Do We Know How Much People Like One Another?

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 928-936

  Kenny, David A ^a   Mohr, Cynthia D ^a   Bond Jr , Charles F ^b   Horn, Elizabeth M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030279253     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.928     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
2. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
3. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., & Sailer, L. (1982). Informant accuracy in social network data V: An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Science Research, 11, 30-66.
4. Berry, D. S., & Wero, J. L. F. (1993). Accuracy in face perception: A view from ecological psychology. Journal of Personality, 61, 497-520.
5. Bond, C. F., Horn, E. M., & Kenny, D. A. (in press). A model fortriadic relations. Psychological Methods.
6. Bond, C. F., & Kenny, D. A. (1996). TRIAD: A FORTRAN computer program for triadic analysis. Unpublished computer program, Texas Christian University.
7. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Consensus and self-other agreement for trait inferences from minimal information. Journal of Personality, 61, 477-496.
8. Chapdelaine, A., Kenny, D. A., & LaFontana, K. M. (1994). Matchmaker, matchmaker, can you make me a match? Predicting liking between two unacquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 83-91.
9. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
10. Curry, T. J., & Emerson, R. M. (1970). Balance theory: A theory of interpersonal attraction? Sociometry, 33, 216-238.
11. Dawes, R. M. (1989). Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-17.
12. Frey, K. P., & Smith, E. R. (1993). Beyond the actor's traits: Forming impressions of actors, targets, and relationships from social behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 486-493.
13. Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
14. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgments: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
15. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
16. Harvey, J. H., Town, J. P., & Yarkin, K. L. (1981). How fundamental is the "fundamental attribution error"? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 346-349.
17. Hastie, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). The concept of accuracy in social judgment. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 193-208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
19. Hoch, S. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221-234.
20. Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1978). An omnibus test for social structure using triads. Sociological Methods & Research, 7, 227-256.
21. Insko, C. A. (1984). Balance theory, the Jordan paradigm, and the Wiest tetrahedron. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 89-140). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Macmillan.
23. Jussim, L. J., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 281-388). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
25. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-241). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
26. Kenny, D. A. (1990). What makes a relationship special? In T. W. Draper & A. C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use(pp. 161-178). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Kenny, D. A. (1995). SOREMO. Unpublished computer program and documentation, University of Connecticut.
29. Kenny, D. A., & Albright, L. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390-402.
30. Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them?: An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145-161.
31. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1982). Reciprocity of attraction: A confirmed hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 54-58.
32. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142-182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
33. Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9, 109-134.
34. Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and a method of research. New York: Springer.
35. Lee, Y.-T., Jussim, L. J., & McCauley, C. R. (1995). Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Levesque, M. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178-1187.
37. McArthur, L. A. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171-193.
38. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
39. Mohazab, F., & Feger, H. (1985). An extension of Heiderian balance theory for quantified data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 147-165.
40. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
41. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
42. Rapoport, A. (1963). Mathematical models of social interaction. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 493-579). New York: Wiley.
43. Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457-477.
44. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
45. Wiest, W. M. (1965). A quantitative extension of Heider's theory of cognitive balance applied to interpersonal perception and self-esteem. Psychological Monographs, 79(14, Whole No. 607).
46. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Cognitive theories in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 320-411). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.