Chemical denaturation and modification of ovalbumin alters its dependence on ubiquitin conjugation for class I antigen presentation

Journal of Immunology

Volumn 157, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 617-624

  Michalek, Michael T ^a   Grant, Ethan P ^b   Rock, Kenneth L ^b,c  

^a Alpha Beta Technology Inc   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ENZYME INHIBITOR; LYSINE; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 1; OVALBUMIN; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; CHINESE HAMSTER; CONJUGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSOL; METHYLATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE MUTANT; TUMOR CELL LINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; CELL LINE; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS CLASS I; METHYLATION; MICE; MICROINJECTIONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OVALBUMIN; PROTEIN DENATURATION; TEMPERATURE; UBIQUITINS;

EID: 0029987724     PISSN: 00221767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. York, I., and Rock K. L. 1996. Presentation of antigens on MHC class I molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:369.
2. Townsend, A., and J. Trowsdale. 1993. The transporters associated with antigen presentation. Semin. Cell Biol. 4:53.
3. Goldberg, A. L., and K. L. Rock. 1992. Proteolysis, proteasomes and antigen presentation. Nature 357:375.
4. Monaco, J. J. 1992. A molecular model of MHC class I-restricted antigen processing. Immunol. Today 13:173.
5. Rock, K. L., C. Gramm, L. Rothstein, K. Clarke, R. Stein, L. Dick, D. Hwang, and A. L. Goldberg. 1994. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC-class I molecules. Cell 75:761.
6. Yang, Y., J. B. Waters, K. Früh, and P. A. Peterson. 1992. Proteasomes are regulated by interferon γ: implications for antigen processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:4928.
7. Van Kaer, L., P. G. Ashton-Rickardt, M. Eichelberger, M. Gaczynska, K. Nagashima, K. L. Rock, A. L. Goldberg, P. C. Doherty, and S. Tonegawa. 1994. Altered peptidase and viral-specific T cell response in LMP2 mutant mice. Immunity 1:533.
8. Fehling, H. J., W. Swat, C. Laplace, R. Kuhn, K. Rajewsky, U. Muller, and H. v. Boehmer. 1994. MHC class I expression in mice lacking the proteasome subunit LMP-7. Science 265:1234.
9. Arnold, D., J. Driscoll, M. Androlewicz, E. Hughes, J. Driscoll, and T. Spies. 1992. Proteasome subunits encoded in the MHC are not generally required for the processing of peptides bound by MHC class I molecules. Nature 360:171.
10. Momburg, F., V. Ortiz-Navarrete, J. Neefjes, E. Goulmy, Y. van de Wal, H. Spits, S. J. Powis, G. W. Butcher, J. C. Howard, P. Walden, and G. Hammerling. 1992. Proteasome subunits encoded by the major histocompatibility complex are not essential for antigen presentation. Nature 360:174.
11. Yewdell, J., C. Lapham, I. Bacik, T. Spies, and J. Bennink. 1994. MHC-encoded proteasome subunits LMP2 and LMP7 are not required for efficient antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 152:1163.
12. d in proteasome subunit LMP2 and LMP7 deficient cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1863.
13. Gaczynska, M., K. L. Rock, and A. L. Goldberg. 1993. γ-Interferon and expression of MHC genes regulate peptide hydrolysis by proteasomes. Nature 365:264.
14. Gaczynska, M., K. L. Rock, T. Spies, and A. L. Goldberg. 1994. Peptidase activities of proteasomes are differentially regulated by the major histocompatibility complex-encoded genes for LMP2 and LMP7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 9213.
15. Driscoll, J., M. G. Brown, D. Finley, and J. J. Monaco. 1993. MHC-linked Lmp gene products specifically alter peptidase activities of the proteasome. Nature 365:262.
16. Orlowski, M. 1990. The multicatalytic proteinase complex, a major extralysosomal proteolytic system. Biochemistry 29:10289.
