Linking object boundaries at scale: A common mechanism for size and shape judgments

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 361-372

  Burbeck, Christina A ^a   Pizer, Stephen M ^a   Morse, Bryan S ^b   Ariely, Dan ^a   Zauberman, Gal S ^a   Rolland, Jannick P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Brigham Young University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bisection; Scaling; Separation; Shape; Size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

EID: 0030040368     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00106-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Burbeck, C. A. (1987). Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgments. Vision Research, 27, 417-427.
2. Burbeck, C. A. (1992). Separation discrimination with embedded targets. Vision Research, 32, 2295-2302.
3. Burbeck, C. A. & Hadden, S. (1993). Scaled position integration areas: Accounting for Weber's law for separation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 10,. 5-15.
4. Burbeck, C. A. & Pizer, S. M. (1995). Object representation by cores: Identifying and representing primitive spatial regions. Vision Research, 35, 1917-1930.
5. Graham, N. Van S. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Hess, R. F. & Badcock, D. R. (1995). Metric for separation discrimination by the human visual system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 12, 3-10.
7. Kimia, B. B., Tannenbaum, A. R. & Zucker, S. W. (1992). The shape triangle: Parts, protrusions, and bends. Technical Report TR-92-15. Montreal, Canada: McGill University Research Center for Intelligent Machines.
8. Kimia, B. B., Tannenbaum, A. R. & Zucker, S. W. (1995). Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: The components of shape and the reaction-diffusion space. International Journal of Computer Vision, in press.
9. Klein. S. A. & Levi, D. M. (1985). Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: Theoretical predictions and empirical validation. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 1170-1190.
10. Kovacs, I. & Julesz, B. (1994). Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes. Nature, 370, 644-646.
11. Lee, T. S., Mumford, D. & Schiller, P. H. (1995). Neuronal correlates of boundary and medial axis representations in primate striate cortex. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Annual Meeting, Abstr. #2205.
12. Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In Blakemore, C. (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411-422). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Pizer, S. M., Burbeck, C. A., Coggins, J. M., Fritsch, D. S. & Morse, B. S. (1994). Object shape before boundary shape: Scale-space medial axes. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 4, 303-313.
14. Toet, A. & Koenderink, J. J. (1988). Differential spatial displacement discrimination thresholds for Gabor patches. Vision Research, 28, 133-143.
15. Van Essen, D. D. & Anderson, C. H. (1990). Information processing strategies and pathways in the primate retina and visual cortex. In An introduction to neural and electronic networks. New York: Academic Press.
16. Wilson, H. R. (1986). Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity. Vision Research, 26, 453-469.
17. Wolfe, H. K. (1923). On the estimation of the middle of lines. American Journal of Psychology, 34, 313-358.