Functional outcome of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke patients after in-patient rehabilitation: A matched comparison

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 177-182

  Chae, John ^a,c   Zorowitz, Richard D ^a,b   Johnston, Mark V ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b KESSLER INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral Ischemia; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT TREATMENT;

CEREBRAL ISCHEMIA; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENT MEASURE; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME; HEMORRHAGIC STROKE PATIENTS; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; NONHEMORRHAGIC STOKE PATIENTS; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PROGNOSIS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0030152244     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199605000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Heart Association: Heart and Stroke Facts, 1994. Statistical supplement, Dallas, Texas, 1993.
2. Lefkovits J, Davis SM, Rossiter SC, et al.: Acute stroke outcome: effect of stroke type and risk factors. Aust N Z J Med 1992:22:30-35.
3. Bamford J: Clinical examination in diagnosis and subclassification of stroke. Lancet 1992;339:400-402.
4. Hachinski V: Classification of stroke for clinical trials. Stroke 1990;21:II-27-II-29.
5. Wolf PA: An overview of the epidemiology of stroke. Stroke 1990;21:II-4-II-6.
6. Fogelholm R, Nuutila M, Vuorela AL: Primary intracerebral haemorrhage in the Jyväskylä region, Central Finland, 1985-89: incidence, case fatality rate and functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:546-552.
7. Helweg-Larsen S, Sommer W, Strange P, Lester J, Boysen G: Prognosis for patients treated conservatively for spontaneous intracerebral hematomas. Stroke 1984;15:1045-1048.
8. Kinkle WR: Classification of stroke by neuroimaging technique. Stroke 1990;21:II-7-II-8.
9. Chae J, Zorowitz R, Johnston M: Stroke subtype predicts functional independence (abstract). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73:145.
10. Kunitz S, Gross D, Heyman A, et al.: The pilot stroke data bank: definitions, design, and data. Stroke 1984;4:740-746.
11. Granger C, Hamilton B: Measurement of stroke rehabilitation outcome in the 1980's. Stroke 1990;21:II-46-II-47.
12. Dodds T, Martin D, Stolov W, Deyo R: A validation of the Functional Independence Measure and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531-536.
13. Linacre J, Heinemann A, Wright B, Granger C, Hamilton B: The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-132.
14. Heinemann A, Linacre J, Wright B, Hamilton B, Granger C: Relationship between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:566-573.
15. Adams R, Victor M: Principles of Neurology, ed 5. New York, McGraw Hill, 1993.
16. Cushman L: Secondary neuropsychiatric complications in stroke: implications for acute care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69: 877-879.
17. Mysiw W, Beegan J, Gatens P: Prospective cognitive assessment of stroke patients before inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989;68:168-171.
18. Novack T, Haban G, Graham K, Satterfield W: Prediction of stroke rehabilitation and outcome from psychologic screening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:729-733.
19. Lachat S, Judge J, Piotrowaska-Nyerisc K: Functional assessment-factors predictive of outcome from stroke. Phys Med Rehabil State of the Art Reviews 1989;3:457-467.
20. Galski T, Bruno R, Zorowitz R, Walker J: Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in rehabilitation of stroke patients: the dominant role of higher-order cognition. Stroke 1993;24:1794-1800.
21. Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, Olsen T: Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:852-857.
22. Tatemichi T, Desmond D, Stern Y, et al.: Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional ability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:202-207.
23. Miller LS, Miyamoto AT: Computed tomography: its potential as a predictor of functional recovery following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979;60:108-109.
24. Hertanu JS, Deompoulos JT, Yang WC, Calhoun WF, Fenigstein HA: Stroke rehabilitation: correlation and prognostic value of computerized tomography and sequential functional assessments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:505-508.
25. Chaudhuri G, Harvey R, Sulton L, Lambert RW: Computerized tomography head scan as predictors of functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:496-498.
26. Saeki S, Ogata H, Hachisuka K, Okubo T, Takahashi K, Hoshuyam T: Association between location of the lesion and discharge status of ADL in first stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:858-860.
27. Steiner I, Gomori JM, Melamed E: The prognostic value of the CT scan in conservatively treated patients with intracerebral hematoma. Stroke 1984;15:279-282.
28. Portenoy RK, Lipton RB, Berger AR, Lesser ML, Lantos G: Intracerebral haemorrhage: a model for the prediction of outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:976-979.
29. Reding M, Potes E: Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke: Life table analysis approach. Stroke 1988;19:1354-1358.
30. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf P, Kannel W, Sytkowski P, D'Agostino R, Gresham G: Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalization following stroke: the Framington study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:415-418.
31. Jongbloed L: Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 1986;17:765-776.
32. Johnston M, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Shiflett S: Prediction of outcome following rehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation 1993;2:51-76.
33. Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Lempinen M: The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke 1984;15:1039-1044.
34. Boureston NC: Predictors of long-term recovery in cerebrovascular disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1967;48:415-419.
35. Wade DT, Hewer RL, Wood VA: Stroke: influence of patient's sex and side of weakness on outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:513-516.
36. Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC, Richards B, Laycock PJ: Stroke: does side matter? Rheumatol Rehabil 1982;21:175-178.
37. Mills VM, DiGenio M: Functional difference in patients with left or right cerebrovascular accidents. Phys Ther 1983;63:481-488.
38. Bernspang B, Fisher A: Differences between persons with right or left cerbral vascular accident on the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:1144-1151.
39. Duncan P, Goldstein L, Matchar D, Divine G, Feussner J: Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirement. Stroke 1992;23:1084-1089.
40. Jørgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen T: Outcome and tiem course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406-412.
41. Johnston MV, Ottenbacher KJ, Reichardt CS: Strong quasi-experimental designs for research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74:383-392.