A field experiment examining the effects of membership in voting majority and minority subgroups and the ameliorating effects of postdecisional voice

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 806-812

  Hunton, James E ^b   Price, Kenneth H ^a   Hall, Thomas W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Texas ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030373569     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.806     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ackerman, P. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3-27.
2. Azzi, A. (1992). Procedural justice in the allocation of power in intergroup relations: Studies in the United States and South Africa. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 736-747.
3. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
4. Bobko, P. (1986). A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 323-326.
5. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. (in press). An integrative frame-work for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin.
6. Castore, C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1978). Determinants of support for group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 75-92.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12, 258-274.
9. Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1148-1160.
10. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.
11. Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 55-61.
12. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
13. Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
15. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
16. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
17. Miller, C. E., Jackson, P., Mueller, J., & Schersching, S. (1987). Some social psychological effects of group rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 325-332.
18. Price, K. H., Hunton, J. E., Clinton, B. D., & Hall, T. W. (1995, August). Differential reactions of majority/minority sub-group members and individuals to variations in the instrumentality of voice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
19. Sheppard, B. H. (1983). Managers as inquisitors: Some lessons from the law. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 193-213). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.