The perception of motion and structure in structure-from-motion: Comparisons of affine and Euclidean formulations

Vision Research

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 447-466

  Pollick, Frank E ^a  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Depth; KDE; Motion; Structure from motion

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; VELOCITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031046199     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00188-5     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ando, H. (1991). Dynamic reconstruction of 3D structure and 3D motion. Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on visual motion (pp. 101-110). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
2. Bennett B., Hoffman D., Nicola J., Prakash C. Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 6:1989;1052-1069.
3. Bennett B., Hoffman D., Prakash C. Recognition polynomials. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10:1993;759-764.
4. Beusmans J.M.H. Computing the direction of heading from affine image flow. Biological Cybernetics. 70:1993;123-136.
5. Börjesson E., Ahlström U. Motion structure in five-dot patterns as a determinant of perceptual grouping. Perception and Psychophysics. 53:1993;2-12.
6. Börjesson E., von Hofsten C. Spatial determinants of depth perception in two-dot motion patterns. Perception and Psychophysics. 11:1972;263-268.
7. Börjesson E., von Hofsten C. Visual perception of motion in depth: application of a vector model to three-dot motion patterns. Perception and Psychophysics. 13:1973;169-179.
8. Börjesson E., von Hofsten C. A vector model for perceived object rotation and translation in space. Psychological Research. 38:1975;209-230.
9. Braunstein M.L. Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: effects of numerosity and perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 64:1962;415-520.
10. Braunstein M.L., Hoffman D.D., Pollick F.E. Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: minimum points and views. Perception and Psychophysics. 47:1990;205-214.
11. Braunstein M.L., Hoffman D.D., Shapiro L.R., Andersen G.J., Bennett B.M. Minimum points and views for the recovery of three-dimensional structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13:1987;335-343.
12. Braunstein M.L., Todd J.T. On the distinction between artifacts and information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;211-216.
13. Caudek C., Proffitt D.R. Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;32-47.
14. Cortese J.M., Andersen G.J. Recovery of 3-D shape from deforming contours. Perception and Psychophysics. 49:1991;315-327.
15. Domini, F., Caudek, C. & Proffitt, D.R. (1997). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the Kinetic Depth Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press.
16. Doner J., Lappin J.S., Perfetto G. Detection of three-dimensional structure in moving optical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 10:1984;1-11.
17. Dosher B.A., Landy M.S., Sperling G. Ratings of kinetic depth in multidot displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;816-825.
18. Durgin F.H., Proffitt D.R., Olson T.J., Reinke K.S. Comparing depth from binocular disparity to depth from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;149-169.
19. Eagle R.A., Blake A. Two-dimensional constraints on three-dimensional structure from motion tasks. Vision Research. 35:1995;2927-2941.
20. Eagleson R. Measurement of the 2D affine Lie group parameters for visual motion analysis. Spatial Vision. 6:1992;183-198.
21. Eagleson R., Burkell J., Pylyshyn Z. Exogenous attention facilitates discrimination of affine motion components. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 344:1993;1033.
22. Eby D.W. The spatial and temporal characteristics of perceiving 3-D structure from motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 51:1992;163-178.
23. Faugeras, O. (1993). Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Faugeras O. Stratification of three-dimensional vision: projective, affine, and metric representations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 12:1995;465-484.
25. Giblin, P.J., Rycroft, J.E. & Pollick, F.E. (1994). Moving surfaces. In R. Fisher (Ed.), Design and applications of curves and surfaces: mathematics of surfaces V (pp. 433-453) (Institute of Mathematics and its Applications Conference Proceedings Series). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Giblin P.J., Pollick F.E., Rycroft J.E. Recovery of surfaces from profiles under circular motion with unknown axis. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11:1994;1976-1984.
27. Green B.F. Jr. Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 62:1961;272-282.
28. Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
29. Grzywacz N.M., Hildreth E.C. The incremental rigidity scheme for recovering structure from motion: Position vs. velocity based formulations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 4:1987;503-518.
30. Hildreth E.C., Ando H., Andersen R.A., Treue S. Recovering three-dimensional structure from motion with surface reconstruction. Vision Research. 35:1995;117-137.
31. Hildreth E.C., Grzywacz N.M., Adelson E.H., Inada V.K. The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 48:1990;19-36.
32. Hoffman D., Bennett B. The computation of structure from fixed-axis motion: Rigid structures. Biological Cybernetics. 54:1986;71-83.
33. von Hofsten C. Proximal velocity change as a determinant of space perception. Perception and Psychophysics. 15:1974;488-494.
34. Hogervorst M.A., Kappers A.M.L., Koenderink J.A. A tolerance analysis for structure-from-motion stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;449-459.
35. Huang T., Lee C. Motion and structure from orthographic projections. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 11:1989;536-540.
36. Husain M., Treue S., Andersen R.A. Surface interpolation in three-dimensional structure-from-motion perception. Neural Computation. 1:1989;324-333.
