Constancy of the relative biological effectiveness of 42 MeV (p→Be+) neutrons among cell lines with different DNA repair proficiencies

Radiation Research

Volumn 148, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 308-316

  Britten, Richard A ^a,b   Murray, David ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c CROSS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; FAST NEUTRON RADIATION; GAMMA RADIATION; GENE MUTATION; IONIZING RADIATION; LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION INJURY;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHO CELLS; CHROMOSOMES; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GAMMA RAYS; LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER; NEUTRONS; RADIATION TOLERANCE; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS;

EID: 0030842651     PISSN: 00337587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3579515     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. G. W. Barendsen, Responses of cultured cells, tumours and normal tissues to radiations of different linear energy transfer. Curr. Top. Radiat. Res. Q. 4, 293-356 (1968).
2. +) neutrons of human cells differing in photon sensitivity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 61, 805-812 (1992).
3. +) fast neutrons and 4 MeV photons. Radiother. Oncol. 30, 83-89 (1994).
4. K. Sakai, S. Suzuki, N. Nakamura and S. Okada, Induction and subsequent repair of DNA damage by fast neutrons in cultured mammalian cells. Radiat. Res. 110, 311-320 (1987).
5. E. J. Hall, L. Roizin-Towle, R. B. Theus and L. S. August, Radiobiological properties of high-energy cyclotron-produced neutrons used for radiotherapy. Radiology 117, 173-178 (1975).
6. B. Fertil, P. J. Deschavanne, J. Gueulette, A. Possoz, A. Wambersie and E. P. Malaise, In vitro radiosensitivity of six human cell lines. II. Relation to the RBE of 50-MeV neutrons. Radiat. Res. 90, 526-537 (1982).
7. G. W. Barendsen, The relationships between RBE and LET for different types of lethal damage in mammalian cells: Biophysical and molecular mechanisms. Radiat. Res. 139, 257-270 (1994).
8. D. T. Goodhead, Molecular and cell models of biological effects of heavy ion radiation. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 34, 67-72 (1995).
9. J. F. Ward, Biochemistry of DNA lesions. Radiat. Res. 104, S103-S111 (1985).
10. D. T. Goodhead, Physics of radiation action: Microscopic features that determine biological consequences. In Radiation Research 1895-1995 (U. Hagen, H. Jung and C. Streffer, Eds.), Vol. 1, p. 9. Universitätsdrucken H. Stürtz AG, Würzburg, 1995. [Abstract]
11. H. Nikjoo, P. O'Neill, M. Terrissol and D. T. Goodhead, Modelling of radiation-induced DNA damage: the early physical and chemical event. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66, 453-457 (1994).
12. J. S. Rubin and G. F. Whitmore, DNA repair-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells exhibiting differential sensitivity to γ rays under aerobic and hypoxic conditions. Radiat. Res. 101, 528-534 (1985).
13. D. Murray, A. Macann, J. Hanson and E. Rosenberg, ERCC1/ERCC4 5′-endonuclease activity as a determinant of hypoxic cell radiosensitivity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69, 319-327 (1996).
14. D. Murray, A. Prager, R. E. Meyn, S. Davison and A. D. Green, Relationships between DNA damage and the survival of radiosensitive mutant Chinese hamster cell lines exposed to γ radiation: Part 2. Effect of cellular redox status. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 63, 199-206 (1993).
15. D. Murray and E. Rosenberg. The importance of the ERCC1/ERCC4[XPF] complex for hypoxic-cell radioresistance does not appear to derive from its participation in the nucleotide excision repair pathway. Mutat. Res. 364, 217-226 (1996).
16. E. C. Friedberg, G. C. Walker and W. Siede, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, DC, 1995.
17. L. M. Kemp, S. G. Sedgwick and P. A. Jeggo, X-ray sensitive mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells defective in double-strand break rejoining. Mutat. Res. 132, 189-196 (1984).
18. J. Thacker and A. Stretch, Responses of 4 X-ray-sensitive CHO cell mutants to different radiations and to irradiation conditions promoting cellular recovery. Mutat. Res. 146, 99-108 (1985).
19. L. H. Thompson, J. S. Rubin, J. E. Cleaver, G. F. Whitmore and K. Brookman, A screening method for isolating DNA repair-deficient mutants of CHO cells. Somat. Cell Genet. 6, 391-405 (1980).
