Practical guidelines for antepartum fetal surveillance

American Family Physician

Volumn 56, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1981-1988

  Smtth Levitin, Michelle ^a   Petrikovsky, Boris ^a   Schneider, Elizabeth P ^a  

^a NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; BIOPHYSICS; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; FETUS; FETUS MONITORING; FETUS MOVEMENT; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030703717     PISSN: 0002838X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Gabbe SG. Antepartum fetal evaluation. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Anderson GD, eds. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 2d ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1991.
2. Sciscione A, Johnson TR. Update on fetal assessment. Female Patient 1994;19:75-88.
3. Moore TR, Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160(5 Pt 1):1075-80.
4. Neldam S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal wellbeing. Lancet 1980;1(8180):1222-4.
5. Petrikovsky BM, Kaplan GP. Diurnal non-stress test variations in healthy term fetuses. A call for evening appointments for fetal testing. Early Hum Dev 1996;44:127-30.
6. Petrikovsky BM, Kaplan G. Assessment of fetal behavior. Female Patient 1992;17:32-4.
7. Petrikovsky BM, Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ. Heart rate cyclicity during labor in healthy term fetuses. Am J Pernatol 1989;6:289-91.
8. Petrikovsky BM, Vintzileos AM, Lerer T. Fetal heart rate cyclicity during preterm labor. J Reprod Med 1990;35:152-4.
9. Devoe L, Boehm F, Paul R, Frigoletto F, Penso C, Goldenberg R, et al. Clinical experience with the Hewlett-Packard M-1350A fetal monitor: correlation of Doppler-detected fetal body movements with fetal heart rate parameters and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:650-5.
10. Stance LM, Rabello Y, Medearis AL, Paul RH. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests? Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:999-1003.
11. Phelan JP. Antepartum fetal assessment - newer techniques. Semin Perinatol 1988;12:57-65.
12. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:787-95.
13. Manning FA. Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995;38:26-44.
14. Vintzileos AM, Gaffney SE, Salinger LM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:196-201.
15. Schneider EP, Hutson JM, Petrie RH. An assessment of the first decade's experience with antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Am J Perinatol 1988;5:134-41.
16. Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:771-7.
17. Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, Lange IR, Menticoglou S. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157(4 Pt 1):880-4.
18. Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Contraction stress test versus non-stress test for primary surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:778-81.
19. Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:812-7.
20. Petrikovsky BM, Schifrin B, Diana L. The effect of fetal acoustic stimulation on fetal swallowing and amniotic fluid index. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:548-50.
21. Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:131-4.
22. Ohel G, Horowitz E, Linder N, Sohmer H. Neonatal auditory acuity following in utero vibratory acoustic stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:440-1.
23. Nyman M, Barr M, Westgren M. A four-year follow-up of hearing and development in children exposed in utero to vibro-acoustic stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1992;99:685-8.
24. Boehm FH, Salyer S, Shah DM, Vaughn WK. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:566-8.