Segmental regulation of Hoxb-3 by kreisler

Nature

Volumn 387, Issue 6629, 1997, Pages 191-195

  Manzanares, Miguel ^a   Cordes, Sabine ^b,d   Kwan, Chung Tin ^c   Sham, Mai Har ^c   Barsh, Greg S ^b   Krumlauf, Robb ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CHICKEN; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TRANSGENE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; AVIAN PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; CHICK EMBRYO; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENHANCER ELEMENTS (GENETICS); GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; LEUCINE ZIPPERS; MAFB TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; ONCOGENE PROTEINS; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-ETS; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SEQUENCE DELETION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UP-REGULATION; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 0030906395     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/387191a0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lumsden, A. & Krumlauf, R. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274, 1109-1115 (1996).
2. Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Bradley, A. & Krumlauf, R. Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1. Nature 384, 630-634 (1996).
3. Goddard, J., Rossel, M., Manley, N. & Capecchi, M. Mice with targeted disruption of Hoxb1 fail to form the motor nucleus of the VIIth nerve. Development 122, 3217-3228 (1996).
4. Cordes, S. P. & Barsh, G. S. The mouse segmentation gene kr encodes a novel basic domain-leucine zipper transcription factor. Cell 79, 1025-1034 (1994).
5. Hunt, P. et al. A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the head. Nature 253, 861-864 (1991).
6. Deol, M. The abnormalities of the inner ear in kreisler mice. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 12, 475-490 (1964).
7. Frohman, M. A., Martin, G. R., Cordes, S., Halamek, L. P. & Barsh, G. S. Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant kreiser (kr). Development 117, 925-936 (1993).
8. McKay, I. J. et al. The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres. Development 120, 2199-2211 (1994).
9. McKay, I. & Lumsden, A. Motor neuron defects in the kreisler mutant mouse. Eur. J. Neurosci. (in the press).
10. Swiatek, P. J. & Gridley, T. Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox-20. Genes Dev. 7, 2071-2084 (1993).
11. Schneider-Maunoury, S. et al. Disruption of Krox-20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 75, 1199-1214 (1993).
12. Carpenter, E. M., Goddard, J. M., Chisaka, O., Manley, N. R. & Capecchi, M. R. Loss of Hoxa-1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain. Development 118, 1063-1075 (1993).
13. Dolle, P. et al. Local alterations of Krox-20 and Hox gene expression in the hindbrain of Hox-1(Hox-1.6) homozygote null mutant embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7666-7670 (1993).
14. Mark, M. et al. Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice. Development 119, 319-338 (1993).
15. Nonchev, S. et al. The conserved role of Krox-20 in directing Hox gene expression during vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9339-9345 (1996).
16. Kataoka, K., Noda, N. & Nishizawa, M. Maf nuclear oncoprotein recognizes sequences related to an AP-1 sites and forms heterodimers with both Fos and Jun. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 700-712 (1994).
17. Kataoka, K., Fujiwara, K. T., Noda, M. & Nishizawa, M. MafB, a new Maf family transcription activator that can associate with Maf and Fos but not with Jun. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7581-7591 (1994).
18. Nye, J., Petersen, J., Gunther, C., Jonsen, M. & Graves, B. Interaction of murine Ets-1 with GGA-binding sites establishes the ETS domain as a new DNA binding motif. Genes Dev. 6, 975-990 (1992).
19. Shore, P. et al. Determinants of DNA binding specificity of ETS-domain transcription factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3338-3349 (1996).
20. Wasylyk, B. et al. The c-ets proto-oncogenes encode transcription factors that cooperate with c-Fos and c-Jun for transcriptional activation. Nature 346, 191-193 (1990).
21. Treier, M., Bohmann, D. & Mlozik, M. JUN cooperates with the Ets domain protein Pointed to induce photoreceptor R7 fate in the Drosophila eye. Cell 83, 753-776 (1995).
22. Sieweke, M., Tekotte, H., Frampton, J. & Graf, T. MafB is an interaction partner and represser of Ets-1 that inhibits erythroid differentiation. Cell 85, 49-60 (1996).
23. Maroulakou, I., Papas, T. & Green, I. Differential expression of ets-1 and ets-2 proto-oncogenes during murine embryogenesis. Oncogene 9, 1551-1565 (1994).
24. Whiting, J. et al. Multiple spatially specific enhancers are required to reconstruct the pattern of Hox-2.6 gene expression. Genes Dev. 5, 2048-2059 (1991).
25. Vee, S.-P. & Rigby, P. W. J. The regulation of myogenin gene expression during the embryonic development of the mouse. Genes Dev. 7, 1277-1289 (1993).
26. Sham, M.-H. et al. Analysis of the murine Hox-2.7 gene: conserved alternative transcripts with differential distributions in the nervous system and the potential for shared regulatory regions. EMBO J. 11, 1825-1836 (1992).