Oregon's medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: Is there any relationship?

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 99-107

  Tengs, Tammy O ^a   Meyer, Gregg ^b   Siegel, Joanna E ^b   Pliskin, Joseph S ^b   Graham, John D ^b   Weinstein, Milton C ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

cost effectiveness; Medicaid; Oregon; rationing; resource allocation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAID; UNITED STATES;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; MEDICAID; OREGON; STATE HEALTH PLANS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029923265     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600201     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Oregon Office of Medical Assistance Programs, Department of Human Resources. Waiver Application: Oregon Demonstration Project August 1991.
2. Eddy DM. Cost-effectiveness analysis: a conversation with my father. JAMA. 1992;267:1669-75.
3. Eddy DM. Oregon's plan: should it be approved? JAMA. 1991;266:2439-45.
4. Daniels N. Is the Oregon rationing plan fair? JAMA. 1991;265:2232-5.
5. Hadorn D. Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. JAMA. 1991;265:2218-25.
6. Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment. Evaluation of the Oregon Medicaid Proposal. OTA-H-532. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, May 1992.
7. Oregon Health Services Commission. Ordering of the October 30, 1992, Prioritized Health Services List, 1992.
8. Power E, Hewitt M, Eden J, Opher D. Brief analysis of Medicaid Waiver Resubmission, Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment, December 23, 1992.
9. Oregon Health Services Commission. Ordering of the April 19, 1993, Prioritized Health Services List, 1993.
10. Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS, et al. Five hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal. 1995;15:369-90.
11. Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology, 1992.
12. International Classification of Diseases. Los Angeles, CA: Practice Management Information Corporation, 1993.
13. Bishop YM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1975.
14. Pennock JL, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Jamieson SW, Bieber CP. Cardiac transplantation in perspective for the future: survival, complications, rehabilitation, and cost. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;63:168-77.
15. 3: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1991;4:521-31.
16. Williams A. Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. Br Med J. 1985;291:326-9.
17. Kuppermann M, Luce BR, McGovern B, Podrid PJ, Bigger JT, Ruskin JM. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the implantable defibrillator. Circulation. 1990;81:91-100.
18. Taylor WC, Pass TM, Shepard DS, Komaroff AL. Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol reduction for the primary prevention of heart disease in men. In: Preventing Disease: Beyond the Rhetoric. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
19. Gable CB, Holzer SS, Engelhart L, et al. Pneumococcal vaccine: efficacy and associated cost savings. JAMA. 1990;264:2910-5.
20. Bloom BS, Hillman AL, Fendrick AM, Schwartz JS. A reappraisal of hepatitis B virus vaccination strategies using cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:298-306.
21. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination. Washington, DC, December 1981.
22. Eddy DM. Screening for cervical cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:214-26.
23. van der Mass PJ, de Konig JG, van Ineveld BM, et al. The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 1989;43:1055-60.
24. McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:1397-401.