37. Indow T. A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. Psychological Review. 98:1991;430-453.
38. Iverson, G.J. (1986). Testing whether or not two points belong to a common ROC. Unpublished manuscript.
39. Koenderink J.J., Van Doorn A.J. Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 75:1991;377-385.
40. Kontsevich L.L. Pairwise comparison technique: a simple solution for depth reconstruction. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10:1993;1129-1135.
41. Lacquaniti F., Terzuolo C., Viviani P. The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica. 54:1983;115-130.
42. Lappin J.S., Ahlström U.B. On the scaling of visual space from motion - in response to Pizlo and Salach-Golyska. Perception and Psychophysics. 55:1994;235-242.
43. Lappin J.S., Love S.R. Planar motion permits perception of metric structure in stereopsis. Perception and Psychophysics. 51:1992;86-102.
44. Lawn, J. & Cipolla, R. (1993). Epipole estimation using affine motion parallax. British Machine Vision Conference, 1993. Guildford, U.K.: BMVA Press.
45. Liter J.C., Braunstein M.L. Judged rotation magnitude in structure-from-motion with and without frontal views. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 354:1994;1742.
46. Liter J.C., Braunstein M.L., Hoffman D.D. Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multi-view displays. Perception. 22:1994;1441-1465.
47. Luneburg R.K. The metric of binocular visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 50:1950;637-642.
48. Macmillan N.A., Kaplan H.L. Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychological Bulletin. 98:1985;185-199.
49. Marascuilo L.A. Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika. 35:1970;237-243.
50. Massey J.T., Lurito J.T., Pellizzer G., Georgopoulos A.P. Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics. Experimental Brain Research. 88:1992;685-690.
51. Maybank, S. (1993). Theory of reconstruction from image motion. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
52. Mundy, J.L. & Zisserman, A. (1992). Appendix - Projective geometry for machine vision. In Mundy, J.L. & Zisserman, A. (Eds), Geometric invariance in computer vision. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53. Norman J.F., Todd J.T. The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception and Psychophysics. 53:1993;279-291.
54. Oliensis, J. & Thomas, J.I. (1991). Incorporating motion error in multi-frame structure from motion. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion (pp. 8-13). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
55. Pizlo Z., Salach-Golyska M. Is vision metric? Comment on. Perception and Psychophysics. 55:1994;230-234.
56. Pollick F.E. Perceiving shape from profiles. Perception and Psychophysics. 55:1994;152-161.
57. Pollick F.E., Nishida S., Koike Y., Kawato M. Perceived motion in structure-from-motion: pointing responses to the axis of rotation. Perception and Psychophysics. 56:1994;91-109.
58. Pollick F.E., Sapiro G. Constant affine velocity predicts the. 1 3 power law of planar motion perception and generation Vision Research. 37:1997;347-353.
59. Proffitt D.R., Rock I., Hecht H., Schubert J. Stereokinetic effect and its relation to the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;3-21.
60. Pugh, A. (1976). Polyhedra: A visual approach. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
61. Pylyshyn Z. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition. 32:1989;65-97.
62. Sato T. Reversed apparent motion with random dot patterns. Vision Research. 29:1989;1749-1758.
63. Sedgwick, H.A. (1986). Space perception. In Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J.P. (Eds), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
64. Shapiro L.S., Zisserman A., Brady J.M. 3D motion recovery via affine epipolar geometry. International Journal of Computer Vision. 16:1995;147-180.
65. Sperling G., Dosher B.A., Landy M.S. How to study the kinetic depth effect experimentally. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;445-450.
66. Sperling G., Landy M.S., Dosher B.A., Perkins M.E. Kinetic depth effect and identification of shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;826-840.
67. Todd J.T., Akerstrom R.A., Reichel F.D., Hayes W. Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors. Perception and Psychophysics. 43:1988;179-188.
68. Todd J.T., Bressan P. The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception and Psychophysics. 48:1990;419-430.
69. Todd J.T., Norman J.F. The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception and Psychophysics. 50:1991;509-523.
70. Tomasi, C. & Kanade, T. (1991). Factoring image sequences into shape and motion. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion (pp. 21-28). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
71. Treue S., Andersen R.A., Ando H., Hildreth E.C. Structure from motion: perceptual evidence for surface interpolation. Vision Research. 35:1995;139-148.
72. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Ullman S. Maximizing rigidity: the incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and nonrigid motion. Perception. 13:1984;255-274.
74. van Veen H.A.H.C., Kappers A.M.L., Koenderink J.J., Werkhoven P. Discriminating the volume of motion-defined solids. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;561-570.
75. Viviani P., Stucchi N. The effect of movement velocity on form perception: geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception and Psychophysics. 46:1989;266-274.
76. Viviani P., Stucchi N. Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;603-623.
77. Viviani P., Terzuolo C. Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience. 7:1982;431-437.
78. Weinshall D. Model-based invariants for 3-D vision. International Journal of Computer Vision. 10:1993;27-42.
79. Werkhoven P., van Veen H.A.H.C. Extraction of relief from visual motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 57:1995;645-656.