Predicting poor neonatal outcome: A comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 168, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 827-831

  Dubinsky, Theodore ^a   Lau, Manhut ^b   Powell, Frank ^a   Garcia, Jose ^b   Mastobattista, Joan ^b   Parvey, H Richard ^a   Sickler, Kim ^a   Maklad, Nabil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS OUTCOME; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PREDICTION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

EID: 0031047055     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057543     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Trudinger JB, Cook CM, Giles WB, Connelly A, Thompson RS. Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in high risk pregnancy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1987;1:188-190
2. Giles W, Bisits A. Clinical use of Doppler in pregnancy: information from six randomized trials. Fetal Diagn Ther 1993;8:247-255
3. Low JA. The current status of maternal and fetal blood flow velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1049-1063
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Utility of antepartum Doppler for estimating fetal umbilical and uterine artery flow (committee opinion no. 116). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1992
5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum fetal surveillance (technical bulletin no. 188). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1994
6. Dornan JC, Harper H. Where are we with Doppler? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:190-191
7. Bracero LA, Figureroa R, Byrne DW, Han HJ. Comparison of umbilical Doppler velocimetry, nonstress testing, and biophysical profile in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:301-308
8. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1984;150:535-540
9. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In-utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 1991;181:129-133
10. Jeanty P, Cantraine F, Romero R. et al. A longitudinal study of fetal weight growth. J Ultrasound Med 1984;3:321-328
11. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile score. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136:787-795
12. Divon MY. Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics. In: Cherry SH, Markatz IR, eds. Complications of pregnancy: medical, surgical and gynecological complications of pregnancy, 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1991:1086-1103
13. Marsal K, Gudmundson S, Stale H. Doppler velocimetry in monitoring fetal health during late pregnancy. In: Durjak A, Chervenak F, eds. The fetus as a patient. New York: Parthenon, 1994:455-475
14. Campbell S, Pearce JM, Hackett G, et al. Qualitative assessment of uteroplacental blood flow: early screening test for high-risk pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:649-653
15. Bracero L, Beneck D, Kirshenbaum N, et al. Doppler velocitometry and placental disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:388-393
16. Berkowitz GS, Mehalek KE, Chitkara U, et al. Doppler umbilical velocimetry in the prediction of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:742-746
17. Rochelson BL, Schulman H, Fleischer A, et al. The clinical significance of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in the small for gestational age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1223-1226
18. Divon MY, Guidetti DA, Braverman JJ, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: a prospective study of the diagnostic value of real-time sonography combined with umbilical artery flow velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:611-614
19. Hanretty KP, Primrose MH, Neilson JP, et al. Pregnancy screening by Doppler uteroplacental and umbilical artery waveforms. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1163-1166
20. Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, et al. Umbilical artery velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:502-505
21. Rochelson B, Schulman H, Farmakides G, et al. The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1213-1218
22. Hacket GA, Campbell S, Gamsu H, Cohen-Over-beck T. Pcarce JMF. Doppler studies in the growth retarded fetus and prediction of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, hemorrhage and neonatal morbidity. BMJ 1987;294:13-16
23. Bilardo CM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:115-120
24. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Giles WB, et al. Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:378-384
25. Divon MY, Girz BA, Lieblick R, Langer O. Clinical management of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1523-1527
26. Todros T, Ferrazzi E, Arduini D, et al. Performance of Doppler ultrasonography as a screening test in low risk pregnancies: results of a multicentric study. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:343-348
27. Mason GC, Lilford RJ, Porter J, Nelson E, Tyrell S. Randomized comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:130-133
28. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Lopresti S, Schneider E. Surveillance of growth retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries. J Reprod Med 1996;41:112-118
29. Newnham JP, O'Dea MRA, Reid KP, Diepeveen DA. Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in high risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:956-963
30. Omtzigt AMWJ, Reuwer PJHM, Bruinse HW. A randomized controlled trial on the clinical value of umbilical Doppler velocimetry in antenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:403-410
31. Whittle MJ, Hanretty KP, Primrose MH, Neilson JP. Screening for the compromised fetus: a randomized trial of umbilical artery velocimetry in unselected pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:555-559
32. Bell JG, Ludomirsky A, Bottalico J, Weiner S. The effect of improvement of umbilical artery absent end-diastolic velocity on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1015-1020
33. Lewis DF, Futayyeh S, Towers CV, et al. Preterm delivery from 34 to 37 weeks of gestation: is respiratory distress syndrome a problem? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:525-528