17. Rivett, A. 1993. Proteasomes: multicatalytic proteinase complexes. Biochem. J. 291:1.
18. Goldberg, A. L. 1992. The mechanism and functions of ATP-dependent proteases in bacterial and animal cells. Eur. J. Biochem. 203:9.
19. Ciechanover, A., and A. L. Schwartz. 1994. The ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway: mechanisms of recognition of the proteolytic substrate and involvement in the degradation of native cellular proteins. FASEB J. 8:182.
20. Rechsteiner, M., L. Hoffman, and W. Dubiel. 1993. The multicatalytic and 26S proteases. J. Biol. Chem. 268:6065.
21. Murakami, Y., S. Matsufuji, T. Kameji, S. Hayashi, K. Igarashi, T. Tamura, K. Tanaka, and A. Ichihara. 1992. Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. Nature 360:597.
22. Tokunaga, F., T. Goto, T. Koide, Y. Murakami, S. Hayashi, T. Tamura, K. Tanaka, and A. Ichihara. 1994. ATP- and antizyme-dependent endoproteolysis of ornithine decarboxylase to oligopeptides by the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 269:17382.
23. Rosenberg-Hasson, Y., Z. Bercovich, A. Ciechanover, and C. Kahana. 1989. Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase in mammalian cells is ATP dependent but ubiquitin independent. Eur. J. Biochem. 185:469.
24. Bercovich, Z., and C. Kahana. 1993. Involvment of the 20S proteasome in the degradation of ornithine decarboxylase. Eur. J. Biochem. 213:205.
25. Driscoll, J., and A. L. Goldberg. 1990. The proteasome (multicatalytic protease) is a component of the 1500-kDa proteolytic complex which degrades ubiquitin-conjugated proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 265:4789.
26. Dick, L. R., C. Aldrich, S. C. Jameson, C. R. Moomaw, B. C. Pramanik, C. K. Doyle, G. N. DeMartino, M. J. Bevan, J. M. Forman, and C. A. Slaughter. 1994. Proteolytic processing of ovalbumin and β-galactosidase by the proteasome to yield antigenic peptides. J. Immunol. 152:3884.
27. Michalek, M. T., E. P. Grant, C. Gramm, A. L. Goldberg, and K. L. Rock. 1993. A role for the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway in MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation. Nature 363:552.
28. Grant, E. P., M. T. Michalek, A. L. Goldberg, and K. L. Rock. 1995. Rate of antigen degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway influences MHC class I presentation. J. Immunol. 155:3750.
29. 1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme in temperature-sensitive cell lines. J. Immunol. 154:511.
30. Michalek, M. T., B. Benacerraf, and K. L. Rock. 1991. Weak base amines can inhibit class I MHC-restricted antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 146:449.
31. Jentoft, N., and D. G. Dearborn. 1979. Labeling of proteins by reductive methylation using sodium cyanoborohydride. J. Biol. Chem. 254:4359.
32. Bohlen, P., S. Stein, W. Dairman, and S. Udenfriend. 1973. Fluorometric assay of proteins in the nanogram range. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 155:213.
33. Peterson, G. L. 1977. A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable. Anal. Biochem. 83:346.
34. Rock, K. L., L. Rothstein, and S. Gamble. 1990. Generation of class 1 MHC-restricted T-T hybridomas. J. Immunol. 145:804.
35. Finley, D., A. Ciechanover, and A. Varshavsky. 1984. Thermolability of ubiquitin-activating enzyme from the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85. Cell 37:43.
36. Ciechanover, A., D. Finley, and A. Varshavsky. 1984. Ubiquitin dependence of selective protein degradation demonstrated in the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85. Cell 37:57.
37. Moore, M. W., F. R. Carbone, and M. J. Bevan. 1988. Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation. Cell 54:777.
38. Cerundolo, V., A. Kelly, T. Elliott, J. Trowsdale, and A. Townsend. 1995. Genes encoded in the major histocompatibility complex affecting the generation of peptides for TAP transport. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:554.
