Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 14-22

  Hausleiter, Jörg ^a,b   Nolte, Carsten W T ^a   Jost, Stefan ^a   Wiese, Birgitt ^a   Sturm, Matthias ^a   Lichtlen, Paul R ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary diameter; Coronary phantoms; Edge detection; Quantitative coronary arteriography

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030067193     PISSN: 00986569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199601)37:1<14::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO;2-7     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW: Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 53: 627-632, 1976.
2. Sanmarco ME, Brooks SH, Blankenhorn DH: Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms. Am Heart J 96:430-437, 1978.
3. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W: Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 55:324-328, 1977.
4. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT: Quantitative coronary arteriography: Estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation 55:329-337, 1977.
5. Kirkeeide RL, Fung P, Smalling RW, Gould KL: Automated evaluation of vessel diameter from arteriograms. Comput Cardiol 215-218, 1982.
6. Spears JR, Sandor T, Als AV, Malagold M, Markis JE, Grossman W, Serur JR, Paulin S: Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms. Circulation 68:453-461, 1983.
7. Reiber JH, Gerbrands JJ, Booman F, Troost GJ, den Boer A, Slager CJ, Schuurbiers JC: Objective characterization of coronary obstructions from monoplane cineangiograms and three-dimensional reconstruction of an arterial segment from two orthogonal views. In Schwartz MD (ed): "Application of Computers in Medicine." IEEE Cat. No. TH0095-0:93-100, 1982.
8. Lichtlen PR, Hugenholtz PG, Rafflenbeul W, Hecker H, Jost S, Deckers JW: Retardation of angiographic progression of coronary artery disease by nifedipine. Results of the International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy (INTACT). INTACT Group Investigators. Lancet 335:1109-1113, 1990.
9. Beatt KJ, Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Rensing BJ, Suryapranata H, de FP, van dBM, Laarman GJ, Roelandt J: Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: The paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:258-266, 1992.
10. Kalbfleisch SJ, McGillem MJ, Simon SB, DeBoe SF, Pinto IM, Mancini GB: Automated quantitation of indexes of coronary lesion complexity. Comparison between patients with stable and unstable angina. Circulation 82:439-447, 1990.
11. Jost S, Rafflenbeul W, Reil GH, Trappe HJ, Gulba D, Hecker H, Gerhardt U, Knop I: Elimination of variable vasomotor tone in studies with repeated quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Card Imaging 5:125-134, 1990.
12. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LSC, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB: AHA Committee Report: A Reporting System on Patients Evaluated for Coronary Artery Disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5-40, 1975.
13. Reiber JH, Kooijman CJ, den Boer A, Serruys PW: Assessment of dimensions and image quality of coronary contrast catheters from cineangiograms. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 11:521-531, 1985.
14. Fortin DF, Spero LA, Cusma JT, Santoro L, Burgess R, Bashore TM: Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography. Am J Cardiol 68:1176-1182, 1991.
15. LeFree MT, Simon SB, Mancini GB, Bates ER, Vogel RA: A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: Implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification. Invest Radiol 23:176-183, 1988.
16. LeFree MT, Simon SB, Lewis RJ, Bates ER, Vogel RA: Digital radiographic coronary artery quantification. Comput Cardiol 99-102, 1985.
17. Mancini GB, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, LeFree MT, Friedman HZ, Vogel RA: Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: Morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation 75:452-460, 1987.
18. Vogel RA, LeFree MT, Mancini GB: Comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image imaging for quantitative coronary arteriography. In Heintzen PH, Bürsch JH (eds): "Progress in Digital Angiocardiography." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 159-171, 1988.
19. Reiber JH, Kooijman CJ, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Wijns W, Serruys PW, Hugenholtz PG: Coronary artery dimensions from cineangiograms-methodology and validation of a computer-assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Trans Med Imag MI-3:131-141, 1984.
20. Reiber JH, Kooijman CJ, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Wijns W, Serruys PW: Computer assisted analysis of the severity of obstructions from coronary cineangiograms: A methodological review. Automedica 5:219-238, 1984.
21. Reiber JH, van der Zwet PM, von Land CD, Koning G, van Meurs B, Buis B, van Voorthuisen AE. Quantitative coronary arteriography: Equipment and technical requirements. In Reiber JH, Serruys PW (eds): "Advances in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 75-111, 1993.
22. Zijlstra F, de Boer NJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JH, Suryapranata H: A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 328:680-684, 1993.
23. van der Zwet P, Pinto IM, Serruys PW, Reiber JH: A new approach for the automated definition of path lines in digitized coronary angiograms. Int J Card Imaging 5:75-83, 1990.
24. Reiber JHC: An overview of coronary quantitation techniques as of 1989. In Reiber JHC, Serruys PW (eds): "Quantitative Coronary Arteriography." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, pp 55-132.
25. Scheffé H: "The Analysis of Variance." New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1959.
26. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, Wijns W, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Hugenholtz PG: Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71:280-288, 1985.
27. Haase J, Di Mario C, Slager CJ, van der Giessen WJ, den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Reiber JHC, Verdouw PD, Serruys PW: In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 27:16-27, 1992.
28. Tobis J, Nalcioglu O, Iseri L, Johnston WD, Roeck W, Castleman E, Bauer B, Montelli S, Henry WL: Detection and quantitation of coronary artery stenoses from digital subtraction angiograms compared with 35-millimeter film cineangiograms. Am J Cardiol 54:489-496, 1984.
29. Vas R, Eigler N, Miyazono C, Pfaff JM, Resser KJ, Weiss M, Nivatpumin T, Whiting J, Forrester J: Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol 56:718-723, 1985.
30. Gurley JC, Nissen SE: Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography. Int J Card Imaging 5:105-118, 1990.
31. Skelton TN, Kisslo KB, Bashore TM: Comparison of coronary stenosis quantitation results from on-line digital and digitized cine film images. Am J Cardiol 62:381-386, 1988.