Clinical practice guidelines in practice and education

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1997, Pages 25-33

  Berg, Alfred O ^a   Atkins, David ^b   Tierney, William ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Academy for Health Services Research and Health Policy   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COST CONTROL; MANAGED CARE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TERMINOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030975680     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.12.s2.4.x     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Eddy DM. A Manual for Assessing Health Practices and Designing Practice Policies: The Explicit Approach. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1992.
2. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine, II: methods for developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:946-52.
3. Ferguson JH. NIH Consensus Conferences: dissemination and impact. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1993;703:180-99.
4. Ferguson JH. The NIH Consensus Development Program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:460-74.
5. American Medical Association. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology Assessment. DATTA Procedures. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; April 1992.
6. Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, et al. A method for the assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2:53-63.
7. Gottlieb LK, Sokol HN, Murrey KO, et al. Algorithm-based clinical quality improvement: clinical guidelines and continuous quality improvement. HMO Pract. 1993;6:5-12.
8. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Ont: Canada Communication Group; 1994.
9. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1996.
10. Eddy DM, ed. Common Screening Tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1991.
11. Sox HC Jr., ed. Common Diagnostic Tests: Use and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1990.
12. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
13. Woolf SH. ACHPR Interim Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1991. AHCPR publication No. 91-0018.
14. McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, et al. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; February 1994. AHCPR publication No. 94-0582.
15. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C, Fahs MC, Mulley AG. Early detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Estimating the risks, benefits, and costs. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:468-79.
16. Office of Technology Assessment. Effectiveness and Costs of Osteoporosis Screening and Hormone Replacement Therapy, Vol II: Evidence on Benefits, Risks, and Costs. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress; August 1995. Publication No. OTA-BP-H-144.
17. Office of Technology Assessment. Costs and Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening in Elderly Men. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress; May 1995. Publication No. OTA-BP-H-145.
18. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Methods for Setting Priorities for Guidelines Development. Field MJ, ed. Setting Priorities for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.
19. Office of Technology Assessment. Identifying Health Technologies That Work: Searching for Evidence. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress; September 1994. Publication No. OTA-H-608.
20. Woolf SH, DiGuiseppi CG, Atkins D, et al. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511-38.
21. Battista RN, Fletcher SW. Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodologic issues. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(suppl): 53-67.
22. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane Collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA. 1995;274:1935-8.
23. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD Guidelines for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. CRD Report No. 4, January 1996. York, England: University of York; 1996.
24. Oxman AD, ed. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Section VI: Preparing and Maintaining Systematic Reviews. Oxford, England: Cochrane Collaboration; 1994.
25. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:130-8.
26. Barnett GO, Winickoff RN, Morgan MM, Zielstorff RD. A computer-based monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Med Care. 1983;21:400-9.
27. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1991;266:538-44.
28. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care: effects of physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24:659-65.
29. Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:108-23.
30. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Computer-assisted order-writing improves compliance with ordering guidelines. Clin Res. 1993;41:716A. Abstract.
31. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Computer reminders to implement preventive care guidelines for hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1551-6.
32. Eddy DM. Designing a practice policy: standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA. 1990;263:3077-82.
33. McDonald CJ. Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:56-62.
34. Sapira JD. On violating Occam's razor. South Med J. 1991; 84:766.
35. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1376-98.
36. Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956-63.
37. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Heart Failure: Evaluation and Care of Patients with Left-Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994. AHCPR publication No. 94-0612.
38. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Takesue BY, et al. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995;2:316-22.
39. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM. Guidelines you can follow and can trust: an ideal and an example. JAMA. 1994;271:872-3.
40. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Improving the Medical Record. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.
41. Rind DM, Safran C, Phillips RS, et al. Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1511-7.
42. Litzelman DK, Tierney WM. Physicians' reasons for failing to comply with computerized preventive care guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:497-9.