39. Boon, T., and A. Van Pel. 1989. T cell-recognized antigenic peptides derived from the cellular genome are not protein degradation products but can be generated directly by transcription and translation of short subgenic regions: a hypothesis. Immunogenetics 29:75.
40. Tanaka, K., L. Waxman, and A. L. Goldberg. 1983. ATP serves two distinct roles in protein degradation in reticulocytes, one requiring and one independent of ubiquitin. J. Cell Biol. 96:1580.
41. Carbone, F. R., N. A. Hosken, M. W. Moore, and M. J. Bevan. 1989. Class I MHC-restricted cytotoxic responses to soluble protein antigen. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 54:551.
42. Hershko, A., and A. Ciechanover. 1992. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:761.
43. Reichsteiner, M. 1987. Ubiquitin-mediated pathways for intracellular proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 3:1.
44. Kulka, R. G., B. Raboy, R. Schuster, H. A. Parag, G. Diamond, A. Ciechanover, and M. Marcus. 1988. A Chinese hamster cell cycle mutant arrested at G2 phase has a temperature-sensitive ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1. J. Biol. Chem. 263: 15726.
45. Gropper, R., R. Brandt, S. Elias, C. Bearer, A. Mayer, A. Schwartz, and A. Ciechanover. 1991. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1, is required for stress-induced lysosomal degradation of cellular proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 3602.
46. Shastri, N., G. Gammon, S. Horvath, A. Miller, and E. E. Sercarz. 1986. The choice between two distinct T cell determinants within a 23-amino acid region of lysozyme depends on their structural context. J. Immunol. 137:911.
47. Shastri, N., A. Miller, and E. E. Sercarz. 1984. The expressed T cell repertoire is heirarchical: the precise focus of lysozyme-specific T cell clones is dependent upon the structure of the immunogen. J. Mol. Cell. Immunol. 1:369.
48. Buchmuller, Y., and G. Corradin. 1982. Lymphocyte specificity to protein antigens. V. Conformational dependence of activation of cytochrome c-specific T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 12:412.
49. Vidard, L., K. L. Rock, and B. Benacerraf. 1992. Diversity in MHC class II ovalbumin T cell epitopes generated by distinct proteases. J. Immunol. 149:498.
50. Chin, D. T., L. Kuehl, and M. Rechsteiner. 1982. Conjugation of ubiquitin to denatured hemoglobin is proportional to the rate of hemoglobin degradation in HeLa cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:5857.
51. Hershko, A., E. Eytan, A. Ciechanover, and A. L. Haas. 1982. Immunochemical analysis of the turnover of ubiquitin-protein conjugates in intact cells. J. Biol. Chem. 257:13964.
52. Treier, M., L. M. Staszewski, and D. Bohmann. Ubiquitin-dependent c-Jun degradation in vivo is mediated by the 6 domain. Cell 78:787.
53. Jariel-Encontre, I., M. Pariat, F. Martin, S. Carillo, C. Salvat, and M. Piechaczyk. 1995. Ubiquitinylation is not an absolute requirement for degradation of c-Jun protein by the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 270:11623.
54. Wenzel, T., and W. Baumeister. 1993. Thermoplasma acidophilum proteasomes degrade partially unfolded and ubiquitin-associated proteins. FEBS Lett. 326:215.
55. Löwe, J., D. Stock, B. Jap, P. Zwicki, W. Baumeister, and R. Hubert. 1995. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the Archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 268:533.
56. Seemüller, E., A. Lupas, D. Stock, J. Löwe, R. Huber, and W. Baumeister. 1995. Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophitum: a threonine protease. 1995 Science 268:579.
57. Deveraux, Q., V. Ustrell, C. Pickart, and M. Rechsteiner. 1994. A 26S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 269:7059.