Effects of cryopreserved semen quality and timed intrauterine insemination on pregnancy rate and gender of offspring in a donor insemination program

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 531-537

  Sidhu, R S ^a   Sharma, R K ^a   Agarwal, A ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial insemination; Computer assisted semen analysis; Donor sperm; Pregnancy; Semen characteristics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CRYOPRESERVATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LIPID PEROXIDATION; MALE FERTILITY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPERM PRESERVATION; THAWING;

EID: 0030664885     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021131511209     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gerber WL, Bresaw LS: Semen abnormalities in artificial insemination donor candidates. J Urol 1983; 130:266-268
2. Nachtigall RD: Donor insemination and human immunodeficiency virus: A risk/benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1692-1696
3. Schover LR, Thomas AJ, Miller KF, Falcone T, Goldberg J: Preferences for intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus donor insemination in severe male factor infertility: A preliminary report. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2461-2464
4. Vogt PH: Genetic aspects of artificial fertilization. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:128-137
5. Carson SA: Sex selection: The ultimate in family planning. Fertil Steril 1988;50:16-19
6. Zarutskie PW, Muller CH, Magone M, Soules MR: The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques. Fertil Steril 1989;52:891-905
7. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD: Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation-effects on the probability of conception, survival of pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N. Engl J Med 1995;333:1517-1521
8. Gray RH: Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:1982-1994
9. Perez A, Eger R, Domenichini V, Kambic R, Gray RH: Sex ratio associated with natural family planning. Fertil Steril 1985;43:152-153
10. Ericsson RJ: Sex selection via albumin columns: 20 years of results. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1787-1788
11. New guidelines for the use of semen donor insemination: 1986. The American Fertility Society. Fertil Sertil 1986;46:93S-101S
12. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993
13. Sharma RK, Tolentino MV, Agarwal A: Sperm kinematics of cryopreserved normozoospermic specimens after artificial stimulation. Urology 1996;47:77-81
14. Milligan MP, Harris S, Dennis KJ: Comparison of sperm velocity in fertile and infertile groups as measured by time lapse photography. Fertil Steril 1980:34:509-511
15. Kjaergaard N, Mortensen BB, Hostrup P, Lauritsen JG: Prognostic value of semen analysis in infertility evaluation (male fertility/life-table analysis). Andrologia 1990;22:62-68
16. Bordson BL, Ricci E, Dickey RP, Dunaway H, Taylor SN, Curole DN: Comparison of fecundability with fresh and frozen semen in therapeutic donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1986;46:466-469
17. Brown CA, Boone WR, Shapiro SS: Improved cryopreserved semen fecundability in an alternating fresh-frozen artificial insemination program. Fertil Steril 1988;50:825-827
18. Richter MA, Haning RV, Jr, Saphiro SS: Artificial donor insemination: Fresh versus frozen sperm, the patient as her own control. Fertil Steril 1984;41:277-280
19. Hammond MG, Jordan S, Sloan CS: Factors affecting pregnancy rates in a donor insemination program using frozen semen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:480-485
20. DiMarzo SJ, Huang J, Kennedy JF, Villanueva B, Herbert SA, Young PE: Pregnancy rates with fresh versus computer-controlled cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor in a private practice setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1483-1490
21. Patton PE, Burry KA, Thurmond A, Novy MJ, Wolf DP: Intrautérine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen. Fertil Steril 1992;57:559-564
22. Pistorius LR, Kruger TF, Villers A De, Merwe JP: A comparative study using prepared and unprepared frozen semen for donor insemination. Arch Androl 1996;36:81-86
23. Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Carr B, Edman C, Odom J, Ackerman G: A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm. Fertil Steril 1990;53:521-527
24. David G, Czglick F, Mayaux MJ, Schwarz D: The success of AID and semen characteristics study on 1489 cycles and 192 ejaculates. Int J Androl 1980:3:613-619
25. Marshburn PB, Mclntire D, Carr BR, Byrd W: Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1992;58:179-186
26. Dodson WC, Haney AF: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:457-467
27. Smith KD, Rodriguez-Rigau LJ, Steinberger E: The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen. Fertil Steril 1981;36:496-502
28. Centola GM: Effect of cryopreservation on human sperm motility. Mol. Androl 1989; 1:399-402
29. Matorras R, Gorostiaga A, Diez J, Corcostegui B, Pijoan JI, Ramon O, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ: Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation. Fertil Steril 1996;65:620-625
30. Steinberger E, Smith KD: Artificial insemination with fresh or frozen semen: a comparative study. JAMA 1973;223:776-783
31. Chung PK, Verkauf BS, Mola R, Skinner L, Eichberg RD, Maroulis GB: Correlation between semen parameters of electroejaculates and achieving pregnancy by intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997;7:129-132
32. Shelden R, Kemmann E, Bohrer M, Pasquale S: Multiple gestation is associated with the use of high numbers in the intrauterine insemination specimen in women undergoing gonadotropin stimulation. Fertil Steril 1988;49:607-610
33. Byrd W, Drobnis E, Kutteh WH, Marshburn P, Carr BR: Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm: a prospective randomized trial comparing three different sperm preparation techniques. Fertil Steril 1994;62:850-856
34. Kang BM, Wu T-CJ: Effect of age on intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:93-98
35. Hurd WW, Randolph JF, Ansbacher R, Menge AC, Ohl DA, Brown AN: Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1993:59:339-342
36. Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Rye PH: Male birth rates are influenced by the insemination of unselected spermatozoa and not by clomiphine citrate. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:761-762
37. Simpson JL: Pregnancy and timing of intercourse. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1563-1565
38. France JT, Graham FM, Gosling L, Hair P, Knox BS: Characteristics of natural conceptual cycles occurring in a prospective study of sex preselection: fertility awareness symptoms, hormone levels, sperm survival and pregnancy outcome. Int J Fertil 1992;37:244-255
39. Shushan A, Schenker JG: Prenatal sex determination and selection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1545-1549
40. Reubinoff BE, Schenker JG: New advances in sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1996;66:343-350