Suprathreshold measures of auditory function in the aging chinchilla

Hearing Research

Volumn 111, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 127-135

  McFadden, Sandra L ^a   Quaranta, Nicola ^b   Henderson, Donald ^a  

^a Hearing Research Laboratories   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emission; Frequency resolution; Presbycusis; Remote masking; Temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

AGING; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CHINCHILLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING; MASKING; NONHUMAN; PRESBYACUSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGING; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHINCHILLA; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PRESBYCUSIS;

EID: 0030826186     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00100-7     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arehole S., Salvi R.J., Saunders S.S., Hamernik R.P. Evoked response 'forward masking' functions in chinchillas. Hear. Res. 30:1987;23-32.
2. Arehole S., Salvi R.J., Saunders S.S., Henderson D. Evoked response 'forward masking' functions in chinchillas with temporary hearing loss. Hear. Res. 27:1987;193-205.
3. Arehole S., Salvi R.J., Saunders S.S., Gratton M.A. Evoked-response forward-masking functions in chinchillas with noise-induced permanent hearing loss. Audiology. 28:1989;92-110.
4. Bilger R.C. Intensive determinants of remote masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30:1958;817-824.
5. Bilger R.C. Remote masking in the absence of intra-aural muscles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39:1966;103-108.
6. Bilger R.C., Hirsh I.J. Masking of tones by bands of noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28:1956;623-630.
7. Boettcher F.A., Mills J.H., Swerdloff J.L., Holley B.L. Auditory evoked potentials in aged gerbils: responses elicited by noises separated by a silent gap. Hear. Res. 102:1996;167-178.
8. Bohne B.A., Gruner M.M., Harding G.W. Morphological correlates of aging in the chinchilla cochlea. Hear. Res. 48:1990;79-92.
9. Bonding P. Frequency selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss. Scand. Audiol. 8:1979;205-215.
10. Cervellera G., Quaranta A., Cassano P. Le remote masking: un test de conduction cochléaire. Audiology. 17:1978;317-323.
11. Cervellera G., Quaranta A., Amoroso C. Clinical experience with remote masking. Audiology. 19:1980;404-410.
12. Cervellera G., Quaranta A. Audiologic findings in presbycusis. J. Audiol. Res. 22:1982;161-171.
13. Clark, J.D., 1984. Biology and diseases of other rodents. In: Fox, J.G., Cohen, R.J., Loew, F.M. (Eds.), Laboratory Animal Medicine. Academic Press, New York.
14. Cudahy, E., 1982. Changes in the temporal processing of acoustic signals in hearing-impaired listeners. In: Hamernik, R., Henderson, D., Salvi, R. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Raven, New York.
15. Deatherage B.H., Davis H., Eldredge D.H. Physiological evidence of the masking of low frequencies by high. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:1957;132-137.
16. Dreschler W.A., Plomp R. Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. Part I. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1980;1608-1615.
17. Dreschler W.A., Plomp R. Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. Part II. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78:1985;1261-1270.
18. Dubno J.R., Lee F.-S., Matthews L.J., Mills J.H. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40:1997;444-452.
19. Duifhuis H. Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1973;1471-1488.
20. Elliott L.L. Backward and forward masking of probe tones of different frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34:1962;1116-1117.
21. Festen J.M., Plomp R. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:1983;652-662.
22. Fitzgibbons P.J., Wightman F.L. Temporal resolution in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;1387-1392.
23. Florentine M., Buus S., Scharf B., Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J. Speech Hear. Res. 23:1980;646-669.
24. 2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear. Res. 53:1991;185-208.
25. Giraudi-Perry D.M., Salvi R.J., Henderson D. Gap detection in hearing-impaired chinchillas. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;1387-1393.
26. Harris J.D. Monaural and binaural speech intelligibility and the stereophonic effect based upon temporal cues. Laryngoscope. 75:1965;428-446.
27. Harris D.M., Dallos P. Forward-masking of auditory nerve fibre responses. J. Neurophysiol. 42:1979;1036-1044.
28. Humes L.E., Christopherson L.C. Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: The contributions of auditory processing deficits. J. Speech Hear. Res. 34:1991;686-693.
