Current and future approaches to neurotoxicity risk assessment

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 825, Issue , 1997, Pages 406-418

  Slikker Jr , William ^a   Sobotka, Thomas J ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEROTONIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SCREENING; FEMALE; MALE; NEUROTOXICOLOGY; NONHUMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEROTONIN BRAIN LEVEL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0030862476     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48452.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. National Research Council (NRC). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government. Managing the Process. Washington, DC.
2. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB). 1986. Predicting Neurotoxicity and Behavioral Dysfunction from Prelinical Toxicologic Data: Final Report, Task Order #3, Contract No. FDA 223-83-2020. Food and Drug Administration. Washington D.C.
3. SOBOTKA, T. J. 1986. The regulatory perspective of diet-behavior relationships. Nutr. Rev. 44: 241-245.
4. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology (NAS/NRC). 1975. Principles for Evaluating Chemicals in the Environment. 198-216. National Academy of Sciences Press. Washington, D.C.
5. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (NAS/NCR). 1982. Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities for Toxicity Testing. Vol. 2. National Academy of Sciences Press. Washington, DC.
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1982. Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Color Additives Used in Foods. Document PB83-170696. National Technical Information Service. Springfield, VA.
7. World Health Organization (WHO). 1986. Principles and Methods for the Assessment of Neurotoxocity Associated with Exposure to Chemicals. Environmental Health Criteria Document #60. World Health Organization Press. Geneva, Switzerland.
8. SOBOTKA, T. J., K. B. EKELMAN, W. SLIKKER, JR., K. RAFFAELE & D. G. HATTAN. 1996. Food and Drug Administration proposed guidelines for neurotoxicological testing of food chemicals. Neurotoxicology 17(3-4): 825-836.
9. CHANG, L. W. & W. SLIKKER, JR., Eds. 1995. Neurotoxicology: Approaches and Methods. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego.
10. DEUEL, R. K. 1977. Determining sensory deficits in animals. In Methods in Psychobiology. Myers, R., Ed. 99-125. Academic Press. New York, NY.
11. MOSER, V. C., J. P. MCCORMIC, J. P. CREASON & R. C. MACPHAIL. 1988. Comparison of chlordimeform and carbaryl using a functional observational battery. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 11: 189-206.
12. REITER, L. W., H. A. TILSON, J. DOUGHERTY, G. J. HARRY, C. J. JONES, S. MCMASTER, W. SLIKKER, JR. & T. J. SOBOTKA. 1994. Final report: principles of neurotoxicity risk assessment. Federal Register 59(158): 42360-42404.
13. WIER, P. J., F. J. GUERRIERO & R. F. WALKER. 1989. Implantation of a primary screen for developmental neurotoxicity. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 13: 118-136.
14. BUELKE-SAM, J., C. A. KIMMEL & J. ADAMS. 1985. Design considerations in screening for behavioral teratogens: results of the collaborative behavioral teratology study. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 7: 537-789.
15. KIMMEL, C. A., D. C. REES & E. Z. FRANCIS. 1990. Qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 12(3): 171-292.
16. NELSON, B. K. 1991. Selecting exposure parameters in developmental neurotoxicity assessments. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 13: 569-573.
17. RODIER, P. M. 1990. Developmental neurotoxicology. Toxicol. Pathol. 18: 89-95.
18. SPENCER, P. S., M. C. BISCHOFF & H. H. SCHAUMBERG. 1980. Neuropathological methods for the detection of neurotoxic disease. In Experimental and Clinical Neurotoxicology. P. S. Spencer & H. D. Schaumber, Eds. 743-757. Williams and Wilkins Press. Baltimore, MD.
19. SLIKKER, W., JR. & D. GAYLOR 1995. Risk assessment strategies for neuroprotective agents. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 765: 198-208.
20. CRUMP, K. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 4: 854-871.
21. GAYLOR, D. W. & W. SLIKKER, JR. 1990. Risk assessments for neurotoxic effects. Neurotoxicology 11: 211-218.
22. KODELL, R. L. & R. W. WEST. 1993. Upper confidence limits on excess risk for quantitative responses. Risk Anal. 13: 177-182.
23. CRUMP, K. 1995. Calculations of benchmark doses from continuous data. Risk Anal. 15: 79-89.
24. SLIKKER, W., JR. & D. W. GAYLOR. 1990. Biologically based dose-response model for neurotoxicity risk assessment. Korean J. Toxicol. 6: 204-213.
25. SLIKKER, W., JR. & D. GAYLOR. 1995. Concepts on quantitative risk assessment of neurotoxicants. In Neurotoxicology Approaches and Methods. L. W. Chang & W. Slikker, Jr., Eds. 771-776. Academic Press. San Diego.