Variation of the interfacial shear strength and adhesion of a nanometer-sized contact

Langmuir

Volumn 12, Issue 13, 1996, Pages 3334-3340

  Carpick, R W ^a,b   Agrait N ^a,c   Ogletree, D F ^a   Salmeron, M ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; FRICTION; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MICA; SHEAR STRENGTH;

INTERFACIAL ADHESION ENERGY; NANOMETER SIZED CONTACT;

SURFACE PHENOMENA;

EID: 0030156294     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la9509007     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Johnson, K. L.; Kendall, K.; Roberts, A. D. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1971, 324, 301.
2. Dowson, D. History of Tribology; Longman: London, 1979.
3. Tabor, D.; Winterton, R. H. S. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1969, 372, 435.
4. Israelachvili, J. N.; McGuiggan, P. M.; Homola, A. M. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1972, 337, 19.
5. Israelachvili, J. N.; McGuiggan, P. M.; Homola, A. M. Science 1988, 240, 189.
6. Israelachvili, J. N.; McGuiggan, P. M.; Gee, M. L. Wear 1990, 136, 65.
7. Krim, J.; Watts, E. T.; Digel, J. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 1990, 8, 3417.
8. Watts, E. T.; Krim, J.; Widom, A. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 3466.
9. Krim, J.; Solina, D. H.; Chiarello, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 181.
10. Mate, C. M.; McClelland, G. M.; Erlandsson, R.; Chiang, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 59, 1942.
11. Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; Gerber, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 930.
12. Dai, Q.; Vollmer, R.; Carpick, R. W.; Ogletree, D. F.; Salmeron, M. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1995, 66, 5266.
13. Carpick, R. W.; Ogletree, D. F.; Salmeron, M. Rev. Sci. Instrum., submitted.
14. Sheiko, S. S.; Möller, M.; Reuvekamp, E. M. C. M.; Zandbergen, H. W. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 48, 5675.
15. Carpick, R. W.; Agraït, N.; Ogletree, D. F.; Salmeron, M. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 1996, 14, 1289.
16. Israelachvili, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed.; Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 1992.
17. Johnson, K. L. Contact Mechanics; University Press: Cambridge, 1987.
18. Hertz, H. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1881, 92, 156.
19. Israelachvili, J. N. In Fundamentals of Friction; Singer, I. L., Pollock, H. M., Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1992; p 351.
20. Maugis, D.; Barquins, M. J. Phy. D: Appl. Phys. 1983, 16, 1843.
21. Maugis, D. Langmuir 1995, 11, 679.
22. Homola, A. M.; Israelachvili, J. N.; Gee, M. L.; McGuiggan, P. M. J. Tribol. 1989, 111, 675.
23. Nanoprobe, Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA.
24. Hu, J.; Xiao, X.-D.; Ogletree, D. F.; Salmeron, M. Surf. Sci. 1995, 327, 358.
25. Timoshenko, S. P.; Goodier, J. N. Theory of Elasticity; McGraw Hill: New York, 1987.
26. Sader, J. E. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1995, 66, 4583.
27. Sader, J. E.; Larson, I.; Mujvaney, P.; White, L. R. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1995, 66, 3789.
28. Savkoor, A. R. In Fundamentals of Friction; Singer, I. L., Pollock, H. M., Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1992; p 111.
29. Carpick, R. W.; Agraït, N.; Ogletree, D. F.; Salmeron, M. In progress.
30. Derjaguin, B. V.; Muller, V. M.; Toporov, Y. P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1975, 53, 314.
31. Johnson, K. L. Langmuir, in press.
32. Maugis, D. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1992, 150, 243.
33. Müller, V. M.; Yushenko, V. S.; Derjaguin, B. V. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 77, 91.
34. Pollock, H. M. In Fundamentals of Friction; Singer, I. L., Pollock, H. M., Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1992; p 77.
35. Pethica, J. B.; Sutton, A. P. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 1988, 6, 2494.
36. McNeil, L. E.; Grimsditch, M. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1992, 5, 1681.
37. Metals Handbook, 10th ed.; American Society for Metals: Metals Park, OH, 1990.
38. Since the decrease of γ and τ occurs during scanning, fitting each of the friction-load curves to the JKR equation is not strictly correct, since fixed values of γ and τ assumed for such a fit. However, the changes in these values were sufficiently small so that ignoring them for an individual fit introduces a negligible error. In fact, adapting the JKR equation to take such changes into account has a negligible effect (Johnson, K. L. Personal communication).
39. Garfunkel, E. L.; Somorjai, G. A. Surf. Sci. 1982, 115, 441.
40. Sokoloff, J. B. Wear 1993, 167, 59.
41. McGuiggan, P. M.; Israelachvili, J. N. J. Mater. Res. 1990, 5, 2232.
42. Hirano, M.; Shinjo, K.; Kaneko, R.; Murata, Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 2642.
43. However, the presence of adhesion and friction anisotropy depended upon the experimental environment. Adhesion anisotropy occurred in humid air (33% RH) but not in dry nitrogen. Friction anisotropy occurred in dry air at higher temperature (130°C) but not in ambient air.
44. Sutcliffe, M. J.; Taylor, S. R.; Cameron, A. Wear 1978, 57, 181.
45. McLelland, G. M. Adhesion and Friction; Springer Series in Surface Science; Springer: New York, 1989; Vol. 17.
46. Homola, A. M.; Israelachvili, J. N.; McGuiggan, P. M.; Gee, M. L. Wear 1990, 136, 65.
47. Yoshizawa, H.; Chen, Y.-L.; Israelachvili, J. Wear 1993, 768, 161.