20. L. H. Thompson, D. B. Busch, K. Brookman, C. L. Mooney and D. A. Glaser, Genetic diversity of UV-sensitive DNA repair mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3734-3737 (1981).
21. L. H. Thompson, S. Fong and K. Brookman, Validation of conditions for efficient detection of HPRT and APRT mutations in suspension-cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutat. Res. 74, 21-36 (1980).
22. L. H. Thompson, L. L. Bachinski, R. L. Stallings, G. Dolf, C. A. Weber, A. Westerveld and M. J. Siciliano, Complementation of repair gene mutations on the hemizygous chromosome 9 in CHO: A third repair gene on human chromosome 19. Genomics 5, 670-679 (1989).
23. L. H. Thompson, K. W. Brookman, L. E. Dillehay, A. V. Carrano, J. A. Mazrimas, C. L. Mooney and J. L. Minkler, A CHO-cell strain having hypersensitivity to mutagens, a defect in DNA strand-break repair and an extraordinary baseline frequency of sister-chromatid exchange. Mutat. Res. 95, 427-440 (1982).
24. K. W. Caldecott, J. D. Tucker, L. H. Stanker and L. H. Thompson, Characterization of the XRCC1-DNA ligase III complex in vitro and its absence from mutant hamster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4836-4843 (1995).
25. L. H. Thompson, K. W. Brookman, N. J. Jones, S. A. Allen and A. V. Carrano, Molecular cloning of the human XRCC1 gene, which corrects defective DNA strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 6160-6171 (1990).
26. L. L. Bachinski, R. Krahe, B. F. White, B. Wieringa, D. Shaw, R. Korneluk, L. H. Thompson, K. Johnson and M. J. Siciliano, An informative panel of somatic cell hybrids for physical mapping on human chromosome 19q. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52, 375-387 (1993).
27. P. A. Jeggo and L. M. Kemp, X-ray-sensitive mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Isolation and cross-sensitivity to other DNA-damaging agents. Mutat. Res. 112, 313-327 (1983).
28. D. T. Weaver, What to do at an end: DNA double-strand-break repair. Trends Genet. 11, 388-392 (1995).
29. C. W. Anderson, Protein kinases and the response to DNA damage. Semin. Cell Biol. 5, 427-136 (1994).
30. R. C. Getts and T. D. Stamato, Absence of a Ku-like DNA end binding activity in the xrs double-strand DNA repair-deficient mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 15981-15984 (1994).
31. W. K. Rathmell and G. Chu, Involvement of the Ku autoantigen in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7623-7627 (1994).
32. C. M Ross, J. J. Eady, N. P. Mithal, C. Bush, G. G. Steel, P. A. Jeggo and T. J. McMillan, DNA strand break rejoining defect in xrs-6 is complemented by transfection with the human Ku80 gene. Cancer Res. 55, 1235-1238 (1995).
33. P. M. Stafford, J. L. Horton and P. R. Almond, A microdosimetric characterization of a cyclotron-produced therapeutic neutron beam. Med. Phys. 14, 1015-1019 (1987).
34. J. L. Horton, V. A. Otte, T. E. Schultheiss, P. M. Stafford, T. Sun and A. Zermeno, Physical characteristics of the M. D. Anderson Hospital clinical neutron beam. Radiother. Oncol. 13, 17-22 (1988).
35. P. J. Meechan, D. J. Haraf, A. M. Diamond and D. J. Grdina, Varying levels of radioprotection from the effects of JANUS neutrons in repair-deficient xrs-5 hamster cells treated with azacytidine. Radiat. Res. 140, 437-440 (1994).
36. +) neutrons and 4 MeV photons by exposure to cis-platinum. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 26, 837-843 (1993).
37. G. W. Barendsen and J. J. Broerse, Differences in radiosensitivity of cells from various types of experimental tumors in relation to the RBE of 15 MeV neutrons. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 3, 211-214 (1977).
38. A. Courdi, N. Brassart, J. Herault, D. Mari and P. Chauvel, The RBE of fast neutrons for in vitro inactivation of human tumour cells determined by the ratio of mean inactivation doses. Acta Oncol. 35, 237-242 (1996).
39. B. P. Kysela, J. E. Arrand and B. D. Michael, Relative contributions of levels of initial damage and repair of double-strand breaks to the ionizing radiation-sensitive phenotype of the Chinese hamster cell mutant, XR-V15B. Part II. Neutrons. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 64, 531-538 (1993).
