The structure of microtubule-motor complexes

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 4-11

  Amos, Linda A ^a   Hirose, Keiko ^b  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; DIMER; KINESIN; MYOSIN; NOD PROTEIN; PROTEIN; TUBULIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTIN MYOSIN INTERACTION; CELL MOTION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; STOICHIOMETRY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 0031042321     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80145-7     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. 1. Howard J: The movement of kinesin along microtubules. Annu Rev Physiol 1996, 58:703-729.
2. 2. Hackney DD: The kinetic cycles of myosin, kinesin, and dynein. Annu Rev Physiol 1996, 58:731-750.
3. 3. Goldstein LSB, White D, Hackney D, Howard J, Cooke R, Block S, Lowey S: Structural features involved in force generation in the kinesin superfamily. Biophys J 1995, 68(suppl 4S):260S-266S.
4. 4. Cole DG, Scholey JM: Structural variations among the kinesins. Trends Cell Biol 1994, 5:259-262.
5. 5. Spudich JA: How molecular motors work. Nature 1994, 372:89-93.
6. 6. Kull FJ, Sablin EP, Lau R, Fletterick RJ, Vale RD: Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin. Nature 1996, 380:550-555. The atomic structure of the human kinesin motor domain is revealed as an arrowhead-shaped domain with a number of loops on its surface. The cluster of a helices and β strands forming the main domain turns out to be much more similar to the core of the myosin motor domain than was expected.
7. •]. The core structures are virtually indistinguishable and the locations of conserved surface amino acids suggest that the motors share a common microtubule-binding site. This finding indicates that the directionality of the two motors must be a fairly subtle kinetic feature.
8. 8. Goody RS: Motor proteins - a 2-way structure. Nature 1996, 380:483-484.
9. 9. Hackney DD: Myosin and kinesin: mother and child reunited. Chem Biol 1996, 3:525-528.
10. 10. Rayment I: Kinesin and myosin: molecular motors with similar engines. Structure 1996, 4:501-504.
11. 11. Sakowicz R, Goldstein LSB: The muscle in kinesin. Nat Struct Biol 1996, 3:404-407.
12. 12. Sellers JR: Kinesin and ncd, two structural cousins of myosin. J Musc Res Cell Motil 1996, 17:173-175.
13. 13. Nogales E, Wolf SG, Khan IA, Luduena RF, Downing KH: Structure of tubulin at 6.5 Å and location of the taxol-binding site. Nature 1995, 375:424-427.
14. 14. Ray S, Wolf SG, Howard J, Downing KH: Kinesin does not support the motility of zinc-macrotubes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1995, 30:146-152.
15. 15. Song Y-H, Mandelkow E: Recombinant kinesin motor domain binds to β-tubulin and decorates microtubules with a B surface lattice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:1671-1675.
16. 16. Huang TG, Hackney DD: Drosophila kinesin minimal motor domain expressed in Escherichia coli-purification and kinetic characterization. J Biol Chem 1994, 269:16493-16501.
17. 17. Harrison BC, Marchese-Ragona SP, Gilbert SP, Cheng N, Steven AC, Johnson KA: Decoration of the microtubule surface by one kinesin head per tubulin heterodimer. Nature 1993, 362:73-75.
18. 18. Song Y-H, Mandelkow E: The anatomy of flagellar microtubules: polarity, seam, junctions, and lattice. J Cell Biol 1995, 128:81-94.
19. 19. Hirose K, Fan J, Amos LA: Re-examination of the polarity of microtubules and sheets decorated with kinesin motor domain. J Mol Biol 1995, 251:329-333. This paper disagrees with [18] over the polarity of the staining pattern seen in electron micrographs of tubulin sheets grown from the ends of flagellar axonemes and decorated with kinesin heads in the presence of AMP-PNR The plus and minus ends of axonemes were distinguished by studying examples either with brain tubulin extensions of clearly different lengths assembled from both ends, or with extensions assembled only from the plus end using a mixture of NEM-treated tubulin and untreated tubulin. To understand microtubule-associated motility, it is important to know the correct structural polarity of microtubule-motor complexes.
20. ••], provided the initial 3-D images of kinesin and ncd motor domains interacting with tubulin. From a comparison of 3-D images of negatively stained, flattened, opened-out microtubules, either undecorated or complexed with monomeric ncd motor domain, Hoenger et al. reported a fairly large apparent change in tubulin conformation due to ncd binding; this might indicate a very active role for tubulin in motor movement.
21. 21. Kikkawa M, Ishikawa T, Wakabayashi T, Hirokawa N: 3-dimensional structure of the kinesin head-microtubule complex. Nature 1995, 376:274-277. This paper reports 3-D images of frozen hydrated 10-protofilament reassembled brain microtubules, with and without decoration by the monomeric kinesin motor domain.
22. •], it was shown that kinesin, in the strongly microtubule-binding empty and AMP-PNP-occupied states and the more weakly binding ADP-filled state, as well as ncd in the AMP-PNP-occupied state, all bind in the same orientation to essentially the same site on the tubulin dimer. A change in tilt angle of part of the kinesin motor domain, between the ADP-containing and nucleotide-free states, as seen in the 3-D images, would therefore produce movement towards the plus end.
23. 23. Hackney DD: Motor proteins - polar explorations. Nature 1995, 376:215-216
24. 24. Egelman EH: Motile systems: tubulin-based motility races ahead. Curr Biol 1995, 5:1354-1356.
25. 25. Bergen LG, Borisy GG: Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. Electron microscopic analysis of seeded assembly. J Cell Biol 1980, 84:141-150.