29. Humes L.E., Roberts L. Speech recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: The contributions of audibility. J. Speech Hear. Res. 33:1990;726-735.
30. Jerger J. Audiological findings in aging. Adv. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 20:1973;115-124.
31. Jerger J., Jerger S., Oliver T., Pirozzolo F. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear. 9:1989;168-176.
32. Karlovich R.S., Osier H.A. Remote masking generated by high-frequency two-tone complexes. Audiology. 16:1977;507-521.
33. Lutman M.E. Degradations in frequency and temporal resolution with age and their impact on speech identification. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 467:1991;120-126.
34. Lutman M.E., Gatehouse S., Worthington A.G. Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold level and age. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;320-328.
35. McFadden, S.L., Campo, P., Quaranta, N., Henderson, D., 1997a. Age-related decline of auditory function in the chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger). Hear. Res. (in press).
36. McFadden S.L., Henderson D., Quaranta A. Remote masking in normal and noise-exposed chinchillas. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 2:1997;128-138.
37. McFadden S.L., Willott J.F. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons in C57BL/6J mice with and without sensorineural hearing loss: Effects of changing the azimuthal location of an unmasked pure-tone stimulus. Hear. Res. 78:1994;115-131.
38. McFadden S.L., Willott J.F. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons in C57BL/6J mice with and without sensorineural hearing loss: Effects of changing the azimuthal location of a continuous noise masker on responses to contralateral tones. Hear. Res. 78:1994;132-148.
39. Mensh B.D., Patterson M.C., Whitehead M.L., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: I. Altered susceptibility to repeated pure-tone exposures. Hear. Res. 70:1993;50-64.
40. Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R. Comparison of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80:1986;93-107.
41. Moutain D.C. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science. 210:1980;71-72.
42. Nelson D.A., Freyman R.L. Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81:1987;709-720.
43. Nelson, D.A., Turner, C.W., 1980. Decay of masking and frequency resolution in sensorineural hearing impaired listeners. In: van den Brink, G., Bilsen, F.A. (Eds.), Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies of Hearing. Delft University Press, Delft.
44. Penner M.J. Effect of masker duration and masker level on forward and backward masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1974;170-182.
45. Price G.R., Simon H.J. Perception of temporal differences in speech by 'normal-hearing' adults: Effects of age and intensity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76:1984;405-410.
46. Quaranta A., Amoroso C., Cervellera G. Remote masking in presbycusis. J. Audiol. Res. 18:1978;125-129.
47. Quaranta, A., McFadden, S.L., Henderson, D., Sallustio, V., 1997. Remote masking in noise-exposed chinchillas. Acta Oto-Laryngol. (submitted).
48. Quaranta A., Salonna I., Longo G. Subclinical changes of auditory function in the aged. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 476:1991;91-96.
49. Siegel J.H., Kim D.O. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 6:1982;245-248.
50. Sun J.C., Bohne B.A., Harding G.W. Is the older ear more susceptible to noise damage? Laryngoscope. 104:1994;1251-1258.
51. Tyler, R.S., 1986, The relationship between speech perception and psychoacoustical measurements in noise-induced hearing loss subjects. In: Salvi, R.J., Hamernik, R.P., Henderson, D., Colletti, P. (Eds.), Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Plenum, New York.
52. Tyler R.S., Summerfield A.Q., Wood E.J., Fernandes M.A. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;740-752.
53. Walton J.P., Frisina R.D., Meierhans L.R. Sensorineural hearing loss alters recovery from short-term adaptation in the C57BL/6 mouse. Hear. Res. 88:1995;19-26.
54. Willott, J.F., 1991. Aging and the Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology, and Psychophysics. Singular, San Diego, CA.
55. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging, 1988. Speech understanding and aging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 859-895.
56. Zwicker E. Different behavior of quadratic and cubic difference tones. Hear. Res. 1:1979;283-292.
57. Zwicker E., Schorn K. Psychoacoustic tuning curves in audiology. Audiology. 17:1978;120-140.
58. Zwislocki J., Pirodda E., Rubin H. On some post-stimulatory effects at the threshold of audibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31:1959;1-9.