The Oregon Priority-setting Exercise: Cost-Effectiveness and the Rule of Rescue, Revisited

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 117-119

  Hadorn, David ^a  

^a MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; NOTE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; OREGON; STATE HEALTH PLANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030118470     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600203     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Fox DM, Leichter HM Rationing care in Oregon: the new accountability Health Aff. 1991 (Summer): 7-27.
2. Hadorn DC The problem of discrimination in health care priority setting JAMA. 1992; 268: 1454-9.
3. Tengs TO, Meyer G., Siegel JE, Pliskin JS, Graham JD, Weinstein MC Oregon’s Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship? Med Decis Making. 1996; 16: 99-107.
4. Ubel PA, Lowenstein G., Scanlon D., Kamlet M. Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: a partial explanation of why Oregon’s cost-effectiveness list failed Med Decis Making. 1996; 16: 108-116.
5. Hadorn DC Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue JAMA. 1991; 265: 2218-25.
6. Hasnain R., Garland M. Health Care in Common: Report of the Oregon Health Decisions Community Meetings Process Portland, OR: Oregon Health Decisions, 1990.
7. Freemantle N., Maynard A. Something rotten in the state of clinical and economic evaluations? [editorial] Health Econ. 1994; 3: 63-67.
8. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds). Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine New York: Oxford University Press, in press.
9. Hadorn DC, Uebersax J. Large-scale outcome evaluation: how should quality of life be measured? I: Calibration a brief questionnaire and a search for preference subgroups J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 607-18.
10. Hall MA, Anderson GF Health insurers’ assessment of medical necessity U Penn Law Rev. 1992; 140: 1637-712.