Variation among 41 genotypes of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) for Crossability to L. peruvianum (L.) Mill.

Annals of Botany

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 469-477

  Sacks, E J ^a   Gerhardt, L M ^a   Graham, E B ^b   Jacobs, J ^b   Thorrup, T A ^a   St Clair, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Harris Moran Seed Company   (United States)

Author keywords

Interspecific hybridization; Lycopersicon esculentum; Lycopersicon peruvianum; Ovule culture; Speciation

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM;

EID: 0030966293     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0468     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barbano P, Topoleski LD. 1984. Postfertilization hybrid seed failure in Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon peruvianum ovules. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 109: 95-100.
2. BMDP. 1992. BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Cap GB, Roberts PA, Thomason IJ, Murashige T. 1991. Embryo culture of Lycopersicon esculentum × L. peruvianum hybrid genotypes possessing heat-stable resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116: 1082-1088.
4. Chen L, Imanishi S. 1991. Cross-compatability between the cultivated tomato Lvcopersicon esculentum and the wild species L. peruvianum, L. chilense assessed by ovule culture in vitro. Japanese Journal of Breeding 41: 223-230.
5. Choudhury B. 1959. Development of seed and its parts-II of hybrid seed of Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon peruvianum. Indian Journal of Horticulture 16: 23-30.
6. Falconer DS. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical.
7. Foolad MR, Jones RA, Rodriquez RL. 1993. RAPD markers for constructing intraspecific tomato genetic maps. Plant Cell Reports 12: 293-297.
8. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Experimental Cell Research 50: 148-151.
9. Hogenboom NG. 1972. Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. 1. The genus Lycopersicon, its breeding barriers and the importance of breaking these barriers. Euphytica 21: 221-227.
10. Howard HW. 1958. The storage of potato pollen. American Potato Journal 35: 676-678.
11. Imanishi S. 1988. Efficient ovule culture for the hybridization of Lvcopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum, L. glandulosum. Japanese Journal of Breeding 38: 1-9.
12. Kirkham RP, Halloran GM. 1982. Variation in cross-compatibility between cultivated tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, and the wild species Lycopersicon peruvianum (L.) Mill. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuchtung 88: 89-102.
13. Koornneef M. Hanhart C, Jongsma M, Toma I, Weide R, Zabel P, Hille J. 1986. Breeding of a tomato genotype readily accessible to genetic manipulation. Plant Science 45: 201-208.
14. Kuriyama T, Mochizuki H, Sakuma H. 1970. Studies on breeding disease-resistant tomatoes by means of interspecific hybridizations. I. The influence of environment and crossing factors on the success of interspecific hybridization. Engei Shikenjo Hokoku. B (Okitsu) [Bulletin of the Horticultural Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Series B] 10: 51-90.
15. McClean PE, Hanson MR. 1986. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among Lycopersicon and related Solanum species. Genetics 112: 649-667.
16. Meszoly G. 1959. The state and further tasks of tomato breeding. Hungarian Agricultural Review 8: 6.
17. Miller JC, Tanksley SD. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 437-448.
18. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-479.
19. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. 1990. Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D Irwin, Inc.
20. Palmer JD, Xamir D. 1982. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 79: 5006-5010.
21. Philouze J. 1991. Description of isogenic lines, except for one, or two, monogenically controlled morphological traits in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Euphytica 56: 121-131.
22. Porte WS, Walker HB. 1945. A cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and disease resistant L. peruvianum. Phytopathology 35: 931-933.
23. Poysa V. 1990. The development of bridge lines for interspecific gene transfer between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79: 187-192.
24. Rick CM. 1958. The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western South America. Economic Botany 12: 346-367.
25. Rick CM. 1963. Barriers to interbreeding in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17: 216-232.
26. Rick CM. 1976. Natural variability in wild species of Lycopersicon and its bearing on tomato breeding. Genetica agraria 30: 249-259.
27. Rick CM. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD, eds. The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Linnean Society Symposium Series 7: 667-679.
28. Rick CM. 1982. The potential of exotic germplasm for tomato improvement. In: Vasil IK, Scowcroft WR, Frey KJ, eds. Plant improvement and somatic cell genetics. London: Academic Press, 1-28.
29. Rick CM. 1983. Crossability between L. esculentum and a new race of L. peruvianum. Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative 33: 13.
30. Rick CM. 1986. Reproductive isolation in the Lycopersicon peruvianum complex. In: W. G. D'Arcy, ed. Solanaceae: biology and systematics 447-495.
31. Rick CM, Chetelat RT. 1993. TGRC stock lists. Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative 43: 53-78.
32. Rick CM, Chetelat RT. 1995. TGRC stock lists. Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative 45: 53-74.
33. Sacks EJ. 1996. Improving the efficiency of introgressing genes from Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. peruvianum to L. esculentum. PhD Thesis, University of California, Davis, USA.
34. Sacks EJ, St Clair DA. 1996. Cryogenic storage of tomato pollen: effect on fecundity. HortScience 31: 447-448.
35. SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT users guide, release 6.03. Cary. NC: SAS Institute.
36. Segeren MI, Sondahl MR, Siqueira WJ, Medina Filho HP, Nagai H, Lourencao Al. 1993. Tomato breeding: 1. Embryo rescue of interspecific hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and L. peruvianum Mill. Revista Brasileira de Genetica 16: 367-380.
37. Smith PG. 1944. Embryo culture of a tomato species hybrid. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 44: 413-416.
38. Smulders MJM, Bredemeijer G, Rus-Kortekaas W, Arens P, Vosman B. 1997. Use of short microsatellites from database sequences to generate polymorphisms among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars and accessions of other Lycopersicon species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 264-272.
39. Thomas CM, Vos P, Zabeau M, Jones DA, Norcott KA, Chadwick BP, Jones JDG. 1995. Identification of amplified restriction fragment polymorphism (AFLP) markers tightly linked to the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Journal 8: 785-794.
40. Thomas BR, Pratt D. 1981. Efficient hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L.peruvianum via embryo cells. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 59: 215-219.
41. Yeager AF, Purinton HJ. 1946. Lycopersicon peruvianum as a parent in the development of high ascorbic acid tomato varieties. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 48: 403-405.
42. Visser T. 1955. Germination and storage of pollen. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 55: 1-68.