Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 66-74

  Bell, Malcolm R ^a   Britson, Paula J ^a   Chu, Aloysius ^a   Holmes Jr , David R ^a   Bresnahan, John F ^a   Schwartz, Robert S ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

algorithm; calibration; computer assisted; coronary angiography; coronary disease; image processing

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CINEANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL COMPUTER; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOM; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0031029661     PISSN: 00986569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199701)40:1<66::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO;2-S     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Serruys PW, Herrman JP, Simon R, Rutsch W, Bode C, Laarman GJ, van Dijk R, van den Bos AA, Umans VA, Fox KA, et al.: A comparison of hirudin with heparin in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Helvetica Investigators. N Engl J Med 333:757-63, 1995.
2. MERCATOR Study Group: Does the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty? Results of the MERCATOR study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to Prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis. Circulation 86:100-10, 1992.
3. Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, Whitlow PL, Hofling B, Simonton CA, Masden RR, Serruys PW, Leon MB, Williams DO, et al.: A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group. N Engl J Med 329:221-7, 1993.
4. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, et al.: A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study. N Engl J Med 331:496-501, 1994.
5. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al.: A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 331:489-95, 1994.
6. Waters D, Lesperance J, Craven TE, Hudon G, Gillam LD: Advantages and limitations of serial coronary arteriography for the assessment of progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Implications for clinical trials. Circulation 87(suppl II): II38-47, 1993.
7. Reiber JH, van der Zwet PMJ, Koning G, von Land CG, van Meurs B, Gerbrands JJ, Buis B, van Voorthuisen AE: Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: Observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 28:187-98, 1993.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. Lancet 1:307-10, 1986.
9. Di Mario C, Hermans WR, Rensing BJ, Serruys PW: Calibration using angiographic catheters as scaling devices-importance of filming the catheters not filled with contrast medium. Am J Cardiol 69:1377-8, 1992.
10. Herman J, Keane D, den Boer A, Serruys PW: Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: A quantitative analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 33:55-60, 1994.
11. Herrington DM, Siebes M, Sokol DK, Siu CO, Walford GD: Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1068-74, 1993.
12. Hausleiter J, Nolte CWT, Jost S, Wiese B, Sturm M, Lichtlen PR: Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 37:14-22, 1996.
13. Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, van Swijndregt EM, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, di Mario C, Kirkeeide R, Serruys PW: Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation 91:2174-83, 1995.