Suppression of motion-produced smear during smooth pursuit eye movements

Current Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 1032-1034

  Bedell, Harold E ^a   Lott, Lori A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030221429     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00650-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. von Holst E, Mittelstadt H: The principle of reafference: interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. In Perceptual Processing: Stimulus Equivalence and Pattern Recognition. Edited by Dodwell PC. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1971:41-71.
2. Grüsser O-J: Interaction between efferent and afferent signals in visual perception: a history of ideas and experimental paradigms. Acta Psychol 1986, 63:3-21.
3. Bridgeman B, Stark L: Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction. Vision Res 1991, 31:1903-1913.
4. Gauthier GM, Nommay D, Vercher J-L: The role of ocular muscle proprioception in visual localization of targets. Science 1990, 249:58-61.
5. McDougall W: The sensations excited by a single momentary stimulation of the eye. Brit J Psychol 1904, 1:78-113.
6. Chen S, Bedell H E, Ögmen H: A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets. Vision Res 1995, 35:2315-2328.
7. Hogben JH, DiLollo V: Suppression of visible persistence in apparent motion. Percept Psychophys 1985, 38:450-460.
8. Starr A, Angel R, Yeates H: Visual suppression during smooth following and saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 1969, 9:195-197.
9. Khurana B, Kowler E: Shared attentional control of smooth eye movement and perception. Vision Res 1987, 27:1603-1618.
10. Burr D: Motion smear. Nature 1980, 284:164-165.
11. Di Lollo V, Hogben JH: Suppression of visible persistence. J Exp Psychol [Hum. Percept] 1985, 11:304-316.
12. Castet E: Effect of the ISI on the visible persistence of a stimulus in apparent motion. Vision Res 1994, 34:2103-2114.
13. Matin E: Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psych Bull 1974, 81:899-917.
14. Volkmann FC: Human visual suppression. Vision Res 1986, 26:1401-1416.
15. Whiteside TCD, Graybiel A, Niven JI: Visual illusions of movement. Brain 1965, 88:193-210.
16. Post RB, Leibowitz HW: A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception. Perception 1985, 14:631-643.
17. Bedell HE, Klopfenstein JF, Yuan N: Extraretinal information about eye position during involuntary eye movement: optokinetic afternystagmus. Percept Psychophys 1989, 46:579-586.
18. Leigh RJ, Dell'Osso LF, Yaniglos SS, Thurston SE: Oscillopsia, retinal image stabilization and congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988, 29:279-282.
19. Goldstein HP, Gottlob I, Fendick MG: Visual remapping in infantile nystagmus. Vision Res 1992, 32:1115-1124.
20. Bedell HE, Currie DC: Extraretinal signals for congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993, 34:2325-2332.
21. Bedell HE, Bollenbacher MA: Perception of motion smear in normal observers and in persons with congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996, 37:188-195.
22. Groner R, Groner MT, Müller P, Bischof WF, Di Lollo V: On the confounding effects of phosphor persistence in oscilloscope displays. Vision Res 1993, 33:913-917.
23. Young LR, Sheena D: Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behav Res Meth Instrum 1975, 7:397-429.