40. H. Nagasawa, J. B. Little, W. C. Inkret, S. Carpenter, M. R. Raju, D. J. Chen and G. F. Strniste, Response of X-ray-sensitive CHO mutant cells (xrs-6c) to radiation. II. Relationship between cell survival and the induction of chromosomal damage with low doses of a particles. Radiat. Res. 126, 280-288 (1991).
41. J. C. Fox, Evidence to support the existence of efficient DNA double-strand break rejoining in a radiosensitive mutant of V79-4 following irradiation with 250 kVp X-rays or neutrons. Mutat. Res. 235, 41-47 (1990).
42. J. C. Fox and K. M. Prise, DNA lesions: linear energy transfer and radiosensitive mutants. Br. J. Radiol. 24 (Suppl.), 48-52 (1992).
43. L. H. Thompson, Evidence that mammalian cells possess homologous recombinational repair pathways. Mutat. Res. 363, 77-88 (1996).
44. K. Eguchi, T. Inada, M. Yaguchi, S. Satoh and I. Kaneko, Induction and repair of DNA lesions in cultured human melanoma cells exposed to a nitrogen-ion beam. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 52, 115-123 (1987).
45. M. Frankenberg-Schwager, Radiation-induced DNA lesions in eukaryotic cells, their repair and biological relevance. In Biological Effects and Physics of Solar and Galactic Cosmic Radiation (C. E. Swenberg, G. Horneck and E. G. Stassinopoulos, Eds.), pp. 1-31. NATO Advanced Science Institute Series A, Vol. 243, Plenum Press, New York, 1993.
46. P. J. Meechan, D. J. Haraf, A. M. Diamond and D. J. Grdina, Reversion of radiosensitivity in azacytidine-treated xrs5 cells does not result in full radioprotection by WR-1065. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 23, 999-1002 (1992).
47. C. U. Kirchgessner, C. K. Patil, J. W. Evans, C. A. Cuomo, L. M. Fried, T. Carter, M. A. Oettinger and J. M. Brown, DNA-dependent kinase (p350) as a candidate gene for the murine SCID defect. Science 267, 1178-1182 (1995).
48. C. Lücke-Huhle, Similarities between human ataxia fibroblasts and murine SCID cells: high sensitivity to γ rays and high frequency of methotrexate-induced DHFR gene amplification, but normal radiosensitivity to densely ionizing a particles. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 33, 201-210 (1994).
49. S. P. Jackson and P. A. Jeggo, DNA double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination: involvement of DNA-PK. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 412-415 (1995).
50. J. Houldsworth, D. Cohen, S. Singh and M. F. Lavin, The response of ataxia-telangiectasia lymphoblastoid cells to neutron irradiation. Radiat. Res. 125, 277-282 (1991).
51. C. A. Tobias, E. A. Blakely, P. Y. Chang, L. Lommel and R. Roots, Response of sensitive human ataxia and resistant T-1 cell lines to accelerated heavy ions. Br. J. Cancer 49 (Suppl. VI), 175-185 (1984).
52. M. C. Paterson Environmental and genetic interactions in human cancer In First International Conference on Health Effects of Energy Production (N. E. Gentner and P. Unrau, Eds.), pp. 69-87. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario, 1979.
53. J. P. Freyer, K. Jarrett, S. Carpenter and M. R. Raju, Oxygen enhancement ratio as a function of dose and cell cycle phase for radiation-resistant and sensitive CHO cells. Radiat. Res. 127, 297-307 (1991).
54. L. Yang, E. B. Douple, J. A. O'Hara, R. A. Crabtree and A. Eastman, Enhanced radiation-induced cell killing by carboplatin in cells of repair-proficient and repair-deficient cell lines. Radiat. Res. 144, 230-236 (1995).
55. M. A. Hannan, M. Paul and R. L. Phillips, Fast neutron r.b.e. for lethality and genotoxicity in a wild-type and a repair-deficient strain of yeast. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 50, 811-824 (1986).
56. M. A. Hannan and D. P. Gibson, Caffeine sensitization of cultured mammalian cells and human lymphocytes irradiated with γ rays and fast neutrons: A study of relative biological effectiveness in relation to cellular repair. Radiat. Res. 104, 94-101 (1985).