Across-object relationships in perceived object orientation

Vision Research

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 879-884

  Burbeck, C A ^a,b   Zauberman, G S ^b  

^a University of North Carolina   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Orientation; Shape

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; ROTATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030889848     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00232-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ariely D., Burbeck C.A. Statistical encoding of multiple stimuli: a theory of distributed representation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36:1995;S472.
2. Burbeck C.A. Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgments. Vision Research. 27:1987;417-427.
3. Burbeck C.A., Maher S.J. Identical distractors aren't identical. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;S532.
4. Burbeck C.A., Pizer S.M. Object representation by cores: identifying and representing primitive spatial regions. Vision Research. 35:1995;1917-1930.
5. Burbeck C.A., Pizer S.M., Morse B.S., Ariely D., Zauberman G.S., Rolland J.P. Linking object boundaries at scale: a common mechanism for size and shape judgments. Vision Research. 36:1996;361-372.
6. Caelli T., Brettel H., Rentschler I., Hilz R. Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain. Vision Research. 23:1983;129-133.
7. Finney, D.J. (1971). Probit analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Heeley D.W., Buchanan-Smith H.M. Evidence for separate, task dependent noise processes in orientation and size perception. Vision Research. 34:1994;2059-2069.
9. Kooi F.L., De Valois R.L., Switkes E. Spatial localization across channels. Vision Research. 31:1991;1627-1631.
10. Kovacs I., Julesz B. Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes. Nature. 370:1994;644-646.
11. Lee T.S., Mumford D., Schiller P.H. Neural correlates of boundary and medical axis representation in primate striate cortex. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 36:1995;s477.
12. Matin E., Rubsamen C., Vannata D. Orientation discrimination as a function of orientation and spatial frequency. Perception & Psychophysics. 41:1987;303-307.
13. Orban, G.A. (1984). Neuronal operators in the visual cortex. Berlin: Springer.
14. Orban G.A., Vandenbussche E., Vogels R. Human orientation discrimination tested with long stimuli. Vision Research. 24:1984;121-128.
15. Paradiso M.A. A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex. Biological Cybernetics. 58:1988;35-49.
16. Picard R.W., Gorkani M. Finding perceptually dominant orientations in natural textures. Spatial Vision. 8:1994;221-253.
17. Pizer, S.M., Eberly, D., Morse, B.S. & Fritsch, D. (1997). Zoom-invariant vision of figural shape: the mathematics of cores. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, in press.
18. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Postadaptation orientation discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;147-155.
19. Sperling, G. (1989). Three stages and two systems of visual processing. Spatial Vision, 183-207.
20. Wang X.F., Burbeck C.A. Enhanced position sensitivity at scaled medical loci. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;S169.