Topophysis affects the potential of axillary bud growth, fresh biomass accumulation and specific fresh weight in single-stem roses (Rosa hybrida L.)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 215-222

  Bredmose, Niels ^a,b,c   Hansen, Jürgen ^a,b,c  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

^b Research Group for Floriculture   (Denmark)

^c Res Grp Plant Breed/Propagation   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Apical dominance; axillary bud growth; cut rose; flowering; fresh biomass accumulation; quality; Rosa hybrida L.; Rosaceae; rose; shoot growth; single stem roses; specific fresh weight; topophysis

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; ROSA; ROSA HYBRID CULTIVAR; ROSA HYBRIDA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 0029844068     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0115     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bredmose N. 1993. Effects of year-round supplementary lighting on shoot development, flowering and quality of two glasshouse rose cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 54: 69-85.
2. Bredmose N, Hansen J. 1995. Regeneration, growth and flowering of cut rose cultivars as affected by propagation material and method. Scientia Horticulturae 64: 103-111.
3. Bressan PH, Kim YJ, Hyndman SE, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. 1982. Factors affecting in vitro propagation of roses. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 107: 979-990.
4. Büsgen M, Münch E. 1927. Bau und Leben unserer Waldbäume. 3. Aüflage. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1-426.
5. Carr DJ. 1984. Positional information and plant morphology. In: Barlow PW, Carr DJ. eds. Positional controls in plant development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 349-374.
6. Cline MG. 1991. Apical dominance. The Botanical Review 57: 318-358.
7. Cline MG. 1994. The role of hormones in apical dominance. New approaches to an old problem in plant development. Physiologia Plantarum 90: 230-237.
8. Cockshull KE, Horridge JS. 1977. Apical dominance and flower initiation in the rose. Journal of Horticultural Science 52: 421-427.
9. De Vries DP. 1993. The rigour of glasshouse roses: scion-roolstocks relationships: effects of phenotypic and genotypic variation. Dissertation Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Drukkerij Jan Evers, 1-170
10. De Vries DP, Dubois LAM. 1992. Variation in the shoot production of 'Sonia' cut rose plants, originating from grafting scions of different nodal positions. Gartenbauwissenschaft 57: 64-68.
11. Doorenbos J. 1965. Juvenile and adult phases in woody plants. In: Ruhland W. ed. Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Vol. XV Differentiation and development. Pan 1. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1222-1235.
12. Fortanier EJ, Jonkers H. 1976. Juvenility and maturity of plants as influenced by their ontogenetical and physiological ageing. Acta Horticulturae 56: 37-43.
13. Halevy AH. 1972. Phytohormones in flowering regulation of self-inductive plants. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Horticultural Congress V. Tel Aviv. Israel, 1970. 187-198.
14. Halim H, Edwards GR, Coombe BG, Aspinall D. 1988. The dormancy of buds of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck inserted into rootstock stems: factors intrinsic to the inserted bud. Annals of Botany 61: 525-529.
15. Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB. 1978. Tropical trees and foresis - an architectural analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1-441.
16. Hansen J. 1986. Influence of cutting position and stem length on rooting of leaf-bud cuttings of Schefflera arboricola. Scientia Horticulturae 28: 177-186
17. Hansen J. 1989. Influence of cutting position and temperature during rooting on adventitious root formation and axillary bud break of Stephanotis floribiinda. Scientia Horticulturae 40: 345-354.
18. Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FT Jr. 1990. Plant propagation principles and practices Fifth edition. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1-647.
19. Horridge JS, Cockshull KE. 1974. Flower initiation and development in the glasshouse rose. Scientia Horticulturae 2: 273-284.
20. 14C-sucrose uptake by single-node explants of rose flower stems. Physiologia Plantarium 50: 251-254.
21. Jensen HEK, Hansen W. 1971. Keeping quality of roses I. The influence of the stage of maturity at the time of harvest on the longevity and opening of the flower Danish Journal of Plant and Soil Science 75: 591-596.
22. Jones WW, Coggins CW Jr, Embleton TW. 1976. Endogenous abscisic acid in relation to bud growth in alternate bearing 'Valencia' orange. Plant Physiology 58: 681-682.
23. Kenneth JH. 1963. Henderson's dictionary of biological terms. Eighth edition. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd Limited, 1-640.
24. McDaniel CN, Hsu FC. 1976. Position-dependent development of tobacco meristems. Nature 259: 564-565.
25. McDaniel CN, Sangrey KA, Singer SR. 1989. Node counting in axillary buds of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Wisconsin 38, a day-neutral plant. American Journal of Botany 76: 403-408.
26. Marcelis-van Acker CAM. 1994a. Development and growth potential of axillary buds in roses as affected by bud age. Annals of Botany 74: 437-443.
27. Marcelis-van Acker CAM. 1994b. Axillary bud development in rose. Dissertation Wageningen Agricultural University. Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1-131.
28. Marcelis-van Acker CAM, Scholten HJ. 1995. Development of axillary buds of rose in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae 63: 47-55.
29. Moe R. 1971. Factors affecting flower abortion and malformation in roses. Physiologia Plantarum 24: 291-300.
30. Molisch H. 1916. Pflanzenphysiologie als Theorie der Gärtnerei. 1. Aüflage. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1-306.
31. Molisch H. 1929. Die Lebensdauer der Pflanze. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer. 1-168.
32. Olesen PO. 1978. On cyclophysis and topophysis. Silvae Genetica 27: 173-178
33. Robbins WJ. 1964. Topophysis, a problem in somatic inheritance. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 108: 395-403.
34. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell M. 1959. Investigations on aging of apical meristems in woody plants and its importance in silviculture. Det Forstlige Forsogsvœsen i Danmark 25: 307-455.
35. Seeliger R. 1924. Topophysis und Zyklophysis pflanzlicher Organe und ihre Bedeutung für die Pflanzenkultur. Angewandte Botanik 6: 191-200.
36. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc. 1988. SAS Users Guide. Statistics Version 5.18. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
37. White JW, Richter D. 1973. Supplementary fluorescent lighting and low moisture stress improve growth of greenhouse roses. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 98: 605-607.
38. Zamski E, Oshri S, Zieslin N. 1985. Comparative morphology and anatomy of axillary buds along a rose shoot. Botanical Gazette 146: 208-212
39. Zieslin N, Haaze H, Halevy AH. 1976. Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. II. The effect of bud position on degree of inhibition. Botanical Gazelle 137: 297-300.
40. Zieslin N, Halevy AH. 1976. Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. I. The effect of different plant parts (correlative inhibition). Botanical Gazette 137: 291-296.
41. Zieslin N, Spiegelstein H, Halevy AH. 1978. Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. IV. Inhibitory activity of plant extracts. Botanical Gazette 139: 64-68.