Chronology of three physiological development phases of single-stemmed rose (Rosa hybrida L.) plants in response to increment in light quantum integral

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 69, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 107-115

  Bredmose, Niels ^a  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Blind shoots; Bud and shoot growth; Cut rose; Daily quantum integral; Development phases; Flowering; Single stemmed roses

Indexed keywords

ROSA; ROSA HYBRID CULTIVAR; ROSA HYBRIDA;

EID: 0030921281     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4238(96)00997-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ballarè C.L., Scopel, A.L. and Sànchez, R.A., 1990. Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science, 247: 329-332.
2. Berninger, E., 1994. Development rate of young greenhouse rose plants (Rosa hybrida) rooted from cuttings in relation to temperature and irradiance. Sci. Hortic., 58: 235-251.
3. Bredmose, N., 1990. Effects of year-round supplementary irradiance on shoot development, flowering and quality of two rose cultivars. 23rd International Horticultural Congress. Abstracts of contributed papers: 3259. Florence, 1990, (I.S.H.S.).
4. Bredmose, N., 1993. Effects of year-round supplementary lighting on shoot development, flowering and quality of two glasshouse rose cultivars. Sci. Hortic., 54: 69-85.
5. Bredmose, N., 1994. Biological efficiency of supplementary lighting on cut roses the year round. Sci. Hortic., 59: 75-82.
6. Bredmose, N., 1995. High utilization ratio of supplementary light by cut roses at all times of the year. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 60: 125-131.
7. Bredmose, N. and Hansen, J., 1996. Topophysis affects the potential of axillary bud growth, fresh biomass accumulation and specific fresh weight in single-stem roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Ann. Bot., 78: 215-222.
8. Carpenter, W.J. and Rodriguez, R.C., 1971. Supplemental lighting effects on newly planted and cut-back roses. HortScience, 6: 207-208.
9. de Vries, D.P., de Kuyper, E.P.M. and Dubois, L.A.M., 1981. Anatomy of flower differentiation and abortion in relation to the growth and development of hybrid Tea-rose seedlings. Sci. Hortic., 14: 377-385.
10. Horridge, J.S. and Cockshull, K.E., 1974. Flower initiation and development in glasshouse rose. Sci. Hortic., 2: 273-284.
11. Hubbell, D.S., 1934. A morphological study of blind and flowering rose shoots, with special reference to flower bud differentiation. J. Agric. Res., 48: 91-95.
12. Jensen, H.E.K. and Hansen, W., 1971. Keeping quality of roses I. The influence of the stage of maturity at the time of harvest on the longevity and opening of the flower. Danish J. Plant Soil Sci., 75: 591-596.
13. Maas, F.M., Hofman-Eijer, L.B. and Hulsteijn, K., 1995. Flower morphogenesis in Rosa hybrida 'Mercedes' as studied by cryo-scanning electron and light microscopy. Effects of light and shoot position on a branch. Ann. Bot., 75: 199-205.
14. Marcelis-van Acker, C.A.M., 1994. Effect of assimilate supply on development and growth potential of axillary buds in roses. Ann. Bot., 73: 415-420.
15. Moe, R., 1971. Effects of daylength, light intensity, and temperature on growth and flowering in roses. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 97: 796-800.
16. Moe, R., 1972. Factors affecting flower abortion and malformation in roses. Physiol. Plant., 24: 291-300.
17. Mor, Y., Halevy, A.H. and Porath, D., 1980. Characterization of the light reaction in promoting the mobilizing ability of rose shoot tips. Plant Physiol., 66: 996-1000.
18. Mortensen, L.M., 1995. Diurnal carbon dioxide exchange rates of greenhouse roses under artificial light as compared with daylight conditions in summer. Acta Agric. Scand. B, Soil Plant Sci. 45: 148-152.
19. Mortensen, L.M., Gislerød, H.R. and Mikkelsen, H., 1992. Effects of different levels of supplementary lighting on the year-round yield of cut roses. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 57: 198-202.
20. Nell, T.A. and Rasmussen, H.P., 1979. Blindness in roses: effect of high intensity light and blind shoot prediction techniques. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 104: 21-25.
21. Post, K. and Howland, J.E., 1946. The influence of nitrate level and light intensity on the growth and production of greenhouse roses. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 47: 446-450.
22. Sachs, R.M., 1977. Nutrient diversion: an hypothesis to explain the chemical control of flowering. HortScience, 12: 220-222.
23. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., 1988. SAS Users Guide. Statistics. Version 5.18, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
24. van den Berg, G.A., 1987. Influence of temperature on bud break, shoot growth, flower bud atrophy and winter production of glasshouse roses. Dissertation, Agricultural University of Wageningen, Pudoc, Wageningen, 170 pp.
25. Wallen, C.C., 1970. World Survey of Climatology. Vol. 5, Climate of Northern and Western Europe. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 239 pp..
26. Zieslin, N. and Mor, Y., 1990. Light on roses. A review. Sci. Hortic., 43: 1-14.