Nursing faculty concerns regarding the adoption of computer technology

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 71-76

  Lewis, Deborah ^a   Watson, Joan E ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER LITERACY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, NURSING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FACULTY; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031088522     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Belfry M, Winne P. A review of the effectiveness of computer assisted instruction in nursing education. Comput Nurs. 1988;6:77-88.
2. Denk J, Martin J, Sarangarm S. Not yet comfortable in the classroom: A study of academic computing at three land-grant universities. J Educ Tech Sys. 1993;22:39-55.
3. Edwardson S, Pejsa J. A computer assisted tutorial for applications of computer spreadsheets in nursing financial management. Comput Nurs. 1993;11:169-175.
4. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Teachers and technology: Making the connections. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1995. OTA-EHR-616.
5. Negron J. The impact of computer anxiety and computer resistance on the use of computer technology by nurses. J Nurs Staff Dev. 1995;11:172-175.
6. Sweeney MA, Mercer Z, Lester J, Operman C. Multimedia interventions in maternal-infant community-base clinics. In: Nursing informatics: An international overview for nursing in a technological era. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1990.
7. Hannafin R, Savenye W. Technology in the classroom: The teacher's new role and resistance to it. Educational Technology. 1993;33:26-30.
8. Whiteside C, James RK. Utilizing teachers' concerns to improve microcomputer implementation. Computers in the Schools. 1986;2:29-41.
9. Cicchelli T, Baecher R. Microcomputers in the classroom: Focusing on teacher concerns. Comput Educ. 1989;13:37-46.
10. Wedman JF, Heller MO, Strathe MI. Changes in teachers' concerns about educational computing. Computers in the Schools. 1986;3:63-71.
11. Dupagne M, Krendi K. Teachers' attitudes toward computers: A review of the literature. J Res Comput Educ. 1992;24:420-429.
12. Hammond D. Blocks to the effective use of information technology in higher education. Comput Educ. 1992;18:155-162.
13. Handler M. Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Comput Educ. 1993;20:47-56.
14. Haffer A. Facilitating change: Choosing the appropriate strategy. J Nurs Adm. 1986;16:18-22.
15. Podemski RS. Computer technology and teacher education. J Teac Ed. 1981;32:29-32.
16. Huberty C, Klein G. On evaluating the impact of an innovative educational process. J Res Dev Educ. 1996;29:89-93.
17. Hall G, George A, Rutherford W. Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SOC Questionnaire. Austin, TX: University of Texas, The Research and Development Center for Teacher Education; 1977. Report no. TM006-654.
18. Barg F, Robinson K, McCorkle R, et al. Gaps and contract: Evaluating the diffusion of new information. Cancer Nurs. 1992;15:406-414.
19. Chang B. Adoption of innovations: Nursing and computer use. Nurs Comput. 1986;2:119-235.
20. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education. Stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin; 1974.
21. Hall G. The concerns based approach to facilitating change. Educ Horizons. 1979;57:202-208.
22. Hall G, Hord S. Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York, NY: State University of New York Press; 1987.