Perception of motion smear in normal observers and in persons with congenital nystagmus

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 188-195

  Bedell, Harold E ^a   Bollenbacher, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

congenital nystagmus; contrast sensitivity; motion smear; visual masking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONGENITAL NYSTAGMUS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL MASKING;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; NYSTAGMUS, PATHOLOGIC; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0030027517     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Leigh RJ, Dell'Osso LF, Yaniglos SS, Thurston SE. Oscillopsia, retinal image stabilization and congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:279-282.
2. Goldstein HP, Gottlob I, Fendick MG. Visual remapping in infantile nystagmus. Vision Res. 1992;32:1115-1124.
3. Bedell HE, Currie DC. Extraretinal signals for congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2325-2332.
4. Dell'Osso LF, Leigh RJ. Ocular motor stability of foveation periods: Required conditions for suppression of oscillopsia. Neuro-ophthalmol. 1992;12:303-326.
5. Dell'Osso LF, Leigh RJ. Foveation period stability and oscillopsia suppression in congenital nystagmus. An hypothesis. Neuro-ophthalmol. 1992;12:169-183.
6. Abel LA, Willaims IW, Levi L. Intermittent oscillopsia in a case of congenital nystagmus: Dependence upon waveform. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:3104-3108.
7. Dell'Osso LF, Daroff RB. Congenital nystagmus waveforms and foveation strategy. Doc Ophthalmol. 1975;39:155-182.
8. McDougall W. The sensations excited by a single momentary stimulation of the eye. Br J Psychol. 1904;1:78-113.
9. Matin E, Clymer AB, Matin L. Metacontrast and saccadic suppression. Science. 1972;178:179-181.
10. Burr D. Motion smear. Nature. 1980; 284:164-165.
11. Chen S, Bedell HE, Ögmen H. A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets. Vision Res. 1995;35:2315-2328.
12. Smith WM, Gulick WL. Visual contour and movement perception. Science. 1956;124:316-317.
13. Smith WM, Gulick WL. Dynamic contour perception. J Exp Psychol. 1957;53:145-152.
14. Kaufman L, Cyrulnik I, Kaplowitz J, Melnick G, Stoff D. The complementarity of apparent and real motion. Psychol Forsch. 1971;34:343-348.
15. Wheeless LL, Cohen GH, Boynton RM. Luminance as a parameter of the eye movement control system. J Opt Soc Am. 1967;57:394-400.
16. Currie DC, Bedell HE, Song S. Visual acuity for optotypes with image motions simulating congenital nystagmus. Clin Vision Sci. 1993;8:73-84.
17. Young LR, Sheena D. Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behav Res Methods Instrum. 1975; 7:397-429.
18. van den Brink G, Bouman MA. Visual contrast thresholds for moving point sources. J Opt Soc Am. 1957;47:612-618.
19. Burr DC. Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981;211:321-339.
20. Abadi RV, Worfolk R. Retinal slip velocities in congenital nystagmus. Vision Res. 1989;29:195-205.
21. Skavenski A. Eye movement and visual localization of objects in space. In: Kowler E, ed. Eye Movements and Their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes. New York: Elsevier; 1990:263-287.