping. Proc. 9th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, Uppsala, Sweden, June 1995.
17. A. Jacot-Descombes and T. Pun. A probabilistic approach to 3-D inference of geons from a 2-D view. Proc. SPIE Applications of Artificial Intelligence X: Machine Vision and Robotics, pp. 579-588, Orlando, FL, 1992.
18. N. Raja and A. Jain, Recognizing geons from superquadrics fitted to range data. Image and Vision Computing, 10(3) (April 1992) 179-190.
19. S. Dickinson, D. Metaxas and A. Pentland, Constrained recovery of deformable models from range data. Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Visual Form, Capril, Italy, May 1994.
20. K. Wu and M. Levine, Recovering parametric geons from multiview range data. Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 159-166. Seattle, WA, June 1994.
21. J.-O. Eklundh, M. Li and G. Olofsson, Representations for 3-D geometric modeling. Technical Report IR.C.1.1., ESPRIT BRA-3038, Vision as Process, May 1990.
22. J.O. Eklundh and G. Olofsson, Geon-based recognition in an active vision system. In ESPRIT-BRA 3038, Vision as Process. Springer-Verlag ESPRIT Series, 1992.
23. J. Hummel, I. Biederman, P. Gerhardstein and H. Hilton, From edges to geons: A connectionist approach. Proc. Connectionist Summer School, pp. 462-471. Carnegie Mellon University, June 1988.
24. J. Hummel and I. Biederman, Dynamic binding in a neural net model for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99 (1992) 480-517.
25. S. Dickinson, I. Biederman, A. Pentland, J.-O. Eklundh, R. Bergevin and R. Munck-Fairwood, The use of geons for generic 3-D object recognition. Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1693-1699, Chambery, France, August 1993.
26. I. Biederman, Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94 (1987) 115-147.
27. I. Biederman and G. Ju, Surface vs. edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20 (1988) 38-64.
28. M. Zerroug and R. Nevatia, Volumetric descriptions from a single intensity image. International J. Computer Vision, 20 (1996) 11-42
29. R. Bergevin and M.D. Levine, Generic object recognition: Building and matching coarse 3d descriptions from line drawings. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15 (January 1993) 19-36.
30. J.-L. Arseneault, R. Bergevin and D. Laurendeau, Grouping of straight line segments and circular arcs for scene analysis. Proc. Vision Interface '94, pp. 137-144, Banff, Alberta, May 1994.
31. I. Biederman, Aspects and extensions of a theory of human image understanding. In: Z Pylyshyn (ed), Computational Processes in Human Vision, pp. 370-428. Ablex, New York, 1988.
32. I. Biederman, Visual object recognition. In: S. Kosslyn and D. Osherson (eds), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd Ed, pp. 121-165, MIT Press, 1995.
33. M. Kurbat, Structural description theories: Is rbc/jim a general purpose theory of human entry-level object recognition? Perception, 23 (1994) 1339-1368.
34. E. Leeuwenberg, P. van der Helm and R. van Lier, From geons to structure: A note on object representation. Perception, 23 (1994) 505-515.
35. I. Biederman and P. Gerhardstein, Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (1995) 1506-1514.
36. E. Cooper, S. Subramaniam and I. Biederman, Recognizing objects with an irregular part. Poster, Meetings of the Association for Vision and Opthalmology, Ft. Lauderldale, FL, 1995.
37. I. Biederman and E. Cooper, Viewpoint invariant differences during object recognition are more salient than metric differences, Submitted.
38. M. Lades, J. Vorbruggen, J. Buhmann, C. von der Malsburg, R. Wurtz and R. Konen, Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans. Computers, 42 (1993).
39. E. Cooper, I. Biederman and J. Hummel, Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian J. Psychology, 46 (1992) 191-214.
40. J. Hummel and B. Stankiewicz, An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description. In: T. Inui and J. McClelland (eds), Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication, pp. 93-121, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
41. I. Biederman, S. Subramaniam and S. Madigan, Chance forced choice recognition memory for identifiable rsvp object pictures. Meetings of the Psychonomics Society (presentation), St. Louis, MO, November 1994.
42. E. Kobatake and K. Tanaka, Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiology, 71 (1994) 856-867.
43. N. Raja and A. Jain, Obtaining generic parts from range images using a multi-view representation. CVGIP: Image Understanding. 60(1) (July 1994) 44-64.
44. S. Pankanti, A. Jain and G. Taubin, An evaluation of 3D object recognition system using algebraic surface primitives and superquadric primitives. Technical Report TR-CS-95-66, Michigan State University, January 1995.
45. S. Pankanti, C. Dorai and A. Jam, Robust feature detection for 3d object recognition. Proc. SPIE Conference on Geometric Methods In Computer Vision II (Vol. 2031), pp. 366-377, San Diego, CA, July 1993.
46. D. Hoffman and W. Richards, Parts of recognition, Cognition, 18 (1985) 65-96.
47. L. Du and R. Munck-Fairwood, A formal definition and framework for generic object recognition. Proc. 8th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis. University of Tromsø, Norway, May 1993.
48. T. Binford, Visual perception by computer. Proc. IEEE Conference on Systems and Control. Miami, FL, 1971.
49. S. Dickinson and D. Metaxas, Integrating qualitative and quantitative shape recovery. International J. Computer Vision, 13(3) (1994) 1-20.
50. S. Dickinson, H. Christensen, J. Tsotsos and G. Olofsson, Active object recognition integrating attention and viewpoint control. Proc. ECCV '94, Stockholm, Sweden, May 1994.
51. D. Wilkes, S. Dickinson and J. Tsotsos, A quantitative analysis of view degeneracy and its application to active focal length control. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, Cambridge, MA, June 1995.
52. E. Rivlin, S. Dickinson and A. Rosenfeld, Recognition by functional parts. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 62(2) (1995) 164-176.
53. S. Dickinson, D. Metaxas and A. Pentland, The role of model-based segmentation in the recovery of volumetric parts from range data. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (to appear).
54. S. Dickinson, H. Christensen, J. Tsotsos and G. Olofsson, Active object recognition integrating attention and viewpoint control. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU) (to appear).
55. S. Dickinson, P. Jasiobedzki, H. Christensen and G. Olofsson, Qualitative tracking of 3-D objects using active contour networks. Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle, WA, June 1994.
56. M. Chan, D. Metaxas and S. Dickinson, A new approach to tracking 3-D objects in 2-D image sequences. Proc. AAAI '94, Seattle, WA, August 1994.