26. 26.Mitchison T, Kirschner M: Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 1984, 312:237-242.
27. 27. Crevel IM-T, Lockhart A, Cross RA: Weak and strong states of kinesin and ncd. J Mol Biol 1996, 257:66-76.
28. •] also establishes the polarity of undecorated tubulin sheets.
29. 29. Chrétien D, Kenney JM, Fuller SD, Wade RH: Determination of microtubule polarity by cryo-electron microscopy. Structure 1996, 4:1031-1040.
30. •]); the microtubule surfaces appeared unchanged, except for the addition of motor molecules on the outside, but small internal differences were detectable.
31. ••], allowing the relative alignment of the two decorated maps plus an undecorated map to be reliably confirmed. The two types of attached heads clearly bind to equivalent sites on tubulin but some subtle structural differences may be related to their opposite directions of movement.
32. •].
33. 33. Lanzavecchia S, Bellon PL, Dallai R, Afzelius BA: Three dimensional reconstructions of accessory tubules observed in the sperm axonemes of two insect species. J Struct Biol 1994, 113:225-237.
34. 34. Ray S, Meyhöfer E, Milligan RA, Howard J: Kinesin follows the microtubule's protofilament axis. J Cell Biol 1993, 121:1083-1093.
35. 35. Wade RH, Horowitz R, Milligan RA: Toward understanding the structure and interactions of microtubules and motor proteins. Proteins - Struct Fund Genet 1995, 23:502-509.
36. 36. Kikkawa, M, Ishikawa T, Nakata T, Wakabayashi T, Hirokawa N: Direct visualization of the microtubule lattice seam both invitro and in-vivo. J Cell Biol 1995, 127:1965-1971.
37. 37. Sosa H, Milligan RA: Three-dimensional structure of ncd-decorated microtubules obtained by a back-projection method. J Mol Biol 1996, 260:743-755. Cryo-electron microscopy and a back-projection method of image analysis [35] are used to obtain the 3-D structures of 11-, 12-, 14- and 15-protofilament microtubules decorated with ncd motor domains. The method can calculate 3-D maps even for structures whose helical symmetry is broken by lattice discontinuities (seams) and reveals the presence or absence of seams. The result is particularly useful for future work, in that it shows that helically symmetrical brain microtubules can be identified.
38. 38. Lockhart A, Crevel IM-TC, Cross RA: Kinesin and ncd bind through a single head to microtubules and compete for a shared MT binding site. J Mol Biol 1995, 249:763-771.
39. ••].
40. 40. Peskin CS, Oster G: Coordinated hydrolysis explains the mechanical behavior of kinesin. Biophys J 1995, 68(suppl4S):202S-211S.
41. 41. Reedy MK, Holmes KC, Tregear RT: Induced changes in orientation of the cross-bridges of glycerinated insect flight muscle. Nature 1965, 207:1276-1280.
42. ••] seem to provide further evidence of the homology between the motile mechanisms of myosin and kinesin.
43. •].
44. 44. Mitchison TJ: Localization of an exchangeable GTP-binding site at the plus end of microtubules. Science 1993, 261:1044-1047.
45. 45. Fan J, Griffiths AD, Lockhart A, Cross RA, Amos LA: Microtubule minus ends can be labelled with a phage display antibody specific to alpha-tubulin. J Mol Biol 1996, 259:325-330. This paper reported an artificial antibody to an epitope near the amino-terminus of α-tubulin. 30 nm diameter gold beads coated with the antibody were shown to bind to one end of microtubules, being visualized by electron microscopy and by light microscopy in sliding motility assays. The result confirmed that of Mitchison [44]. Both results are useful in helping to identify β-tubulin as the monomer that binds to the broader top part of a motor domain.
46. 46. Walker RA: Ncd and kinesin motor domains interact with both alpha-tubulin and beta-tubulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:5960-5964.
47. 47. Larcher JC, Boucher D, Lazareg S, Gros F, Denoulet P: Interaction of kinesin motor domains with alpha- and betatubulin subunits at a tau-independent binding site: regulation by polyglutamylation. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:22117-22124.
48. 48. Wolf SG, Nogales E, Kikkawa M, Gratzinger D, Hirokawa N, Downing KH: Interpreting a medium resolution model of tubulin: comparison of zinc-sheet and microtubule structure. J Mol Biol 1996, 262:485-501. In this paper, the position of a peak in a difference map comparing two-dimensional crystals of unmodified zinc-tubulin [13] and subtilisin-digested tubulin, which lacks part of the carboxy-terminal segment, supports the identification in [13] of the predicted carboxy-terminal α helix. The plus-minus orientation of zinc-tubulin protofilaments is found by comparison of the projected density with that of protofilaments in normal tubulin sheets growing from Chlamydomonas axonemes. Building on this, the assumption that the intersubunit connection with the highest density in projection represents the heterodimer bond leads the authors to conclude tentatively that the subunit towards the plus end is α-tubulin.
49. 49. Erickson HP, Stoffler D: Protofilaments and rings: two conformations of the tubulin family conserved from bacterial FtsZ to α/β and γ tubulin. J Cell Biol 1996, 135:5-8.
50. 50. Moritz M, Braunfeld MB, Sedat JW, Alberts B, Agard DA: Microtubule nucleation by gamma-tubulin-containing rings in the centrosome. Nature 1995, 378:638-640.
51. 51. Zheng YX, Wong MI, Alberts B, Mitchison T: Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a gamma-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 1995, 378:578-583.
52. 52. Oakley B: γ-tubulin: the microtubule organizer. Trends Cell Biol 1992, 2:1-5.